Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G smartphone review – A hot candidate for the runtime throne

You can have a bigger battery.

Europe only ever gets phones with smaller batteries? Xiaomi shows that doesn't have to be the case, since the Redmi 15 5G comes with a powerful 7,000 mAh battery. Our review reveals what this means for the battery life and what else this relatively affordable phone has to offer.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict - Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G

With the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G, the manufacturer is demonstrating that a low price and very long battery life aren't mutually exclusive. And that it's certainly feasible to offer a powerful mobile phone battery in Europe, even though numerous manufacturers have moved away from this in recent months.

The battery life is indeed very impressive and can easily keep going for two or three days of normal use, long movie sessions, or an afternoon playing your favorite game.

The screen is large, quite bright, and doesn't exhibit PWM flickering.

Apart from that, much of the Redmi 15 5G is merely functional. For example, the occasionally creaky, no-frills plastic chassis, or the cameras which offer rather mediocre image quality.

You also have to make do with a few compromises in terms of performance, both when it comes to the processor and the memory. The speakers aren't exactly a sound marvel either, but the phone does, at least, stay quite cool. 

Xiaomi has clearly made strong battery life a focal point with its Redmi 15 5G, and if that's your top priority, you'll find it tough to come across a better smartphone for $200.

By the way, the Redmi 15 5G is, of course, not fireproof – our pictures of an artificial fire are only for show.

Pros

+ huge battery and great runtimes
+ wired reverse charging
+ good heat dissipation
+ 144 Hz display with good brightness
+ no PWM flickering
+ reliable fingerprint sensor
+ 5G with multiple bands
+ update promise until 2031
+ relatively affordable

Cons

- mono speaker with mediocre sound
- only one rear camera...
- ... with poor sharpness
- relatively low performance
- slow storage
- many pre-installed third-party apps
- creaking plastic case
- no eSIM support

Price and availability

At the time of reviewing, the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is currently unavailable to purchase on Amazon. 

It's been quite a while since a Redmi phone came from a purely numbered series. With Xiaomi's Redmi 15 5G focusing on its powerful battery, let's now take a look at the compromises you'll have to deal with for a price of around $200.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Redmi 15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.3 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 374 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 2TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Virtual proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 171.1 x 82.1 ( = 0.34 x 6.74 x 3.23 in)
Battery
7000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33 Watt charging, 18W reverse charging with cable
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM tool, USB cable, bumper, 12 Months Warranty, IP64 certified; SAR: 0.998W/​kg Head, 0.996W/​kg Body, fanless
Weight
224 g ( = 7.9 oz / 0.49 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Boring plastic

Xiaomi has chosen a plastic case for its Redmi 15 5G, and it comes in black, reddish titanium gray, and green with a light marbling effect. The chassis doesn't feel particularly high-quality, but it's decent for the price range.

Pressure placed on the rear side is quickly absorbed by the screen's liquid crystal, and twisting it can cause a quiet creaking noise to emit from the smartphone.

Xiaomi boasts its smartphone as having IP64, which means it's well protected against dust and dirt, as well as rain. However, you should definitely not throw the phone into water. And we should add, don't throw it into a fire either. We used an artificial fire for our photos.

Having a 6.9-inch screen means the phone's dimensions are slightly larger than other smartphones in this price range, and the weight is also higher at 224 grams.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review
Xiaomi Redmi 15 review

Size comparison

171.1 mm / 6.74 in 82.1 mm / 3.23 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 224 g0.4938 lbs165.8 mm / 6.53 in 76.3 mm / 3 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 200 g0.4409 lbs164.4 mm / 6.47 in 77.9 mm / 3.07 in 7.5 mm / 0.2953 in 192 g0.4233 lbs162.4 mm / 6.39 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 190 g0.4189 lbs162.4 mm / 6.39 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 190 g0.4189 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features – The Redmi 15 has two storage variants

The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is available in two storage variants:

  • Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G – 128 GB of mass storage / 4 GB of RAM
  • Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G – 256 GB of mass storage / 8 GB of RAM

The current online price difference is around $20. If possible, we would recommend our larger storage configuration review model.

A USB 2.0 port is built into the case and is used for charging as well as data transfer. Video signals cannot be output via this port.

Top: Infrared blaster
Top: Infrared blaster
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C port, microphone
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C port, microphone
Left: SIM slot
Left: SIM slot
Right: Standby button, volume rocker
Right: Standby button, volume rocker

microSD Card Reader

You can insert either two SIM cards or one SIM and a microSD card, but the Redmi 15 5G doesn't support eSIM.

The card reader can expand the storage by up to 2 TB and operates at average speeds.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.86 MB/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330 (Angelbird V60)
55.9 MB/s +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
42.1 MB/s
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.72 - 58.9, n=65, last 2 years)
32.6 MB/s -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s -29%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.1 (16.6-46.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73 (55.1-82.2)

Software – A lot of advertizing out of the box

The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G runs Android 15 and Xiaomi's HyperOS 2 skin. It does numerous things differently from stock Android, including significantly redesigning the settings menu.

Unfortunately, more than a dozen apps and games from third-party developers like Amazon or Temu are pre-installed, which means you must first uninstall them if they're surplus to your requirements.

Xiaomi has promised updates for the Redmi 15 until 2031, which is six years from launch. There are also expected to be two new Android versions, up to Android 17. Given the low price, the update promise is reasonable, but how the device will be affected by the new EU guidelines remains to be seen.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G software
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G software
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G software

Sustainability

There is currently no Redmi 15 5G entry in the EU's EPREL database. We were also unable to find any data regarding its lifetime CO² equivalent emissions.

One plus is the plastic-free packaging.

Communication and GNSS – Mobile diversity

Unfortunately, you don't get anything more than Wi-Fi 5 as a fast Wi-Fi standard. This allows for speeds of up to 340 Mbps. However, in our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, these were also repeatedly accompanied by drops below 100 Mbps.

As the name of the test device already indicates, the phone can also connect to 5G mobile networks and offers numerous frequencies, and this means it can usually be used abroad.

Compared to high-end phones, reception was rather mediocre in various samples during our test. In challenging situations, such as narrow alleys, the reception can be patchy, but you can still make calls with other phones.

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
309 (min: 81) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
304 (min: 83) MBit/s ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
305 (min: 213) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
243 (min: 170) MBit/s ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
351 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼47%
Motorola Moto G56
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
225 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
366 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼49%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
744 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (81-329)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (83-343)
GPS outdoor test
GPS outdoor test
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Outdoors, we were located quite quickly with an accuracy of 3 meters. All major satellite networks are available, but SBAS for even greater accuracy is absent.

Curious to discover how the Redmi 15 5G's positioning works in everyday life, we hopped on our bikes. We were accompanied on the trip by the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch that usually provides very accurate positioning.

The Redmi 15 5G also did quite well in more open terrain, and although we occasionally seemed to ride through front gardens, this deviation was only a few meters from the actual route.

The phone struggled a bit in narrow old town streets, but overall, the accuracy was absolutely sufficient for everyday navigation, as long as you don't require absolute precision.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Overview
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Overview
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Turning point
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Turning point
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Bridge
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G positioning – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Bridge

Telephone functions and voice quality – Speak up a bit

For the phone app, Xiaomi leans on Google's standard application. It contains all the essential features and is intuitive to use.

While measuring the call quality in a few test calls, we noticed our caller often sounded a bit muffled through the earpiece, but our voice was recorded quite clearly. Background noise should be avoided as much as possible, since it is only filtered out moderately.

The caller was very easy to understand through both the speaker and the hands-free microphone. Our voice was occasionally recorded a bit quietly, so we had to speak up.

Cameras – A lonely main lens

Front camera image
Front camera image

At first glance, the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G appears to have three camera lenses on the back. However, that's not the case, because there's only a single 50-megapixel camera and a backup lens for blur effects. A dedicated wide-angle or macro camera is nowhere to be seen.

The main camera produces moderately detailed images in good lighting conditions, but sometimes lacks sharpness. However, in low-light and high contrast situations, the level of detail is quite good, and in dark areas, some details are even visible, and a candle flame doesn't overpower the camera.

Videos are possible at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps. The image quality is acceptable, but the autofocus is occasionally too slow.

The front camera takes decent selfies, although some of them appear a bit blurry. On the positive side, however, the image quality works quite well in both bright and dark areas.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera Low-light

Even in studio light, the results can be rather mixed. The test chart appears patchy in places, and the contrast of text against a red background collapses. In addition, the sharpness of details is rather mediocre.

Shots taken at just one lux brightness allow the subject to be just barely recognized, and can hardly be considered usable.

ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G: 6.04 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 9.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.8 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
23 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G: 46.07 ∆E min: 12.79 - max: 88.49 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – The Redmi 15 comes without a charger

In Europe, Xiaomi doesn't include a charger, but does include a protective case, a charging cable, and a SIM card reader.

The manufacturer is traditionally rather stingy, offering only a 12-month warranty for its smartphones purchased in the EU.

Input devices and operation – A reliable fingerprint sensor

The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G's large 6.9-inch screen can display up to 144 frames per second and responds very quickly to inputs. The touchscreen is very comfortable to use, and the system speed is usually sufficient to allow smooth operation.

The fingerprint sensor is located on the right-hand side of the smartphone's standby button. It's positioned a bit more conveniently for right-handed users than for lefties, who will likely prefer to use their index or middle fingers. Once a finger has been trained, the sensor recognizes it without fail and unlocks the phone almost instantly.

Facial recognition can also be used for biometric unlocking. However, this is only possible via the front camera without additional sensors and is therefore not quite as secure.

Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display – Fine details without PWM

Subpixel arrangement
Subpixel arrangement

With 2,340 x 1,080 pixels and a pixel density of 374 PPI, the smartphone possesses a fine-resolution display.

It's an IPS panel, which means it doesn't quite reach the brightness levels seen in other AMOLED screen smartphones in this price range: The brightness for a solid white area peaks at just under 700 cd/m², while for smaller areas, it can hit just over 800 cd/m².

But, on the plus side, the screen is PWM-free.

674
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 692 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 665 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 692 cd/m²
Contrast: 1821:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.18 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
CCT: 7530 K
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G56
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
13%
49%
2%
58%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
692
691
0%
1147
66%
853
23%
1157
67%
Brightness (cd/m²)
665
672
1%
1146
72%
793
19%
1151
73%
Brightness Distribution (%)
93
92
-1%
96
3%
89
-4%
97
4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.38
0.54
-42%
Contrast (:1)
1821
1580
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.18
3.15
25%
1.6
62%
4.21
-1%
1.1
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.55
4.41
33%
3.7
44%
6.69
-2%
2.4
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.4
3.6
18%
2.3
48%
3
32%
1.6
64%
Gamma
2.286 96%
2.041 108%
2.27 97%
2.175 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
7530 86%
6507 100%
6368 102%
6750 96%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8170 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

We detected a slight blue tint on the color display, but overall, the accuracy is good enough for everyday use. There are also a few settings options allowing you to adjust the color display to your own taste.

CalMAN grayscales
CalMAN grayscales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.3 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.1 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

The screen brightness is sufficient for outdoor use on cloudy days, and the displayed images are still clearly visible even from very wide viewing angles.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance – Not that much power

You shouldn't expect too much from the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3. This is a budget smartphone SoC, and that's highlighted in the Redmi 15 5G's performance. While smooth operation is usually possible, running multiple apps simultaneously or performing demanding tasks quickly leaves the phone overwhelmed.

Many similarly priced phones also offer a bit more power.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3803, n=202, last 2 years)
1699 Points +81%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1038 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
988 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
959 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
940 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (940 - 940, n=2)
940 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=202, last 2 years)
4971 Points +136%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2400 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
2299 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
2104 Points
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
2093 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (2067 - 2104, n=2)
2086 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)
1403375 Points +191%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
500994 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
483789 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
481665 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (481436 - 481665, n=2)
481551 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
448064 Points -7%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=183, last 2 years)
14574 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13629 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
12644 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (12367 - 12644, n=2)
12506 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
11683 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
11134 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -16%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=143, last 2 years)
7370 Points +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (4019 - 4147, n=2)
4083 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
4019 Points
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
3875 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
3859 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3847 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -8%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=143, last 2 years)
11096 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
8845 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (6633 - 8686, n=2)
7660 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
7621 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7294 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
6633 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=143, last 2 years)
8365 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6541 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
5871 Points
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
5851 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (5162 - 5871, n=2)
5517 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
5276 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=143, last 2 years)
24487 Points +412%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
4786 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (4772 - 4786, n=2)
4779 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4140 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
4087 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
2963 Points -38%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=143, last 2 years)
1665 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
1446 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
1400 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (1382 - 1400, n=2)
1391 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
1367 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1109 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=134, last 2 years)
19638 Points +244%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
6394 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6034 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
5702 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (5689 - 5702, n=2)
5696 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
5194 Points -9%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=123, last 2 years)
27604 Points +6174%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
1023 Points +133%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +132%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
829 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
440 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (421 - 440, n=2)
431 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
362 Points -18%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 5210, n=36, last 2 years)
879 Points +571%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
254 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
205 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
131 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (n=1)
131 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (132 - 35890, n=36, last 2 years)
3963 Points +2902%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
305 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
210 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
132 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (n=1)
132 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=36, last 2 years)
5716 Points +1462%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
508 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
366 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (n=1)
366 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
133 Points -64%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)
884 Points +1172%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
78.1 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
69.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (n=1)
69.5 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points -3%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 12845, n=66, last 2 years)
4021 Points +2085%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
267 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
234 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 8192
184 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  (n=1)
184 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
55.6 Points -70%

Graphics performance is decent for this price range. Graphically demanding tasks such as high-resolution rendering aren't the affordable Redmi 15 5G's strengths, but that's probably not to be expected at this price.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
411 Points
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
351 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
419 Points
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
364 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1592 Points
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1348 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
70 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
49 fps -42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
74 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps +36%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +22%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -8%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -30%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.8 fps
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3 fps -21%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.9 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.4 fps -37%

Surfing the internet with the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G is usually a ton of fun, as even larger pages load quite quickly and images are also available quickly when scrolling.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years)
153.7 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
113.949 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (110.5 - 113.9, n=2)
112.2 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
108.784 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
105.344 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
97.653 Points -14%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=129, last 2 years)
208 runs/min +91%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
114 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
112 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
109 runs/min
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
108 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (91.8 - 109, n=2)
100.4 runs/min -8%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=118, last 2 years)
13.9 runs/min +87%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
7.45 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
7.45 runs/min
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
7.16 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
7.07 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (5.55 - 7.45, n=2)
6.5 runs/min -13%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=142, last 2 years)
143.7 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
107 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
102 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
102 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
98 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (95 - 98, n=2)
96.5 Points -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=195, last 2 years)
47374 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
36850 Points
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
36734 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (34162 - 36850, n=2)
35506 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
33251 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
30119 Points -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G56 (Chrome 138.0.7204.63)
1222.9 ms * -12%
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=150, last 2 years)
1213 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (1096 - 1172, n=2)
1134 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
1131.86 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G (Chrome 141)
1095.8 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
1055 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to the UFS 2.2 standard, you should be able to enjoy fast data transfers and short loading times. However, although the storage appears impressive on paper, the Redmi 15 5G's storage controller doesn't play ball. It significantly slows down the storage, which means you'll still often have to wait.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5GSamsung Galaxy A17 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMotorola Moto G56Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-36%
60%
59%
69%
50%
188%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
525.5
528.2
1%
950.62
81%
1013.35
93%
987.81
88%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
496.5
170.7
-66%
792.56
60%
859.11
73%
943.43
90%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
139.4
134.7
-3%
257.91
85%
230.68
65%
243.98
75%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
218.7
56.4
-74%
245.16
12%
226.19
3%
265.26
21%

Games – For casual gaming

The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G isn't exactly a true gaming phone. Playing the demanding Genshin Impact, we only achieved around 20fps even at the lowest settings. The game stuttered noticeably and was barely playable, especially during battles. PUBG Mobile still managed around 30fps at all settings.

We tested the frame rates with the GameBench software.

Games can be controlled via the touchscreen, and, if necessary, the position sensor works smoothly and reliably.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø19.9 (18-21)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø19.6 (16-21)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.6 (24-31)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.7 (25-31)

Emissions – Good heat dissipation

Temperature

In our test, the case barely heated up even after extended load, and we measured a maximum of 40.3°C. While this can be a bit higher on hot days, the Redmi 15 5G is generally well-cooled.

The 3DMark stress tests also showed no significant drops in results. This means we can assume that the SoC maintains a constant maximum performance.

Max. Load
 40.3 °C
105 F
34.2 °C
94 F
31.2 °C
88 F
 
 40 °C
104 F
37.5 °C
100 F
32.3 °C
90 F
 
 39 °C
102 F
32.8 °C
91 F
31.2 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 40.3 °C = 105 F
Average: 35.4 °C = 96 F
30 °C
86 F
32.6 °C
91 F
35.8 °C
96 F
30.2 °C
86 F
34.6 °C
94 F
38.5 °C
101 F
30.2 °C
86 F
32.6 °C
91 F
37.5 °C
100 F
Maximum: 38.5 °C = 101 F
Average: 33.6 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.8 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99 % 0%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 %
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 % -3%
Motorola Moto G56
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7060, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
% -100%
0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø2.51 (2.51-2.52)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.52 (9.49-9.55)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap rear
Heatmap rear

Speakers

Unfortunately, the speaker only produces mono sound that's a bit high-pitched. Although you can listen to pop music, the phone doesn't sound particularly powerful.

Even with movie sound, you quickly miss the punch, but speech is at least quite understandable.

If you wish to connect external speakers or headphones, you can do so via the USB port or wirelessly via Bluetooth. In our tests, both worked without issues.

For wireless audio transmission, the phone supports the most important audio codecs, including some HD audio-capable options such as LDAC and aptX HD.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.1432533.535.73132.531.44032375032.836.96325.727.58016.719.21001724.612518.131.716017.740.320018.346.125017.750.131517.753.74001652.350017.356.663024.864.880023.670.3100018.875.9125017.479.7160018.280200016.577.3250014.278.6315015.878400018.371.9500020.869.1630019.473.2800019.2771000020.276.2125002275.7160001959.5SPL31.488.4N1.570.1median 18.2median 70.3Delta1.21237.839.928.137.924.439.620.541.529.544.318.940.617.743.115.844.413.445.113.946.711.248.310.452.411.757.110.158.78.864.68.967.79.272.59.878.910.382.510.881.211.883.711.383.31282.31375.712.675.612.879.212.975.513.374.213.568.713.663.823.891.90.585.8median 11.8median 74.21.511.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 15 5GXiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtimes – Redmi 15 5G is a runtime king

Power consumption

The Redmi 15 5G's power consumption is normal to moderate for a smartphone in this performance class.

The smartphone can be charged at a maximum of 33 watts, and it can sometimes take more than three hours to fully recharge, due to the large battery.

The generous power storage also has the advantage of allowing the Redmi 15 5G to be used as a power bank because wired reverse charging is possible at up to 18 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G56
5200 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-4%
2%
5%
5%
-26%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.1
1
9%
1.15
-5%
1
9%
1.14
-4%
1.05 ?(1 - 1.1, n=2)
5%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.4
1.3
7%
1.55
-11%
1.3
7%
1.3
7%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.9
1.6
16%
1.57
17%
1.9
-0%
1.34
29%
1.65 ?(1.4 - 1.9, n=2)
13%
Load Average * (Watt)
3.8
4.9
-29%
3.87
-2%
3.5
8%
2.96
22%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
6.4
8.1
-27%
7.66
-20%
7.2
-13%
8.18
-28%
6.6 ?(6.4 - 6.8, n=2)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.35 (1.266-6.07)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.639 (1.161-2.26)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.41.71.92.22.42.62.93.13.43.63.84.14.34.6Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.8 (3.59-4.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.639 (1.161-2.26)

Battery life

Many smartphones have recently been released in Germany, housing smaller batteries, but not the Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G. It boasts a very large 7,000 mAh battery, allowing it to offer long battery life.

Specifically, the phone achieved a runtime of over 21 hours in our Wi-Fi test, which helped it last two or three days without charging. You can watch movies from the internal storage for almost 30 hours, meaning you could watch all the Harry Potter films and the Lord of the Rings Extended Versions back to back without the battery running out.

Even under heavy load, the battery life is excellent: For example, you can play games for over 7 hours before the lights go out.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 51min
WiFi Websurfing
21h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
29h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 15min
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G56
5200 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Battery runtime
-33%
-32%
-12%
-21%
Reader / Idle (h)
40.9
33.7
-18%
30
-27%
34.7
-15%
H.264 (h)
29.7
17.9
-40%
17
-43%
22.9
-23%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
21.1
13.2
-37%
12.9
-39%
18.5
-12%
17.4
-18%
Load (h)
7.3
4.5
-38%
6
-18%
5.2
-29%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G's clear priority is to offer the best possible battery life at the lowest possible price.

This comes at the cost of compromises in other areas. But if battery life is your top priority, you get a decent smartphone too.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G review.
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G review.

Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G - 10/21/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
8 / 55 → 14%
Application Performance
59 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
8%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
54%
Average
60%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.4%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
80%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.1%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
72.6%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
2. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
List Price: 250€
224 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"
2340x1080
374 PPI
IPS
2.
73.3%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Exynos 1330 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $230.00
List Price: 209€
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
AMOLED
3.
75.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.59
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
2. $3.59
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Redmi No...
3. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
4.
74.9%
Motorola Moto G56
Motorola Moto G56
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $5.69
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $5.97
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
List Price: 250 Euro
200 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"
2400x1080
391 PPI
IPS
5.
76.1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco M7 P...
2. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $11.99
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
List Price: 240€
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G smartphone review – A hot candidate for the runtime throne
Florian Schmitt, 2025-10-23 (Update: 2025-10-23)