Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs AMD A6-9220

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5000

The Intel Pentium Silver N5000 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max. 2.6 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5000 in our database is in the same league as the AMD 3050e and the Pentium 4415U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really poor result, as of Q3 2023.

The Yoga 330-11IGM is among the fastest laptops featuring the N5000 that we know of. It can be more than 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

AMD A6-9220

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220

The AMD A6-9220 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The 9210 is a mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.5 - 2.9 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9220 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark e.g. it was around 15% slower in our benchmarks (see below). The single core benchmarks were quite similar overall.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N5000AMD A6-9220
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameGemini LakeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 « 1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 « 2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2700 MHz2500 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt10-15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5000
17.7 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1232 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
438 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 167     avg: 170     median: 170 (19%)     max: 173 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 424     avg: 469.3     median: 484 (1%)     max: 500 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 240.2     median: 236.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
min: 109     avg: 111.5     median: 111.5 (1%)     max: 114 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 73     avg: 77.5     median: 78 (23%)     max: 80 Points
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (21%)     max: 69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.8 Points (4%)
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (23%)
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2260     avg: 2292     median: 2295 (14%)     max: 2310 Points
2432 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5730     avg: 6794     median: 6688 (5%)     max: 8195 Points
3941 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
645 s (8%)
915 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.8 s (3%)
27.7 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1245 Points (2%)
770 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
7320 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2431 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
15.4 fps (5%)
8.7 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
46.5 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.3 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2707 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3247     avg: 3320     median: 3320 (7%)     max: 3393 Points
2253 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.2 s (5%)
20.9 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
56.3 s (2%)
46.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1319 s (6%)
1022 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5882 Points (5%)
4236 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2619     median: 2619 (7%)     max: 2969 Points
min: 1467     avg: 1470     median: 1469.5 (4%)     max: 1472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24195     avg: 25128     median: 24695 (20%)     max: 26493 Points
16010 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24199     avg: 24660     median: 24279 (20%)     max: 25501 Points
15125 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26948     avg: 32002     median: 30593 (26%)     max: 38156 Points
15704 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2141     avg: 2355     median: 2307 (6%)     max: 2873 Points
1241 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3193     avg: 3563     median: 3448 (6%)     max: 4263 Points
1721 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A6-9220 +
634 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
421 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1582 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1975     avg: 2027     median: 2027 (20%)     max: 2054 Points
1960 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5467     avg: 5841     median: 5790 (6%)     max: 6202 Points
2857 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2046     median: 2045 (28%)     max: 2084 Points
1885 Points (26%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5460     median: 5488 (13%)     max: 5654 Points
2805 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5045     avg: 5523     median: 5547.5 (10%)     max: 5868 Points
2921 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1707     avg: 1781     median: 1777.5 (35%)     max: 1876 Points
1798 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5789 Points (9%)
3115 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1850 Points (28%)
1909 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3759 Points (30%)
3245 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2847 Points (26%)
2855 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4823 Points (9%)
3510 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6247 Points (13%)
3822 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4819 Points (13%)
3461 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2251     avg: 2714     median: 2797 (3%)     max: 2871 ms
2416 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
194.6 ms (2%)
162.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13075     avg: 13480     median: 13121 (12%)     max: 14601 Points
14724 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 88.2     avg: 89.1     median: 89.1 (19%)     max: 90 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5000 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220 → 75% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 14:37:15

#0 checking url part for id 9420 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9326 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9420 +0.017s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 9420 +0.036s ... 0.091s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9326 +0.003s ... 0.094s

#9 got single benchmarks 9326 +0.01s ... 0.104s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.278s ... 0.382s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.42s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)