Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is a dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP3) that was launched in September 2020. It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading). Each core can clock from 3 GHz (base speed) to 4.1 GHz (single- and dual-core boost). The faster Core i5 and i7 models offer more cores and are therefore significantly faster.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1115G4 Intel is naming the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. GPU and CPU can together use the 6 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and WiFi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Performance

Multi-thread peformance is most comparable to what the Intel Core i5-8250U and the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U deliver. This makes the i3 a more than decent option for day-to-day tasks; that said, any workload of the more taxing kind (such as exporting a high-bitrate, hour long UHD video) will be enough to bring the i3 to its knees.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the ThinkPad L15 G2-20X4S0KU00 is one of the fastest laptops powered by the 1115G4 we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs.

The Core i3-1115G4 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4020Intel Core i3-1115G4
CodenameGemini Lake refreshTiger Lake-UP3
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz3000 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP6 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1090BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache160 KB
L3 Cache6 MB
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
15.6 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.1 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
616 Points (1%)
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
308 Points (13%)
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (55%)     max: 1319 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (55%)     max: 515 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 78.9 Points
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (53%)     max: 197 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2184 Points (13%)
8018 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4427 Points (3%)
16265 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
932 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29.7 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
766 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4498 MIPS (3%)
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2456 MIPS (29%)
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (54%)     max: 4674 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
50.1 fps (1%)
141.6 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4064 Seconds (29%)
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2495 Points (5%)
6331 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1220 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
16869 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (14%)     max: 6640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (53%)     max: 66161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1286 Points (3%)
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
476 Points (2%)
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
400 Points (10%)
1786 Points (43%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
706 Points (3%)
3428 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (18%)     max: 475 Points
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (50%)     max: 1352 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
5601 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (3%)     max: 3462 Points
9945 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (43%)     max: 59497 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (15%)     max: 61.1 Points
152.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (14%)     max: 84.2 Points
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (37%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (39%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.5 Watt (2%)
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.1 Watt (2%)
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (7%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 330% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 09. 09:02:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759993332s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.016s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#10 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.076s

#13 return log +0.008s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)