Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Gold 5405U vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Pentium Gold 5405U

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 5405U

The Intel Pentium 5405U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core SoC based on the Whiskey-Lake architecture and has been launched in 2019. The CPU can be found in ultrabooks as well as normal notebooks. In addition to two CPU cores with Hyper-Threading clocked at 2.3 GHz (no Turbo Boost), the chip also integrates an HD Graphics 610 GPU and a dual-channel DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory controller. The SoC is manufactured using a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++).

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before. Compared to Kaby-Lake Refresh, Whiskey Lake only features a slightly improved process from 14nm+ to 14nm++.

Performance

The average 5405U in our database is in the same league as the Pentium N5000, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Performance of this kind is only sufficient for basic day-to-day tasks such as checking one's inbox, as of early 2023.

Graphics

The integrated graphics unit called UHD Graphics 610 (similar to the HD Graphics 510) represents the "GT1" version of the Whiskey Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9). Its 12 Execution Units, also called EUs, run at 300 - 950 MHz and offer a performance somewhat below the older HD Graphics 4400. Only a few games of 2018 can be played smoothly in lowest settings.

Power consumption

This Pentium has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit) which is a little too high to be appropriate for a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC. OEMs are free to reduce that value somewhat, 12.5 W being the lower limit, with clock speeds and performance taking a hit as a result.

Intel Pentium 5405U is built with a fairly old, as of early 2023, 14 nm process making for subpar energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Gold 5405UIntel Celeron N4100
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UGemini Lake
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Gemini Lake
Clock2300 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB
L3 Cache2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1090
FeaturesLPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2133 RAM, PCIe 2, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, ABM, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (300 - 950 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium 5405U
18.4 pt (31%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
15.7 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1390 Points (1%)
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
539 Points (23%)
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 204     avg: 206     median: 206 (22%)     max: 208 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 513     avg: 524     median: 524 (1%)     max: 535 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 227     avg: 233     median: 233 (1%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 91.1     avg: 92.6     median: 92.6 (26%)     max: 94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.53     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.02     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (25%)     max: 1.09 Points
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (20%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3490     avg: 3561     median: 3560.5 (22%)     max: 3631 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 7847     avg: 7886     median: 7885.5 (6%)     max: 7924 Points
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10418 Points (7%)
10929 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4704 Points (6%)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 708     avg: 711     median: 711 (8%)     max: 714.014 s
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 22.26     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (5%)     max: 22.797 s
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1760     avg: 1904     median: 1904 (3%)     max: 2048 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 6446     avg: 6502     median: 6501.5 (4%)     max: 6557 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2493     avg: 2528     median: 2528 (30%)     max: 2563 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15.5     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (5%)     max: 15.7 fps
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (4%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 80.9     avg: 82.2     median: 82.2 (19%)     max: 83.4 fps
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (13%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.24     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.138     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.145 GB/s
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.229     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.246 GB/s
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (4%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2168     avg: 2180     median: 2179.5 (15%)     max: 2191 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.183     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.254 sec
min: 1.75     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (38%)     max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3193     avg: 3224     median: 3224 (7%)     max: 3255 Points
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16.652     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.26 s
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 37.337     avg: 39.6     median: 39.6 (2%)     max: 41.8 s
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 863.506     avg: 879     median: 878.8 (4%)     max: 894 s
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
8919 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3018     avg: 3149     median: 3148.5 (8%)     max: 3279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30794     avg: 31261     median: 31260.5 (25%)     max: 31727 Points
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31675 Points (26%)
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 32375     avg: 33204     median: 33204 (27%)     max: 34033 Points
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (19%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2638     avg: 2667     median: 2667 (7%)     max: 2696 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3733     avg: 3785     median: 3784.5 (7%)     max: 3836 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1439 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
328 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
833 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 570     avg: 585     median: 585 (23%)     max: 600 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1255     avg: 1324     median: 1324 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
min: 1082     avg: 1267     median: 1271 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 573     avg: 588     median: 588 (3%)     max: 603 Points
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1266     avg: 1324     median: 1323.5 (4%)     max: 1381 Points
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2650     avg: 2810     median: 2810 (28%)     max: 2970 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5031     avg: 5419     median: 5418.5 (5%)     max: 5806 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (20%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (7%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14452 Points (23%)
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3898 Points (58%)
1762 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (21%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
5857 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5156 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4845 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5050 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5080 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1856     avg: 1914     median: 1913.5 (2%)     max: 1971 ms
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
175 ms (2%)
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
16762 Points (12%)
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (8%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 101     avg: 102.6     median: 102.6 (18%)     max: 104.2 Points
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (14%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
481 Points (18%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.8     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 23.6 Watt
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.7     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (3%)     max: 21 Watt
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.7 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 11.4     avg: 14     median: 14 (10%)     max: 16.6 Points per Watt
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 5405U → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 76% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 23:30:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11256 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755466231s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11256 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 11256 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.012s ... 0.032s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.087s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)