Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Processor N95 vs Intel Processor N50

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3500U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 5 3500C, but the specifications (and performance) are the same.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3500U in our database matches the Intel Core i7-1065G7 in multi-thread performance to be an OK lower mid-range option, as of early 2021.

The Honor MagicBook 14 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3500U that we know of. It can be up to 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to set to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The chip is manufactured on a 12 nm process for subpar, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N50

► remove from comparison Intel N50

The Intel Processor N50 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 2 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Processor N100 (4 cores, 3.4 GHz) due to the reduced core count. The single thread performance however, should be similar. Compared to older processors, the N50 should be comparable to dual core Skylake based CPUs like the Intel Core m3-8100Y (2x 3.4 GHz, 5W).Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only up to 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N50 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Processor N95Intel Processor N50
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Alder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 « 1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz <=3400 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 / 2
2 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP15 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3500U
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
24.8 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
55.5 Points (31%)
108%
1 N95 +
60 Points (34%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
206 Points (4%)
88%
1 N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (38%)     max: 935 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 317     avg: 354.3     median: 364 (40%)     max: 372 Points
96%
1 N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (38%)     max: 357 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1063     avg: 1436     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1540 Points
70%
1 N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 482     avg: 642     median: 650 (4%)     max: 682 Points
68%
1 N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 131     avg: 142.4     median: 143 (40%)     max: 147 Points
106%
1 N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (42%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.6 Points (10%)
73%
1 N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (39%)
111%
1 N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.86 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4542     avg: 4556     median: 4557.5 (28%)     max: 4565 Points
105%
1 N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13249     avg: 16322     median: 17230.5 (12%)     max: 17578 Points
80%
1 N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (14%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
368.2 s (4%)
69%
1 N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
12.9 s (3%)
76%
1 N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2455 Points (4%)
94%
1 N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 15825     avg: 16929     median: 17024.5 (10%)     max: 17508 MIPS
72%
1 N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3502     avg: 3541     median: 3538 (42%)     max: 3580 MIPS
107%
1 N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
39.2 fps (13%)
83%
1 N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (11%)     max: 32.45 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
134.8 fps (31%)
120%
1 N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (37%)     max: 163.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.35     avg: 3.9     median: 4 (7%)     max: 4.15 fps
79%
1 N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (13%)
55%
1 N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
74%
1 N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.4 GB/s (11%)
61%
1 N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 680     avg: 704     median: 694 (5%)     max: 796 Seconds
62%
1 N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.734     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.804 sec
88%
1 N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5044     avg: 5951     median: 5950.5 (13%)     max: 6857 Points
100%
1 N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
62%
1 N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.8 s (1%)
69%
1 N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
697 s (3%)
85%
1 N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
18229 Points (14%)
80%
1 N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (11%)     max: 14929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5213     avg: 6267     median: 6402.5 (16%)     max: 6967 Points
88%
1 N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (14%)     max: 5806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29562     avg: 32942     median: 30254 (25%)     max: 48997 Points
154%
1 N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30656     avg: 34184     median: 31241.5 (25%)     max: 49067 Points
149%
1 N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26201     avg: 36686     median: 32088 (27%)     max: 54995 Points
153%
1 N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (41%)     max: 49955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5217     avg: 6435     median: 6613 (17%)     max: 7132 Points
64%
1 N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7496     avg: 9199     median: 9380 (17%)     max: 10054 Points
63%
1 N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2450     avg: 2660     median: 2696 (11%)     max: 2880 Points
87%
1 N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1101 Points (27%)
111%
N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (31%)     max: 1234 Points
108%
N50 +
1185 Points (30%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
3324 Points (13%)
89%
N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (11%)     max: 3114 Points
61%
N50 +
2024 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 902     avg: 1109     median: 1177 (37%)     max: 1181 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2661     avg: 2835     median: 2850.5 (12%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 777     avg: 886     median: 902 (35%)     max: 909 Points
111%
N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (39%)     max: 1013 Points
99%
N50 +
891 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2543     avg: 3097     median: 3157 (6%)     max: 3269 Points
81%
N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
42%
N50 +
1339 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 772     avg: 880     median: 896 (4%)     max: 913 Points
111%
1 N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2599     avg: 3035     median: 3118.5 (10%)     max: 3244 Points
81%
1 N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3400     avg: 3785     median: 3893 (39%)     max: 3924 Points
114%
1 N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10099     avg: 11388     median: 11783 (12%)     max: 12171 Points
87%
1 N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (10%)     max: 10798 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3669 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10597 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9503     avg: 12182     median: 13040 (23%)     max: 13145 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3258     avg: 3405     median: 3442.5 (67%)     max: 3478 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
13873 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3682 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6193 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6118 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16467 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
12317 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11917 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1101     avg: 1272     median: 1274.5 (1%)     max: 1693 ms
121%
1 N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
128.8 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 19083     avg: 26794     median: 27809 (21%)     max: 32938 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (35%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145     avg: 154     median: 148 (27%)     max: 172 Points
120%
1 N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (32%)     max: 183.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24     avg: 33.7     median: 34.7 (6%)     max: 42.5 Watt
142%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.5     avg: 37     median: 38 (7%)     max: 38.5 Watt
183%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 18.1     median: 18.1 (13%)     max: 18.9 Points per Watt
117%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3500U → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 98% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N50 → 77% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 31. 00:49:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11161 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14971 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753915760s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11161 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 11161 +0.028s ... 0.039s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.004s ... 0.042s

#11 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.01s ... 0.052s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14971 +0s ... 0.052s

#13 got single benchmarks 14971 +0s ... 0.052s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.11s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)