Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement25.10.2023 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 948     avg: 1548     median: 1633 (4%)     max: 1826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 15108     avg: 18720     median: 19025.5 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
min: 635     avg: 1130     median: 1196.5 (1%)     max: 1592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3991     avg: 4766     median: 4765 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
min: 189     avg: 331.9     median: 351.5 (0%)     max: 411 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 4769     avg: 7999     median: 8264 (4%)     max: 8791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
948 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 9984     avg: 16072     median: 17279 (73%)     max: 20131 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 22388     avg: 29111     median: 29081 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
17553 Points (86%)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
29890 Points (100%)
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 36     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 75.5     median: 77 (14%)     max: 96 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 187     median: 188.5 (14%)     max: 241 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.3     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 141.3     median: 147 (14%)     max: 167 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.6     median: 19 (2%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 239.1     median: 247.5 (5%)     max: 292 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.6     median: 34 (1%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 315.5     median: 326 (14%)     max: 388 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.6     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 189     avg: 479.2     median: 498 (4%)     max: 549 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.5     median: 92 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 415471     avg: 762370     median: 774427 (53%)     max: 927463 Points
min: 82963     avg: 86686     median: 83866 (6%)     max: 92006 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 14095     median: 14184 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 15806     median: 16169 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (30%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.24     avg: 9.2     median: 9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 12% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
64%
Adreno 619:
19.9 20 29.8 45 54 ~ 34 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
60%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
44%
Adreno 619:
19.6 20 28 29.3 30 ~ 25 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
44%
Adreno 619:
29 29.6 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
60  fps
67%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
53%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 29.7 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
113%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
51%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 61%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%

Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal603030
Genshin Impact5359.857343625
PUBG Mobile88605840394031
Dead Trigger 28090
Asphalt 9: Legends59.43030
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4


2


2
1
1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 08. 04:00:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765162831s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Dec 2025 05:19:22 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.041s ... 0.064s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.073s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.089s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.089s

#17 Got 187 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.115s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.115s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.116s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.12s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)