Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 508 vs Qualcomm Adreno 505
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 508 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 508 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs".
Qualcomm Adreno 505 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506 , the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 Qualcomm Adreno 508 Qualcomm Adreno 505 Adreno 500 Series Shared Memory yes yes yes API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 5 nm 14 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 07.05.2021 08.05.2017 15.12.2015 Architecture Adreno 500 Adreno 500 Core Speed 650 MHz 450 MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 16508 avg: 18279 median: 18469 (2%) max: 18635 Points
min: 7924 avg: 10477 median: 10069 (1%) max: 13656 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
5627 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10835 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 1299 avg: 1379 median: 1391 (6%) max: 1415 Points
min: 482 avg: 632 median: 603.5 (3%) max: 835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 1204 avg: 1302 median: 1318 (3%) max: 1332 Points
min: 423 avg: 552 median: 529.5 (1%) max: 735 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 872 avg: 904 median: 907 (5%) max: 919 Points
min: 0 avg: 371 median: 365 (2%) max: 505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 767 avg: 797 median: 801 (2%) max: 809 Points
min: 0 avg: 309.7 median: 305 (1%) max: 432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 1.7 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (0%) max: 1.9 fps
min: 0.88 avg: 1.1 median: 1.2 (0%) max: 1.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 4.9 avg: 5.3 median: 5.3 (0%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 2.6 avg: 3.3 median: 3.6 (0%) max: 3.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 5.3 avg: 5.5 median: 5.5 (1%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 2.1 avg: 2.7 median: 2.6 (0%) max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 5.2 avg: 9.4 median: 9.7 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 2.2 avg: 4.6 median: 4.6 (0%) max: 6.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 13 avg: 13.9 median: 14 (1%) max: 14 fps
min: 4.6 avg: 8 median: 7.1 (0%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508 min: 29 avg: 29.7 median: 30 (0%) max: 30 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 min: 11 avg: 17.7 median: 17 (0%) max: 25 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
33.5 fps (55%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
8015 Points (18%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 16486 avg: 16610 median: 16609.5 (37%) max: 16733 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
5.2 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2589 avg: 3292 median: 3292 (3%) max: 3995 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1032 avg: 1168 median: 1167.5 (2%) max: 1303 Points
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 16% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 8% n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 508:
30 31 31 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
18 fps, max:
32 fps
31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
31 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 505:
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 7A 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 8A 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
1 fps, max:
31 fps
30 31 [X] BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
23 fps, max:
32 fps
31 31 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
23 fps, max:
32 fps
32 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
Adreno 505:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
17 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 7A 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 8A 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
5 fps, max:
31 fps
30 32 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 508:
29 30 55 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.12.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 38 fps
Adreno 505:
42 47 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
31 fps, max:
55 fps
47 58 ~ 49 fps
Adreno 505:
41 46 47 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
58 ~ 48 fps
Adreno 505:
30 30 30 30 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 30 [X] Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
50 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
52 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
53 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
54 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
~ 39 fps
Adreno 505:
29 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 30 30 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 505:
19 19 24 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
25 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
27 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
27 30 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 ~ 26 fps
50%
Adreno 508:
29 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
47%
Adreno 508:
25 28 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
15 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 28 fps
Adreno 508:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 505:
60 [X] Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 46% Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 41% Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 505 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 25 24 Arena of Valor 31 30 Shadow Fight 3 49 48 Dead Trigger 2 39 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 26 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 21 Temple Run 2 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 3 1 2 2 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 09:17:39
#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8112 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.111s ... 0.112s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.112s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.112s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.037s ... 0.149s
#9 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.006s ... 0.155s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8112 +0.002s ... 0.156s
#11 got single benchmarks 8112 +0.021s ... 0.178s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7444 +0.002s ... 0.18s
#13 got single benchmarks 7444 +0.084s ... 0.263s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.263s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.161s ... 0.425s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.425s
#17 Got 110 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.453s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.453s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.457s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.02s ... 0.477s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.477s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.479s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)