Notebookcheck Logo

AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4415Y

The Intel Pentium 4415Y is a low power entry level processor for small laptops or tablets and based on the Kaby Lake architecture. It was announced in Q2 2017 and offers two processor cores clocked at 1.6 GHz (no Turbo Boost). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. Compared to the much faster Core m3-7Y30, the Pentium 4415 offers no Turbo Boost, different CPU and GPU clock speeds, a smaller L3 cache and a higher TDP of 6 Watt.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost, the Pentium 4415Y offers a significantly worse single thread performance than the more expensive Core m3-7Y30. This should be noticeable in daily tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 850 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The TDP is rated at 6 Watt and can be reduced to 4,5 Watt (cTDP down).

ModelAMD FX-9830PIntel Pentium Gold 4415Y
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
» AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
» Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock3000 - 3700 MHz1600 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP25-45 Watt6 Watt
Transistors3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge FX-9830PIntel Kaby Lake Pentium 4415Y
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache2 MB
SocketFCBGA1515
$161 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
301 Points (3%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
164 Points (2%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
93 Points (32%)
65 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.6 Points (7%)
1.8 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (3%)
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3033 Points (27%)
2521 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9822 Points (13%)
5586 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7213 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3264 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
315.9 s (4%)
982 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.3 s (2%)
31.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1455 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.3 fps (16%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.1 fps (2%)
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.911.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (10%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.7 s (2%)
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
870 s (4%)
1240 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (11%)     max: 3110 Points
2319 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
34521 Points (22%)
20028 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31580 Points (26%)
19576 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
34398 Points (29%)
20366 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2945 Points (7%)
1836 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (9%)     max: 4340 Points
2541 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3077 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
123.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11875 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y → 63% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 03:12:22

#0 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9580 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.012s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.018s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0s ... 0.019s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9580 +0s ... 0.028s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got single benchmarks 9580 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.05s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s ... 0.068s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.079s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#67 return log +0.004s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)