Notebookcheck Logo

AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Core i5-7600K vs AMD PRO A12-9800B

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

Intel Core i5-7600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7600K

The Intel Core i5-7600K is a fast quad-core processor for desktops based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer Kaby-Lake-H Core i5 series at the time of the announcement. The i5 does not support HyperThreading (4 threads only) and runs from 3.8 (base speed) up to 4.2 GHz. As a K-model, the i5-7600K offers an open multiplicator for overclocking.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i5-7600K is about 10 percent above the predecessor Core i5-6600K, thanks to clock speed increases and long hold Turbo Boost clocks. Matching clock speed, there is no speed improvement from Skylake. The old top model Core i7-4790K however is still slightly faster.

More information with gaming benchmarks and power measurements can be found in our AMD Ryzen 7 versus Intel CPUs review (upcoming).

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1150 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency slightly. Intel still specifies the TDP with 91 Watts, which is a lot more than the 45 Watts of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H CPUs.

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD FX-9830PIntel Core i5-7600KAMD PRO A12-9800B
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby LakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K « 3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock3000 - 3700 MHz3800 - 4200 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP25-45 Watt91 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB
SocketFCLGA1151FP4
$242 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
301 Points (2%)
min: 660     avg: 674     median: 674 (4%)     max: 688 Points
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
93 Points (28%)
min: 168     avg: 179.5     median: 179.5 (54%)     max: 191 Points
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (23%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.6 Points (5%)
min: 7.67     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (10%)     max: 8.07 Points
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (27%)
min: 1.98     avg: 2     median: 2 (50%)     max: 2.05 Points
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3033 Points (18%)
min: 6730     avg: 6814     median: 6814 (41%)     max: 6898 Points
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (16%)     max: 2621 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9822 Points (7%)
min: 23585     avg: 24179     median: 24179 (18%)     max: 24773 Points
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (5%)     max: 7257 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10237 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3499 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
315.9 s (4%)
min: 253.6     avg: 256.6     median: 256.6 (3%)     max: 259.5 s
475.7 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.3 s (2%)
min: 8.3     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 8.672 s
13.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3570 Points (6%)
1383 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.2 fps (16%)
16.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (51%)
77 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.303     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.367 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
min: 0.534     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (10%)     max: 0.611 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
min: 2.9     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (9%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8532 Points (18%)
3249 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
min: 8.74     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 8.891 s
18.6 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.7 s (2%)
min: 19.9     avg: 20.1     median: 20.1 (1%)     max: 20.22 s
41.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
870 s (4%)
min: 465     avg: 466.3     median: 466.3 (2%)     max: 467.5 s
908 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
8381 Points (23%)
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (6%)     max: 2448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
34521 Points (28%)
65821 Points (53%)
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (21%)     max: 26961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31580 Points (26%)
66315 Points (54%)
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
34398 Points (29%)
69090 Points (58%)
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2945 Points (7%)
5972 Points (15%)
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
min: 8839     avg: 9066     median: 9065.5 (16%)     max: 9292 Points
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (5%)     max: 3251 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4152 Points (18%)
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5225 Points (71%)
2073 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15030 Points (37%)
4453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14426 Points (23%)
5575 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4455 Points (67%)
2109 Points (32%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5326 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2031 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
818 ms (1%)
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
123.5 ms (1%)
56.9 ms (1%)
170.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (16%)     max: 18435 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
124 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7600K → 172% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → 84% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 04. 16:35:23

#0 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8528 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.061s ... 0.062s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.003s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.01s ... 0.075s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8528 +0.003s ... 0.078s

#10 got single benchmarks 8528 +0.009s ... 0.087s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0.003s ... 0.09s

#12 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.011s ... 0.1s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.442s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.442s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)