Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Core 3 N355 vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core 3 N355

► remove from comparison Intel Core 3 N355

The Intel Core 3 N355 (sometimes referred to as the Intel Processor N355) is a mobile processor of the Twin Lake family which is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The chip is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs; it offers 8 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.9 GHz but no Performance cores.

The E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

The performance of the Core 3 CPU depends heavily on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Provided both are good enough, it will deliver multi-thread benchmark cores on par with older quad-core CPUs like the Ryzen 3 5300U and Core i7-1165G7, which should be enough to run most day-to-day tasks in 2025. Its single-core performance is much less impressive due to the lack of P-cores.

The Alder Lake-N Core i3-N305 (8 cores, up to 3.8 GHz) that was introduced in early 2023 should be just a few percentage points slower than the N355.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 32 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.35 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for older games and fairly low resolutions. GTA V is perfectly playable at 768p on Medium.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The Intel Core 3 N355 is supposed to consume 15 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. While no data on PL2 has been provided, we do know that Asus has given the Core 3 a power limit of 35 watts (PL2) in the NUC 14 Essential.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4115Intel Core 3 N355Intel Celeron N4100
CodenameGemini LakeTwin LakeGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 3 N355 « 3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 2500 MHz3000 - 3900 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
TDP10 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1264BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) ( - 1350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L3 Cache6 MB
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 3 N355
27.2 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
15.7 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
66 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
334 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5262 Points (5%)
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1039 Points (44%)
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
393 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
2015 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
822 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
168 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
11.2 Points (14%)
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
2.1 Points (49%)
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (20%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2087 Points (13%)
5770 Points (35%)
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7426 Points (5%)
26431 Points (19%)
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40876 Points (26%)
10929 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9010 Points (11%)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
564 s (7%)
242.2 s (3%)
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19.1 s (4%)
8.3 s (2%)
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1203 Points (2%)
3463 Points (5%)
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
23225 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
4044 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.5 fps (6%)
57.6 fps (19%)
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (4%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
209 fps (48%)
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (13%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
5.9 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
0.5 GB/s (16%)
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
1.1 GB/s (19%)
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
5.9 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1121 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
574 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
0.8 sec (17%)
min: 1.75     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (38%)     max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3683 Points (8%)
8507 Points (18%)
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.4 s (6%)
17.1 s (4%)
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
63.3 s (3%)
35.5 s (2%)
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1472 s (7%)
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
28501 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
9920 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
27642 Points (22%)
57287 Points (47%)
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
57560 Points (47%)
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62307 Points (52%)
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (20%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
8433 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
11682 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1063 Points (4%)
3827 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1319     avg: 1332     median: 1331.5 (33%)     max: 1344 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 4513     avg: 4801     median: 4800.5 (19%)     max: 5088 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
328 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
833 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (16%)     max: 410 Points
1082 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
4903 Points (9%)
min: 1082     avg: 1267     median: 1271 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1073 Points (5%)
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4891 Points (15%)
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4824 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
18845 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (20%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (7%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (32%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
968 ms (1%)
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (9%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
149.3 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
182.4 Points (33%)
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (14%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
907 Points (34%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.1 Watt (2%)
31.9 Watt (6%)
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.2 Watt (2%)
35.6 Watt (6%)
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)
23.1 Points per Watt (17%)
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 3 N355 → 291% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 85% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 10. 06:29:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18745 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752121777s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18745 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 18745 +0.005s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.014s ... 0.045s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.125s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.125s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)