Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i3-N305

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N200Intel Celeron N4500Intel Core i3-N305
CodenameAlder Lake-NJasper LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 / 28 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP6 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
SocketBGA1338BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
L1 Cache768 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
65 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
356%
1 i3-N305 +
324 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
709 Points (1%)
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N200 +
690 Points (29%)
452 Points (19%)
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
188 Points (20%)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (41%)     max: 380 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
332 Points (1%)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
171 Points (1%)
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
82 Points (23%)
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
1 Points (25%)
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
347%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
6954 Points (4%)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
5266 Points (6%)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
1270 s (15%)
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
50.2 s (10%)
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
1076 Points (2%)
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
12 fps (4%)
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (19%)     max: 56.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
345%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
2053 Points (4%)
9081 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
22.8 s (5%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
51.4 s (2%)
36.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
1132 s (5%)
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
305%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
1507 Points (4%)
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (22%)     max: 9111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
201%
1 i3-N305 +
55544 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
197%
1 i3-N305 +
56367 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
178%
1 i3-N305 +
61854 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
1521 Points (4%)
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
2017 Points (4%)
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
504 Points (2%)
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
N200 +
956 Points (24%)
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (33%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
148%
1 i3-N305 +
1261 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
333%
1 i3-N305 +
4584 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (36%)
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (41%)     max: 1083 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
118%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
296%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
102%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
171%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (27%)     max: 108 Points
168%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (46%)     max: 194 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (33%)     max: 190.4 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (2%)
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
227%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
43 MB/s (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (61%)
374.6 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (28%)     max: 7878 Points
152%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N200 +
614 Points (23%)
381 Points (14%)
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (34%)     max: 1027 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
9.1 Watt (2%)
36.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
161%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 5.49 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
139%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 62% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 220% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 00:27:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753828036s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.007s ... 0.04s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.076s ... 0.116s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.116s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)