Notebookcheck Logo

AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y vs AMD A10-9600P

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4415Y

The Intel Pentium 4415Y is a low power entry level processor for small laptops or tablets and based on the Kaby Lake architecture. It was announced in Q2 2017 and offers two processor cores clocked at 1.6 GHz (no Turbo Boost). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. Compared to the much faster Core m3-7Y30, the Pentium 4415 offers no Turbo Boost, different CPU and GPU clock speeds, a smaller L3 cache and a higher TDP of 6 Watt.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost, the Pentium 4415Y offers a significantly worse single thread performance than the more expensive Core m3-7Y30. This should be noticeable in daily tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 850 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The TDP is rated at 6 Watt and can be reduced to 4,5 Watt (cTDP down).

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

ModelAMD FX-9830PIntel Pentium Gold 4415YAMD A10-9600P
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby LakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock3000 - 3700 MHz1600 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 44 / 4
TDP25-45 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C90 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXTDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 850 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache2 MB
SocketFCBGA1515
$161 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
301 Points (2%)
164 Points (1%)
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (1%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
93 Points (28%)
65 Points (20%)
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (23%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.6 Points (5%)
1.8 Points (2%)
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (27%)
0.8 Points (19%)
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3033 Points (18%)
2521 Points (15%)
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (15%)     max: 2520 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9822 Points (7%)
5586 Points (4%)
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (5%)     max: 6939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7213 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3264 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
315.9 s (4%)
982 s (12%)
534 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.3 s (2%)
31.1 s (6%)
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1455 Points (2%)
1526 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11 fps (4%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.3 fps (13%)
85.4 fps (20%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.1 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
0 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
16.3 s (4%)
18.7 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.7 s (2%)
35.9 s (2%)
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
870 s (4%)
1240 s (6%)
942 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (7%)     max: 7916 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
2319 Points (6%)
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
34521 Points (28%)
20028 Points (16%)
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (19%)     max: 24803 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31580 Points (26%)
19576 Points (16%)
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
34398 Points (29%)
20366 Points (17%)
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2945 Points (7%)
1836 Points (5%)
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
2541 Points (5%)
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (5%)     max: 3229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1045 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2047 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4711 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2237 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3077 ms (4%)
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
123.5 ms (1%)
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11875 Points (11%)
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (18%)     max: 19791 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y → 63% n=20

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → 81% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 18:51:54

#0 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.011s ... 0.063s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9580 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 9580 +0.01s ... 0.077s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.003s ... 0.079s

#12 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.023s ... 0.103s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.304s ... 0.407s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.407s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)