Notebookcheck

Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 Laptop Review: The hybrid device leaves a good impression despite its yielding keyboard

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Todor Gerganov), 09/30/2019

The changing business display. With the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1, the Texan manufacturer has a competitor for Microsoft's Surface Pro 6 on the market. Especially corporate customers should be impressed with features such as built-in LTE. The design-related instability of the keyboard represents the biggest disadvantage of this Dell laptop.

To establish a completely new category is an endeavor that does not succeed very often in the laptop market. An example of a successful one would be the Microsoft Surface 2-in-1. Meanwhile, almost every PC manufacturer offers 2-in-1 tablets with removable keyboard, even in different segments. The Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is such a device and represents mainly the high-priced business segment.

As a result, Dell is in direct competition with Lenovo and HP, as is often the case in this area. As far as Lenovo is concerned, one has to consider the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet as a competitor. In the case of HP, this is the Elite X2 1013 G3. In addition, the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is a serious competitor too.

Our test model is almost a high-end configuration, with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. Only with the processor (Intel Core i5-8365U) there would still be room for improvement. A similarly equipped model costs German customers about 1750 Euros (~$1914).

Dell Latitude 7200 (Latitude 7200 Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR3-2133, soldered
Display
12.3 inch 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 188 PPI, 10 point multi-touch, native pen support, SHP14A3 LQ123N1, IPS LED, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB 
, 412 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Noble Lock
Networking
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, DW5821e Snapdragon X20 LTE modem, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.35 x 292 x 208.8 ( = 0.37 x 11.5 x 8.22 in)
Battery
38 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: 6 rows, chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Folio keyboard, Dell Command, Dell Power Manager, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.18 kg ( = 41.62 oz / 2.6 pounds), Power Supply: 265 g ( = 9.35 oz / 0.58 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Case of the Dell Latitude 12 Made of Magnesium and Aluminum

Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1
Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1

Take a Dell Latitude 7300 and turn it into a tablet - the result is the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. The Dell PC actually looks very similar in design to its subnotebook counterpart. This is especially valid for the aluminum version of the Dell Latitude 7300, which we did not test. As with this model, Dell relies mainly on silver metal, which is in optical contrast to the black display frame and the keyboard.

In terms of quality, the whole construction is at a very high level. The combination of magnesium, aluminum and glass provides the tablet with a very good stability. The attachable keyboard is comparatively stable too. It is partly made of brushed aluminum and its bottom side has a velvety-soft rubber coating. Due to its design, the keyboard is of course much more flexible than the tablet. The craftsmanship of the entire laptop is perfect.

The wide base keeps the Dell Latitude 12 7200 2-in-1 stable in the desired position thanks to some rubber stoppers. The hinges of the base allow an opening angle of about 160 degrees.

With a 12.3-inch LCD diagonal, the Dell Latitude 12 7200 2-in-1 is about the size of the Microsoft Surface Pro 6. The latter, however, is still a bit more compact, lighter, and slimmer. Both the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet and the HP Elite x2 1013 G3 are much larger and the ThinkPad X1 Tablet is also a bit heavier. These two tablets have 13-inch displays though.

Size Comparison

304 mm / 12 inch 225.6 mm / 8.88 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 1.3 kg2.82 lbs300 mm / 11.8 inch 231.5 mm / 9.11 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 1.2 kg2.58 lbs292 mm / 11.5 inch 208.8 mm / 8.22 inch 9.35 mm / 0.3681 inch 1.2 kg2.6 lbs292 mm / 11.5 inch 201 mm / 7.91 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 1.1 kg2.4 lbs

Dell PC with Better Port Equipment Than Competitors

Spartan for a laptop, bulky for a tablet - that's how the Dell 7200 2-in-1's interface equipment can be summarized. The laptop is clearly superior to its competitors in this regard. It has both a USB A port (which the HP Elite x2 1013 G3 and the ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 3 lack) and two Thunderbolt 3 ports. The Microsoft Surface Pro 6 does not have a single one of the latter. Since there are two Thunderbolt 3 ports, they are also automatically connected to four PCIe lanes.

Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type A, cable lock slot
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type A, cable lock slot
Left-hand side: 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports, memory card reader (microSD), SIM card slot, combo headphone/microphone jack
Left-hand side: 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports, memory card reader (microSD), SIM card slot, combo headphone/microphone jack

SD Card Reader

A microSD card reader is also included with the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. It is situated on the left side of the case and is easily accessible. The Dell Latitude 12 scored the best in our benchmarks with the Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card. The microSD card reader of the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is less than half as fast, as is the card reader of the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 3.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7200
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
177 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=132)
62 MB/s ∼35% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7200
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
193.4 MB/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Convertible
  (19.2 - 246, n=129)
77.1 MB/s ∼40% -60%

Communication

The primary communication module is the Intel Wireless AC 9560, a 2x2 Wi-Fi module. It functions perfectly and achieved very good download and upload speeds in the benchmarks. There is no Wi-Fi 6 option (AX) according to the data sheet. Nonetheless, a WWAN module is installed ex-factory: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem enables flexible, fast Internet access when you are on the move. However, a separate SIM card should be used.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
605 MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼94% -2%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 688, n=147)
490 MBit/s ∼77% -19%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼93% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 743, n=147)
495 MBit/s ∼83% -15%

Security

As a business device, the Dell Latitude 12 7200 2-in-1 has some security features. These include the fingerprint reader on the back of the case and the Noble Lock on the right. In addition, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 supports facial recognition via Windows Hello and the necessary infrared camera is available. There is an optional smart card reader which is not included with our test device.

Accessories

Apart from the 65-watt power supply, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 does not come with any accessories. There is an optional digitizer pen, based on N-Trig technology.

Maintenance

Unlike the Microsoft Surface Pro 6, for example, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 can be opened and repaired. However, this is a bit more difficult than with regular laptops. To get inside, you have to remove the display, which requires you to loosen six screws and numerous clips. Since the display is wired to the mainboard, the respective cable has to be removed as well. Due to the level of difficulty, we refrained from opening the Dell laptop. If you are not deterred by that, you can, for example, upgrade the M.2 2242 SSD and exchange components such as the WWAN card and the battery. In addition, you can also clean the fan if necessary.

Dell provides an extensive service manual for the Latitude 7200.

Warranty

Ex-factory, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 has a three-year limited warranty with on-site service. For an extra charge, you can extend the warranty or equip the machine with Dell's ProSupport.

Input Devices - the Touchpad of the Dell Laptop Is Better Than Its Keyboard

Keyboard

Unlike a subnotebook like the Dell Latitude 7300, the keyboard is not an integral part of the system, but rather a kind of add-on. After all, it is not firmly integrated, but is in an add-on module that is connected to the screen with magnets and some pogo pins. Eventually, the typing experience suffers. By itself, the keys have a short stroke and a pleasant pressure point, but the thin keyboard cover is not stable enough. As one types, the keyboard noticeably yields. This problem is common to all convertibles of this type. Overall, the keyboard is fine, even if it is not quite comparable to a "real" laptop one.

It should be noted that it is a backlit keyboard with two different levels - the backlight is automatically disabled after a few seconds, but this can be changed in the BIOS. Also note that the keyboard does not have the full width of a desktop one due to the overall width of the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. That may make it necessary to get used to.

Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 keyboard area
Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 keyboard area

Touchpad

The touchpad in the keyboard cover has a glass surface with a touch-capable area of 10 x 5.5 cm (~3.94 x 2.17 in). This makes the touchpad significantly different from the one we found in the Dell Latitude 7300. The glass surface is of much higher quality and more comfortable to use than the rough plastic surface of the Dell Latitude 7300. Furthermore, dispensing with dedicated buttons allows a larger surface area. Overall, we are very pleased with the touchpad and its driver implementation.

Of course, you can also use the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 with the perfectly functioning 10-point touchscreen. A digitizer pen is another option, but it was not included with our review unit.

Dell Latitude with Glossy 3:2 Display

Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 pixel grid
Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 pixel grid
Barely any backlight bleeding (exaggerated)
Barely any backlight bleeding (exaggerated)

Dell only offers a single display option for the Latitude 7200 2-in-1: A 12.3-inch IPS LCD with a resolution of 1920x1280 (Full HD/WUXGA) in 3:2 format, whose surface is glossy. Dell is thus lagging behind the competition in both the resolution and the size of the LCD: The HP Elite x2 1013 G3 and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tabet Gen 3 each have 13-inch displays with a resolution of 3000x2000 (3K). Microsoft Surface Pro 6 has the same display size as the Latitude, but a resolution of 2736x1824 pixels (2K).

Not only in terms of pixel density and size is the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 worse than its direct competitors, the brightness levels are also lower. We measured an average brightness of 385 cd/m2 - the ThinkPad and the HP Elite Tablet each achieve values of about 415 cd/m2. The display of the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is even 473 cd/m2 bright on average.

The built-in panel barely showed any backlight bleeding and the illumination was also good at 88%. On the other hand, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is the only business tablet in the test with significant PWM. However, the measured PWM frequency of 1,645 Hz is still high enough, so that even the most sensitive users should not have any problems.

402
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SHP14A3 LQ123N1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 402 cd/m² Average: 384.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 394 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Dell Latitude 7200
SHP14A3 LQ123N1, , 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Response Times
-7%
18%
427%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 (26, 26)
47.2 (21.2, 26)
9%
47 (23, 24)
10%
43 (21, 22)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
34.8 (18.4, 16.4)
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
-22%
26 (14, 12)
25%
25 (13, 12)
28%
PWM Frequency
1645 (25)
22000 (50)
1237%
Screen
-30%
-51%
-36%
Brightness middle
401
474
18%
452
13%
484
21%
Brightness
385
418
9%
412
7%
473
23%
Brightness Distribution
88
76
-14%
85
-3%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.33
-18%
0.48
-71%
0.33
-18%
Contrast
1432
1436
0%
942
-34%
1467
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.2
-78%
4.05
-125%
4.29
-138%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.4
6.1
-79%
6.64
-95%
6.46
-90%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
0.9
18%
1.56
-42%
1.34
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
4.5
-181%
4.87
-204%
4.3
-169%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.51 88%
CCT
6702 97%
5881 111%
7160 91%
7315 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.6
64
-4%
62
-7%
62
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
99.4
0%
97
-2%
95
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -26%
-17% / -41%
196% / 63%

* ... smaller is better

Color values
Color values
Saturation
Saturation
Grayscale
Grayscale
Color values (calibrated)
Color values (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Grayscale (calibrated)
Grayscale (calibrated)

The contrast is 1432:1 - a good value, which confirms our subjectively positive image impression. This is matched by the very good color space coverage - 99.4% of the sRGB color space. Thus, the display can also be used for semi-professional image editing.

sRGB: 99,4 %
sRGB: 99,4 %
AdobeRGB: 66,6 %
AdobeRGB: 66,6 %
Outdoors (in the shade)
Outdoors (in the shade)

The Latitude 7200 2-in-1 can be used outdoors thanks to the sufficiently high LCD brightness. Reflections, however, are annoying. An even higher LCD brightness would not have hurt.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1645 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1645 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1645 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The viewing angle stability of the screen is very good thanks to the use of IPS technology. Except for possible reflections, there is nothing to complain about.

Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 viewing angles
Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 viewing angles

Disappointing CPU Performance by the Dell Laptop

The configuration options for the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 are not many. As a buyer, you have the choice between two Intel CPUs (Core i5-8365U and i7-8665U), two RAM sizes (8 or 16 GB soldered LPDDR3-2133 memory) and two SSD sizes (256 or 512 GB).

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon

Processor

The Intel Core i5-8365U is a quad-core processor of the Whiskey Lake generation, whose special feature over the Core i5-8265U is the vPro support. The four cores have a nominal TDP of 15 watts and operate at a maximum of 4.1 GHz, while the base clock frequency is 1.6 GHz.

In the case of the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1, the CPU can temporarily consume up to 42 watts in the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, achieving a clock speed of 3.8 GHz. CPU temperatures rise fast to 99 °C (210.2 °F). Therefore, the clock frequency is automatically reduced gradually to 21 watts and 2.9 GHz and finally to 15 watts and 2.4 GHz.

The CPU performance of the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is not bad, per se, but could be better. Both the Surface Pro 6 and the X1 Tablet 2018 score higher, but the HP Elite x2 1013 G3 is inferior in this regard.

We could not determine a performance limitation of the processor in battery mode.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Dell Latitude 7200 Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel Core i5-8365U: Ø519 (509.77-619.48)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-8365U
  (163 - 171, n=4)
167 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Core i5-8365U
164 Points ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼98% -1%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points ∼88% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼84% -14%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 179, n=304)
106 Points ∼63% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points ∼100% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼95% +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼92% +24%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U
  (515 - 580, n=4)
558 Points ∼80% +8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points ∼74% 0%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel Core i5-8365U
515 (min: 509.77, max: 658) Points ∼74%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 830, n=313)
304 Points ∼44% -41%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
515 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
164 Points
Help

System Performance

Thanks to the fast quad-core processor, sufficient RAM and the SSD, there is nothing wrong with the system's performance. In the PCMark benchmarks, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 performed well.

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2859 - 3403, n=4)
3117 Points ∼100% +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
2952 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2939 Points ∼94% +3%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2859 Points ∼92%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2714 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=102)
2509 Points ∼80% -12%
Productivity
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6002 - 6623, n=4)
6358 Points ∼100% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6326 Points ∼99%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5698 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5509 Points ∼87% -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
5353 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7179, n=104)
5291 Points ∼83% -16%
Essentials
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7842 - 8863, n=4)
8186 Points ∼100% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8119 Points ∼99%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7919 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7460 Points ∼91% -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
7039 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9678, n=104)
6999 Points ∼85% -14%
Score
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3751 - 4086, n=4)
3871 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3782 Points ∼98%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points ∼92% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points ∼92% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4677, n=105)
3199 Points ∼83% -15%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4858 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4381 - 4911, n=3)
4717 Points ∼97% -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼88% -12%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=232)
3753 Points ∼77% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points ∼98% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3392 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3146 - 3546, n=4)
3392 Points ∼97% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=280)
2807 Points ∼81% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3392 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4858 points
Help

Storage Devices

The built-in M.2 2242 SSD comes from Western Digital. It has a capacity of 512 GB and complies with the PCIe NVMe standard. However, as the benchmarks show, this is only the PCIe 3.0 x2 standard. Thus, the maximum transfer rates remain slightly behind the competition, which should have little impact in everyday life.

Dell Latitude 7200
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-2%
9%
-29%
6%
Write 4K
131.9
95.43
-28%
90.97
-31%
83.23
-37%
135 (98.2 - 191, n=20)
2%
Read 4K
45.47
39.19
-14%
36.84
-19%
43.84
-4%
43.3 (27.6 - 53.1, n=20)
-5%
Write Seq
1021
1197
17%
636.4
-38%
1267 (750 - 1768, n=19)
24%
Read Seq
1085
1705
57%
899.7
-17%
1237 (423 - 1710, n=19)
14%
Write 4K Q32T1
444.9
399.24
-10%
355.8
-20%
192.9
-57%
401 (239 - 749, n=20)
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
366.6
260.67
-29%
256.9
-30%
247.36
-33%
417 (229 - 654, n=20)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1458
1286.9
-12%
1222
-16%
861.1
-41%
1503 (1319 - 2544, n=20)
3%
Read Seq Q32T1
1640
3024.8
84%
3460
111%
1615
-2%
1748 (473 - 3433, n=20)
7%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read: 1072 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1092 MB/s
512K Read: 806.6 MB/s
512K Write: 786 MB/s
4K Read: 42.48 MB/s
4K Write: 133.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 365.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 445.6 MB/s

GPU Performance

The only GPU option for the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is the Intel UHD Graphics 620. This integrated graphics chip has no dedicated memory and therefore resorts to the RAM. Running in dual-channel mode (like the Dell Latitude 12 7200 2-in-1), the graphics chip can achieve its maximum performance. However, it is still pretty low, rendering the GPU unsuitable for demanding tasks. Simple multimedia tasks, on the other hand, can be handled easily.

The GPU performance is not limited in battery mode.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points ∼92% +1%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1802 Points ∼91%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=173)
1716 Points ∼87% -5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=329)
1288 Points ∼65% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (85 - 1682, n=34)
499 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 431, n=33)
358 Points ∼72%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
335 Points ∼67%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼100% +3%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1160 Points ∼98%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=142)
1127 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=239)
1024 Points ∼86% -12%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=160)
9138 Points ∼89% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼89% 0%
Dell Latitude 7200
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
9128 Points ∼89%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points ∼82% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=290)
6789 Points ∼66% -26%
3DMark 11 Performance
1992 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7916 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1071 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is not suitable for gaming unless an external Thunderbolt 3 GPU is used. The integrated graphics chip is too weak to handle current games flawlessly. Even a significant reduction in graphics quality and resolution does not yield anything in most cases.

low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 67.6 34.6 29.2 9.5 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 73 43.3 19.9 17.8 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 22.1 14.7 13.1 fps

Emissions – Dell Latitude 7200 Operates Silently

System Noise

In terms of volume, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 presents itself as a very unobtrusive detachable. When the device is idle, the fan is completely switched off. It runs under load, but stays so quiet that you hardly hear it. We also could not find coil whine with this Dell PC.

Noise Level

Idle
28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB(A)
Load
30.1 / 30.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.127.528.62526.825.926.93126.225.328.84025.826.226.35025.121.924.66323.722.322.98022.721.923.510022.422.824.512522.32223.416021.921.422.720021.520.522.225024.523.222.631521.520.921.140020.519.220.250019.819.520.563019.218.519.180018.718.119.1100019.317.819.3125018.417.218.3160018.216.518.3200017.716.418.8250019.115.617.9315017.315.317.1400016.715.116.5500015.415.115.4630015.215.215.4800015.21515.11000015.114.815.11250014.914.714.91600014.714.614.8SPL30.128.830N1.31.21.3median 18.7median 17.2median 18.8Delta2.52.82.532.13329.531.432.132.230.33130.932.233.434.934.230.433.428.930.129.928.628.932.231.231.230.832.227.4282727.127.426.827.326.22826.825.426.625.72625.425.424.625.325.425.423.924.423.723.623.923.12322.622.423.122.22322.221.522.221.421.620.820.621.421.922.12020.521.921.32119.419.321.321.521.11918.921.522.722.518.418.322.721.822.217.918.121.82121.217.717.72122.522.217.617.422.521.220.917.417.321.22322.917.517.62323.623.617.817.823.620.420.517.91820.419.819.818.218.119.8191918.218.41918.518.518.618.318.518.418.418.418.318.418.418.418.218.218.418.318.418.218.218.333.533.531.830.430.433.51.81.81.51.31.31.8median 21.5median 21.6median 18.4median 18.3median 21.51.71.12.11.91.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Latitude 7200Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB

Temperature

Stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)
Stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)

Under load, the maximum temperature on the outside is 42.5 °C (108.5 °F) - this value was measured at the front of the device. On the back, i.e. the area where you hold the computer, we measured a maximum of 39.4 °C (102.92 °F). Thus, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 feels warm, but the temperatures do not reach critical levels.

In the stress test with Prime95 and FurMark, the CPU consumption is limited from the beginning to 15 watts. As a result, the maximum CPU clock rate in the stress test is 1.2 GHz. At the end of the stress test, the consumption is in the range of about 13 watts, whereby the CPU frequency is still at 800 MHz. This TDP-related throttling has no effect on everyday use.

Max. Load
 38 °C
100 F
39.2 °C
103 F
42.5 °C
109 F
 
 35 °C
95 F
36.6 °C
98 F
35.1 °C
95 F
 
 30.6 °C
87 F
30.9 °C
88 F
28.4 °C
83 F
 
Maximum: 42.5 °C = 109 F
Average: 35.1 °C = 95 F
39.4 °C
103 F
37.5 °C
100 F
37.7 °C
100 F
31.3 °C
88 F
35.2 °C
95 F
34.1 °C
93 F
28.6 °C
83 F
31 °C
88 F
30.2 °C
86 F
Maximum: 39.4 °C = 103 F
Average: 33.9 °C = 93 F
Power Supply (max.)  35.1 °C = 95 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
Under load (inside the device)
Under load (inside the device)
Under load (display)
Under load (display)
Under Load (back of the device)
Under load (back of the device)

Speakers

For a business tablet, we do not have high expectations for the speakers. The Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 ones are indeed pretty bad, because their sound is not well-balanced and not very loud. Moreover, bass is missing completely. Instead of the internal speakers, one should rather resort to external ones or headphones. These can be connected via the perfectly functioning combo audio jack.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.531.22525.926.43125.325.24026.224.55021.925.86322.325.28021.922.510022.823125222616021.435.620020.536.925023.239.631520.941.140019.246.850019.549.963018.551.780018.152.6100017.855.3125017.259.7160016.559.1200016.458250015.660.7315015.360.4400015.157.7500015.155.6630015.251800015521000014.848.41250014.748.61600014.648.5SPL28.869.2N1.222.8median 17.2median 51Delta2.87.933.331.433.330.530.930.533.830.433.832.728.632.73130.83128.927.128.928.52828.534.82634.84225.44249.523.649.551.922.451.951.321.551.352.720.652.758.620.558.658.419.358.461.818.961.869.418.369.46618.16659.717.759.761.517.461.566.317.366.368.917.668.969.117.869.163.71863.764.618.164.658.218.458.253.518.353.556.118.356.147.618.247.637.618.237.67730.47736.71.336.7median 58.4median 18.3median 58.46.71.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 7200Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Latitude 7200 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Management – Small Battery and Low Power Consumption

Power Consumption

Fortunately, the power consumption of the Dell laptop is very low. Compared to the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1, all of the competitors have much higher power consumption when idle. Dell has optimized the Latitude 12 well in this regard. Furthermore, the lower LCD resolution is likely to have a positive impact on power consumption.

For the 65-watt power supply, the maximum consumption of 51.3 watts is not a problem.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.74 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.3 / 5.8 / 6.5 Watt
Load midlight 37 / 51.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 7200
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
-38%
-25%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
3.3
4.8
-45%
4.9
-48%
3.2
3%
Idle Average *
5.8
9
-55%
8.9
-53%
8.7
-50%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
10.5
-62%
11
-69%
10.4
-60%
Load Average *
37
42.8
-16%
32
14%
29.2
21%
Load Maximum *
51.3
57.8
-13%
36
30%
40.8
20%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Charging Time: 141 minutes
Charging Time: 141 minutes

A lower power consumption is of course positive for the battery life, but the battery installed by Dell in the Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is only a rather small internal 38-watt-hour one. All of the competitors have larger batteries: The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 has 42 watt hours, the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 45 watt hours and the HP Elite x2 1013 G3 even 50 watt hours.

Thus, it is only due to the energy efficiency of the Dell Latitude laptop, that it performs slightly better than the X1 Tablet Gen 3 in our practical Wi-Fi test. Despite the much larger battery, the HP Elite x2 1013 G3 shows just a slightly better battery life. Only the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is again way more enduring in the Wi-Fi test.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
6h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 46min
Dell Latitude 7200
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
-7%
6%
23%
13%
Reader / Idle
790
781
1083
769 (117 - 2139, n=289)
H.264
489
523
7%
389
-20%
452 (206 - 1070, n=114)
-8%
WiFi v1.3
417
395
-5%
459
10%
509
22%
456 (153 - 1010, n=255)
9%
Load
106
83
-22%
137
29%
131
24%
145 (49 - 677, n=284)
37%

Pros

+ high-color LCD in 3:2 format
+ comfortable touchpad
+ high-quality case
+ good interface equipment
+ repairable
+ almost silent operation
+ fast microSD card reader
+ integrated WWAN
+ extensive warranty

Cons

- unstable keyboard cover
- glossy LCD surface
- lower display brightness compared to market competitors
- CPU performance lower compared to test competitors

Verdict

In review: Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. Test model provided by Dell.
In review: Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. Test model provided by Dell.

A Surface clone? Dell would probably stay away from that description for the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 even though it suits the device. Dell adapts the basic principle of the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 with its strengths and weaknesses.

One of the strengths of this device category is definitely the display, which also in the case of the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 has the comfortable 3:2 format and a high color space coverage. The disadvantage, however, is the glossy surface and the lower brightness compared to the competitors, even if the Dell computer certainly does not perform too bad here. A weak point, however, is the keyboard. The lack of stability of the keyboard cover has a very negative effect on the typing experience. These two points represent the most obvious separation from "real" laptops like the Dell Latitude 7300.

In the convertible tablet device class, the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 impresses with its good connectivity and good maintainability. We also rate positive the almost silent operation, the high-quality case, the comfortable touchpad and the extensive warranty of the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1. The fast microSD card reader and the built-in WWAN are advantages as well. Negative in our view is the CPU performance, which is worse than, for example, the Microsoft Surface Pro 6.

Dell makes no mistakes here, which is why we can say in good conscience: The Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 is recommended.

In conclusion, we can recommend the Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 as a very good business tablet. As a buyer, of course, you have to be aware of your priorities. If you put a bigger emphasis on the screen, then a tablet could be a better solution. If this is the keyboard, then you would be probably better off with a normal laptop like the Dell Latitude 7300.

Dell Latitude 7200 - 09/26/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
75 / 75 → 99%
Weight
73 / 20-75 → 96%
Battery
74%
Display
88%
Games Performance
51 / 78 → 65%
Application Performance
77 / 85 → 91%
Temperature
93%
Noise
99%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Average
78%
89%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 Laptop Review: The hybrid device leaves a good impression despite its yielding keyboard
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-09-30 (Update: 2019-09-30)