Verdict - Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
With the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G, the manufacturer is demonstrating that a low price and very long battery life aren't mutually exclusive. And that it's certainly feasible to offer a powerful mobile phone battery in Europe, even though numerous manufacturers have moved away from this in recent months.
The battery life is indeed very impressive and can easily keep going for two or three days of normal use, long movie sessions, or an afternoon playing your favorite game.
The screen is large, quite bright, and doesn't exhibit PWM flickering.
Apart from that, much of the Redmi 15 5G is merely functional. For example, the occasionally creaky, no-frills plastic chassis, or the cameras which offer rather mediocre image quality.
You also have to make do with a few compromises in terms of performance, both when it comes to the processor and the memory. The speakers aren't exactly a sound marvel either, but the phone does, at least, stay quite cool.
Xiaomi has clearly made strong battery life a focal point with its Redmi 15 5G, and if that's your top priority, you'll find it tough to come across a better smartphone for $200.
By the way, the Redmi 15 5G is, of course, not fireproof – our pictures of an artificial fire are only for show.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
At the time of reviewing, the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is currently unavailable to purchase on Amazon.
Table of Contents
- Verdict - Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
- Specifications
- Case – Boring plastic
- Features – The Redmi 15 has two storage variants
- Software – A lot of advertizing out of the box
- Communication and GNSS – Mobile diversity
- Telephone functions and voice quality – Speak up a bit
- Cameras – A lonely main lens
- Accessories and warranty – The Redmi 15 comes without a charger
- Input devices and operation – A reliable fingerprint sensor
- Display – Fine details without PWM
- Performance – Not that much power
- Games – For casual gaming
- Emissions – Good heat dissipation
- Battery runtimes – Redmi 15 5G is a runtime king
- Notebookcheck overall rating
- Possible alternatives compared
It's been quite a while since a Redmi phone came from a purely numbered series. With Xiaomi's Redmi 15 5G focusing on its powerful battery, let's now take a look at the compromises you'll have to deal with for a price of around $200.
Specifications
Case – Boring plastic
Xiaomi has chosen a plastic case for its Redmi 15 5G, and it comes in black, reddish titanium gray, and green with a light marbling effect. The chassis doesn't feel particularly high-quality, but it's decent for the price range.
Pressure placed on the rear side is quickly absorbed by the screen's liquid crystal, and twisting it can cause a quiet creaking noise to emit from the smartphone.
Xiaomi boasts its smartphone as having IP64, which means it's well protected against dust and dirt, as well as rain. However, you should definitely not throw the phone into water. And we should add, don't throw it into a fire either. We used an artificial fire for our photos.
Having a 6.9-inch screen means the phone's dimensions are slightly larger than other smartphones in this price range, and the weight is also higher at 224 grams.
Features – The Redmi 15 has two storage variants
The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is available in two storage variants:
- Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G – 128 GB of mass storage / 4 GB of RAM
- Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G – 256 GB of mass storage / 8 GB of RAM
The current online price difference is around $20. If possible, we would recommend our larger storage configuration review model.
A USB 2.0 port is built into the case and is used for charging as well as data transfer. Video signals cannot be output via this port.
microSD Card Reader
You can insert either two SIM cards or one SIM and a microSD card, but the Redmi 15 5G doesn't support eSIM.
The card reader can expand the storage by up to 2 TB and operates at average speeds.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Software – A lot of advertizing out of the box
The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G runs Android 15 and Xiaomi's HyperOS 2 skin. It does numerous things differently from stock Android, including significantly redesigning the settings menu.
Unfortunately, more than a dozen apps and games from third-party developers like Amazon or Temu are pre-installed, which means you must first uninstall them if they're surplus to your requirements.
Xiaomi has promised updates for the Redmi 15 until 2031, which is six years from launch. There are also expected to be two new Android versions, up to Android 17. Given the low price, the update promise is reasonable, but how the device will be affected by the new EU guidelines remains to be seen.
Sustainability
There is currently no Redmi 15 5G entry in the EU's EPREL database. We were also unable to find any data regarding its lifetime CO² equivalent emissions.
One plus is the plastic-free packaging.
Communication and GNSS – Mobile diversity
Unfortunately, you don't get anything more than Wi-Fi 5 as a fast Wi-Fi standard. This allows for speeds of up to 340 Mbps. However, in our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, these were also repeatedly accompanied by drops below 100 Mbps.
As the name of the test device already indicates, the phone can also connect to 5G mobile networks and offers numerous frequencies, and this means it can usually be used abroad.
Compared to high-end phones, reception was rather mediocre in various samples during our test. In challenging situations, such as narrow alleys, the reception can be patchy, but you can still make calls with other phones.
Networking | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Outdoors, we were located quite quickly with an accuracy of 3 meters. All major satellite networks are available, but SBAS for even greater accuracy is absent.
Curious to discover how the Redmi 15 5G's positioning works in everyday life, we hopped on our bikes. We were accompanied on the trip by the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch that usually provides very accurate positioning.
The Redmi 15 5G also did quite well in more open terrain, and although we occasionally seemed to ride through front gardens, this deviation was only a few meters from the actual route.
The phone struggled a bit in narrow old town streets, but overall, the accuracy was absolutely sufficient for everyday navigation, as long as you don't require absolute precision.
Telephone functions and voice quality – Speak up a bit
For the phone app, Xiaomi leans on Google's standard application. It contains all the essential features and is intuitive to use.
While measuring the call quality in a few test calls, we noticed our caller often sounded a bit muffled through the earpiece, but our voice was recorded quite clearly. Background noise should be avoided as much as possible, since it is only filtered out moderately.
The caller was very easy to understand through both the speaker and the hands-free microphone. Our voice was occasionally recorded a bit quietly, so we had to speak up.
Cameras – A lonely main lens
At first glance, the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G appears to have three camera lenses on the back. However, that's not the case, because there's only a single 50-megapixel camera and a backup lens for blur effects. A dedicated wide-angle or macro camera is nowhere to be seen.
The main camera produces moderately detailed images in good lighting conditions, but sometimes lacks sharpness. However, in low-light and high contrast situations, the level of detail is quite good, and in dark areas, some details are even visible, and a candle flame doesn't overpower the camera.
Videos are possible at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps. The image quality is acceptable, but the autofocus is occasionally too slow.
The front camera takes decent selfies, although some of them appear a bit blurry. On the positive side, however, the image quality works quite well in both bright and dark areas.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera Low-lightEven in studio light, the results can be rather mixed. The test chart appears patchy in places, and the contrast of text against a red background collapses. In addition, the sharpness of details is rather mediocre.
Shots taken at just one lux brightness allow the subject to be just barely recognized, and can hardly be considered usable.


Accessories and warranty – The Redmi 15 comes without a charger
In Europe, Xiaomi doesn't include a charger, but does include a protective case, a charging cable, and a SIM card reader.
The manufacturer is traditionally rather stingy, offering only a 12-month warranty for its smartphones purchased in the EU.
Input devices and operation – A reliable fingerprint sensor
The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G's large 6.9-inch screen can display up to 144 frames per second and responds very quickly to inputs. The touchscreen is very comfortable to use, and the system speed is usually sufficient to allow smooth operation.
The fingerprint sensor is located on the right-hand side of the smartphone's standby button. It's positioned a bit more conveniently for right-handed users than for lefties, who will likely prefer to use their index or middle fingers. Once a finger has been trained, the sensor recognizes it without fail and unlocks the phone almost instantly.
Facial recognition can also be used for biometric unlocking. However, this is only possible via the front camera without additional sensors and is therefore not quite as secure.
Display – Fine details without PWM
With 2,340 x 1,080 pixels and a pixel density of 374 PPI, the smartphone possesses a fine-resolution display.
It's an IPS panel, which means it doesn't quite reach the brightness levels seen in other AMOLED screen smartphones in this price range: The brightness for a solid white area peaks at just under 700 cd/m², while for smaller areas, it can hit just over 800 cd/m².
But, on the plus side, the screen is PWM-free.
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 692 cd/m²
Contrast: 1821:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.18 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
CCT: 7530 K
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G56 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 13% | 49% | 2% | 58% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 692 | 691 0% | 1147 66% | 853 23% | 1157 67% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 665 | 672 1% | 1146 72% | 793 19% | 1151 73% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 92 -1% | 96 3% | 89 -4% | 97 4% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.38 | 0.54 -42% | |||
Contrast (:1) | 1821 | 1580 -13% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.18 | 3.15 25% | 1.6 62% | 4.21 -1% | 1.1 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.55 | 4.41 33% | 3.7 44% | 6.69 -2% | 2.4 63% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 3.6 18% | 2.3 48% | 3 32% | 1.6 64% |
Gamma | 2.286 96% | 2.041 108% | 2.27 97% | 2.175 101% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 7530 86% | 6507 100% | 6368 102% | 6750 96% | 6622 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8170 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.3 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.1 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). |
Performance – Not that much power
You shouldn't expect too much from the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3. This is a budget smartphone SoC, and that's highlighted in the Redmi 15 5G's performance. While smooth operation is usually possible, running multiple apps simultaneously or performing demanding tasks quickly leaves the phone overwhelmed.
Many similarly priced phones also offer a bit more power.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (5689 - 5702, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
Graphics performance is decent for this price range. Graphically demanding tasks such as high-resolution rendering aren't the affordable Redmi 15 5G's strengths, but that's probably not to be expected at this price.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
Surfing the internet with the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is usually a ton of fun, as even larger pages load quite quickly and images are also available quickly when scrolling.
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (110.5 - 113.9, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (91.8 - 109, n=2) |
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (5.55 - 7.45, n=2) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (95 - 98, n=2) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (34162 - 36850, n=2) | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63) | |
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (1096 - 1172, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141) | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140) |
* ... smaller is better
Thanks to the UFS 2.2 standard, you should be able to enjoy fast data transfers and short loading times. However, although the storage appears impressive on paper, the Redmi 15 5G's storage controller doesn't play ball. It significantly slows down the storage, which means you'll still often have to wait.
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | Motorola Moto G56 | Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -36% | 60% | 59% | 69% | 50% | 188% | |
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 525.5 | 528.2 1% | 950.62 81% | 1013.35 93% | 987.81 88% | 908 ? 73% | 2208 ? 320% |
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 496.5 | 170.7 -66% | 792.56 60% | 859.11 73% | 943.43 90% | 728 ? 47% | 1818 ? 266% |
Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 139.4 | 134.7 -3% | 257.91 85% | 230.68 65% | 243.98 75% | 229 ? 64% | 294 ? 111% |
Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 218.7 | 56.4 -74% | 245.16 12% | 226.19 3% | 265.26 21% | 249 ? 14% | 339 ? 55% |
Games – For casual gaming
The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G isn't exactly a true gaming phone. Playing the demanding Genshin Impact, we only achieved around 20fps even at the lowest settings. The game stuttered noticeably and was barely playable, especially during battles. PUBG Mobile still managed around 30fps at all settings.
We tested the frame rates with the GameBench software.
Games can be controlled via the touchscreen, and, if necessary, the position sensor works smoothly and reliably.
Emissions – Good heat dissipation
Temperature
In our test, the case barely heated up even after extended load, and we measured a maximum of 40.3°C. While this can be a bit higher on hot days, the Redmi 15 5G is generally well-cooled.
The 3DMark stress tests also showed no significant drops in results. This means we can assume that the SoC maintains a constant maximum performance.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Stress Tests
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
Motorola Moto G56 |
Speakers
Unfortunately, the speaker only produces mono sound that's a bit high-pitched. Although you can listen to pop music, the phone doesn't sound particularly powerful.
Even with movie sound, you quickly miss the punch, but speech is at least quite understandable.
If you wish to connect external speakers or headphones, you can do so via the USB port or wirelessly via Bluetooth. In our tests, both worked without issues.
For wireless audio transmission, the phone supports the most important audio codecs, including some HD audio-capable options such as LDAC and aptX HD.
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery runtimes – Redmi 15 5G is a runtime king
Power consumption
The Redmi 15 5G's power consumption is normal to moderate for a smartphone in this performance class.
The smartphone can be charged at a maximum of 33 watts, and it can sometimes take more than three hours to fully recharge, due to the large battery.
The generous power storage also has the advantage of allowing the Redmi 15 5G to be used as a power bank because wired reverse charging is possible at up to 18 watts.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G56 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -4% | 2% | 5% | 5% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.1 | 1 9% | 1.15 -5% | 1 9% | 1.14 -4% | 1.05 ? 5% | 0.856 ? 22% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.55 -11% | 1.3 7% | 1.3 7% | 1.3 ? 7% | 1.437 ? -3% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.9 | 1.6 16% | 1.57 17% | 1.9 -0% | 1.34 29% | 1.65 ? 13% | 1.612 ? 15% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 3.8 | 4.9 -29% | 3.87 -2% | 3.5 8% | 2.96 22% | 3.6 ? 5% | 7.1 ? -87% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 6.4 | 8.1 -27% | 7.66 -20% | 7.2 -13% | 8.18 -28% | 6.6 ? -3% | 11.2 ? -75% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Battery life
Many smartphones have recently been released in Germany, housing smaller batteries, but not the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G. It boasts a very large 7,000 mAh battery, allowing it to offer long battery life.
Specifically, the phone achieved a runtime of over 21 hours in our Wi-Fi test, which helped it last two or three days without charging. You can watch movies from the internal storage for almost 30 hours, meaning you could watch all the Harry Potter films and the Lord of the Rings Extended Versions back to back without the battery running out.
Even under heavy load, the battery life is excellent: For example, you can play games for over 7 hours before the lights go out.
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Moto G56 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery runtime | -33% | -32% | -12% | -21% | |
Reader / Idle (h) | 40.9 | 33.7 -18% | 30 -27% | 34.7 -15% | |
H.264 (h) | 29.7 | 17.9 -40% | 17 -43% | 22.9 -23% | |
WiFi v1.3 (h) | 21.1 | 13.2 -37% | 12.9 -39% | 18.5 -12% | 17.4 -18% |
Load (h) | 7.3 | 4.5 -38% | 6 -18% | 5.2 -29% |
Notebookcheck overall rating
The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G's clear priority is to offer the best possible battery life at the lowest possible price.
This comes at the cost of compromises in other areas. But if battery life is your top priority, you get a decent smartphone too.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
- 10/21/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 2. $11.99 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 3. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 250€ | 224 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" 2340x1080 374 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $230.00 List Price: 209€ | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $5.59 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... 2. $3.59 Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Redmi No... 3. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $5.69 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... 3. $5.97 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... List Price: 250 Euro | 200 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 391 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco M7 P... 2. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... 3. $11.99 Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 P... List Price: 240€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.