Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5100 vs Intel Core i5-8365U vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-8365U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8365U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro capable CPUs of the WHL-U series. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i5-8250U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i5-8365U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4.1 GHz (versus 3.4 GHz of the i5-8250U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8265U, the i5-8365U offers a 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost. As the i5-8365U first appeared in a Thinkpad, the CPU most likely supports vPRO for additional hardware management features.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i5-8365U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Compared to the Core i5-8265U (see for benchmarks), the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost should result in some gains in single core benchmarks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N5100Intel Core i5-8365UIntel Pentium Silver N6000
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core i5Intel Jasper Lake
CodenameJasper LakeWhiskey Lake-UJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8365U « 1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz1600 - 4100 MHz1100 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 84 / 4
TDP6 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1528BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8365U
28.9 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 419     avg: 421.3     median: 421 (47%)     max: 424 Points
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1373     avg: 1404     median: 1408 (3%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 558     avg: 584     median: 579 (4%)     max: 620 Points
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 166.5     median: 166 (50%)     max: 171 Points
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.7 Points (7%)
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (48%)
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6557 Points (40%)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16518 Points (12%)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.7 s (4%)
727 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
16.9 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3173 Points (5%)
1330 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 16711     avg: 17312     median: 17293 (10%)     max: 17932 MIPS
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3958     avg: 4261     median: 4346 (52%)     max: 4478 MIPS
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
35.9 fps (13%)
18.4 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
153 fps (35%)
93.4 fps (22%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 4.7 fps
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
2.8 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 791     avg: 824     median: 825 (6%)     max: 855 Seconds
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6330 Points (13%)
3985 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
546 s (2%)
895 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6016     avg: 6522     median: 6395 (17%)     max: 7280 Points
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 48328     avg: 49088     median: 49088 (40%)     max: 49848 Points
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49912     avg: 50182     median: 50182 (41%)     max: 50452 Points
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 56207     median: 56206.5 (47%)     max: 57042 Points
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5405     avg: 5910     median: 6159 (16%)     max: 6166 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7744     avg: 8377     median: 8376.5 (15%)     max: 9009 Points
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2464 Points (10%)
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
631 Points (27%)
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1788 Points (3%)
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4647     avg: 4823     median: 4822.5 (48%)     max: 4998 Points
3188 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14833     avg: 15472     median: 15472 (17%)     max: 16111 Points
8341 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4558 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13444 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1142     median: 1161 (1%)     max: 1165 ms
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31051     avg: 32738     median: 32878 (30%)     max: 34285 Points
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (31%)     max: 34874 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.9 Watt (7%)
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.5 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8365U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 11:35:56

#0 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11330 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.013s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11330 +0.021s ... 0.073s

#10 got single benchmarks 11330 +0.02s ... 0.093s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.018s ... 0.111s

#12 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.024s ... 0.135s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.366s ... 0.501s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.501s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)