Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 506 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP2

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP4

The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.

The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.

Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8.

Qualcomm Adreno 506

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 506 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

ARM Mali-T880 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP2

The ARM Mali-T880 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P20 SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.

show full text
ARM Mali-T880 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 506ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)Midgard (4th Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (4rd-gen)Adreno 500Midgard (4rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz650 MHz900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1
technology16 nm14 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
Date of Announcement26.11.2015 15.12.2015 26.11.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T880 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9558 x 2500 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9508 x 2300 MHz? MHz900 MHz
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X10 x 2600 MHz? MHz875 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz780 - 900 MHz
CPU in Adreno 506GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6328 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6268 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6258 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4508 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 900 MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P258 x 2600 MHz1000 MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67578 x 2300 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.900 - ? MHz? - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 12649     avg: 18258     median: 17736.5 (2%)     max: 22157 Points
min: 7668     avg: 13091     median: 13240 (2%)     max: 14741 Points
min: 10023     avg: 13267     median: 13844 (2%)     max: 14288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
98665 Points (13%)
min: 7040     avg: 7261     median: 7309 (1%)     max: 7435 Points
min: 6839     avg: 8665     median: 9269 (1%)     max: 9283 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10624 Points (1%)
12169 Points (1%)
min: 10498     avg: 11431     median: 11898 (1%)     max: 11898 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 636     avg: 1092     median: 1151.5 (5%)     max: 1242 Points
min: 533     avg: 847     median: 851 (4%)     max: 951 Points
min: 826     avg: 976     median: 991.5 (4%)     max: 1069 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 575     avg: 1002     median: 1068.5 (2%)     max: 1133 Points
min: 440     avg: 732     median: 734 (2%)     max: 814 Points
min: 767     avg: 882     median: 893.5 (2%)     max: 978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 410     avg: 915     median: 950 (5%)     max: 1157 Points
min: 488     avg: 524     median: 510.5 (3%)     max: 882 Points
min: 626     avg: 720     median: 717 (4%)     max: 795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 360     avg: 816     median: 833 (2%)     max: 1108 Points
min: 403     avg: 433.9     median: 421.5 (1%)     max: 761 Points
min: 556     avg: 620     median: 633 (2%)     max: 647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (0%)     max: 2.5 fps
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
1.5 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.2 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (0%)     max: 3.9 fps
4.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.8     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (1%)     max: 7.3 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.5 (0%)     max: 3.9 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 4     median: 4.1 (0%)     max: 4.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.1     avg: 10.3     median: 10 (0%)     max: 13 fps
min: 3.5     avg: 6.5     median: 6.4 (0%)     max: 14 fps
min: 3.4     avg: 6     median: 6.8 (0%)     max: 6.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 16.3     median: 18 (1%)     max: 19 fps
min: 3.1     avg: 9.6     median: 9.8 (1%)     max: 11 fps
min: 9.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 34.3     median: 39 (0%)     max: 41 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 506
min: 21     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (0%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
min: 21     avg: 23.1     median: 24 (0%)     max: 24 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44 fps (73%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 16610     avg: 16649     median: 16649 (38%)     max: 16688 Points
10438 Points (24%)
min: 9655     avg: 9936     median: 9935.5 (23%)     max: 10216 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 29659     avg: 29661     median: 29660.5 (66%)     max: 29662 Points
21210 Points (47%)
min: 18345     avg: 19359     median: 19359 (43%)     max: 20373 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6747     avg: 6960     median: 6988 (7%)     max: 7145 Points
min: 2337     avg: 3197     median: 3197 (3%)     max: 4057 Points
min: 3868     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (4%)     max: 4072 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1344     avg: 1469     median: 1516 (3%)     max: 1548 Points
min: 1371     avg: 1472     median: 1472 (3%)     max: 1573 Points
min: 1046     avg: 1086     median: 1085.5 (2%)     max: 1125 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4599 Points (100%)
3466 Points (75%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 506 → 62% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 67% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 506:
53.5  fps
high
Adreno 506:
48  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 25 ~ 25 fps
112%
Adreno 506:
25 26 26 29 30 30 ~ 28 fps
med.
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24  fps
108%
Adreno 506:
23 25 26 26 30 ~ 26 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 506:
30 31 31 31 31 32 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Adreno 506:
30 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 ~ 31 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42  fps
136%
Adreno 506:
54 57 60 ~ 57 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42  fps
131%
Adreno 506:
50 53 54 60 60 ~ 55 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 34 44 56 60 ~ 45 fps
91%
Adreno 506:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 53 55 56 56 57 58 ~ 41 fps
102%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 57 ~ 46 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 506:
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 30 30 30 ~ 27 fps
107%
Adreno 506:
24 28 28 28 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
111%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29  fps
100%
Adreno 506:
26 27 28 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29  fps
79%
Adreno 506:
15 21 24 28 28.5 ~ 23 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 506:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-T880 MP2:
52  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 506 → 107%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 119%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Qualcomm Adreno 506lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift53.548
PUBG Mobile2826
Arena of Valor3131
Shadow Fight 35755
Dead Trigger 241
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
Asphalt 9: Legends2923
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		2
4

1


2
3
1

1







ARM Mali-T880 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile2524
Shadow Fight 34242
Dead Trigger 245
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
Asphalt 9: Legends2929
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		2
2

1


2
2










ARM Mali-T880 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 246
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





3










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 23:37:38

#0 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7443 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:41:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.116s ... 0.117s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.117s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.117s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7170 +0.037s ... 0.155s

#9 got single benchmarks 7170 +0.033s ... 0.188s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7443 +0.002s ... 0.19s

#11 got single benchmarks 7443 +0.103s ... 0.293s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0.002s ... 0.294s

#13 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.034s ... 0.328s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.328s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.111s ... 0.439s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.494s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.494s

#18 Got 117 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.526s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.526s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.53s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.548s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.548s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.55s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)