Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs AMD A9-9425

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5000

The Intel Pentium Silver N5000 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max. 2.6 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5000 in our database is in the same league as the AMD 3050e and the Pentium 4415U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really poor result, as of Q3 2023.

The Yoga 330-11IGM is among the fastest laptops featuring the N5000 that we know of. It can be more than 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

AMD A9-9425

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9425

The AMD A9-9425 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2018. Compared to the one year older A9-9420, the 9425 has a 100 MHz higher CPU clock speed (base and boost) as well as a marginally faster iGPU. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked at 3.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at up to 900 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video decoder and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average 9425 in our database proves to be a rather slow CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Intel Core i3-4012Y. Much like it is with N-class Intel chips, expect a system built around an A9-9425 to perform poorly in all but the most basic tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above.

Power consumption

This A9 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that somewhat with 10 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value; clock speeds and performance will be reduced as a result. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the APU.

Last but not the least, the AMD A9-9425 is manufactured on a 28 nm process for very, very low energy efficiency, as of 2022.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N5000AMD A9-9425
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameGemini LakeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 « 1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9425 « 3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2700 MHz3100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5000
17.7 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1232 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
438 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 167     avg: 170     median: 170 (19%)     max: 173 Points
195 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 424     avg: 469.3     median: 484 (1%)     max: 500 Points
284 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 240.2     median: 236.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
125 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 73     avg: 77.5     median: 78 (23%)     max: 80 Points
76 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.8 Points (4%)
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (23%)
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2260     avg: 2292     median: 2295 (14%)     max: 2310 Points
2686 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5730     avg: 6794     median: 6688 (5%)     max: 8195 Points
4338 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
645 s (8%)
802 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.8 s (3%)
25.8 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1245 Points (2%)
891 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
7320 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2431 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
15.4 fps (5%)
9.7 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
50.5 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.3 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
1 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2707 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3247     avg: 3320     median: 3320 (7%)     max: 3393 Points
2314 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.2 s (5%)
17 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
56.3 s (2%)
38.2 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1319 s (6%)
853 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5882 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2619     median: 2619 (7%)     max: 2969 Points
1527 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24195     avg: 25128     median: 24695 (20%)     max: 26493 Points
16539 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24199     avg: 24660     median: 24279 (20%)     max: 25501 Points
15856 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26948     avg: 32002     median: 30593 (26%)     max: 38156 Points
19290 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2141     avg: 2355     median: 2307 (6%)     max: 2873 Points
1269 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3193     avg: 3563     median: 3448 (6%)     max: 4263 Points
1823 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A9-9425 +
705 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
421 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1582 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1975     avg: 2027     median: 2027 (20%)     max: 2054 Points
2244 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5467     avg: 5841     median: 5790 (6%)     max: 6202 Points
3636 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2046     median: 2045 (28%)     max: 2084 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5460     median: 5488 (13%)     max: 5654 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5045     avg: 5523     median: 5547.5 (10%)     max: 5868 Points
3323 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1707     avg: 1781     median: 1777.5 (35%)     max: 1876 Points
2039 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5789 Points (9%)
3605 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1850 Points (28%)
2228 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3759 Points (30%)
4145 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2847 Points (26%)
3069 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4823 Points (9%)
5175 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6247 Points (13%)
4798 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4819 Points (13%)
4518 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2251     avg: 2714     median: 2797 (3%)     max: 2871 ms
2466 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
194.6 ms (2%)
176.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13075     avg: 13480     median: 13121 (12%)     max: 14601 Points
13562 Points (12%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 88.2     avg: 89.1     median: 89.1 (19%)     max: 90 Points
76 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5000 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9425 → 83% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 22:47:42

#0 checking url part for id 9420 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11291 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9420 +0.021s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 9420 +0.044s ... 0.111s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11291 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#9 got single benchmarks 11291 +0.014s ... 0.128s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.128s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.319s ... 0.447s

#12 return log +0.035s ... 0.482s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)