Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 640 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750

Qualcomm Adreno 640

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 640

The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.

The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 750
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement12.02.2018 30.11.2021 25.10.2023
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 640GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8608 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus8 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8558 x 2840 MHz, 5 W? MHz585 MHz
min. - max.? - 250 MHz585 - 675 MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 201     avg: 248.3     median: 256 (1%)     max: 309 Points
min: 948     avg: 1548     median: 1633 (4%)     max: 1826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3079     avg: 3323     median: 3436 (2%)     max: 3455 Points
min: 2311     avg: 2891     median: 3056 (2%)     max: 3502 Points
min: 15108     avg: 18720     median: 19025.5 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 864     avg: 936     median: 970 (1%)     max: 974 Points
min: 599     avg: 748     median: 790.5 (1%)     max: 901 Points
min: 3991     avg: 4766     median: 4765 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 4769     avg: 7999     median: 8264 (4%)     max: 8791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
948 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 97354     avg: 108080     median: 106829 (11%)     max: 118129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 5268     avg: 7441     median: 7659 (33%)     max: 8661 Points
5762 Points (25%)
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6358     avg: 9988     median: 10199 (22%)     max: 12070 Points
6231 Points (14%)
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3969     avg: 6014     median: 6182 (26%)     max: 6981 Points
min: 4356     avg: 5091     median: 5090 (21%)     max: 5765 Points
min: 9984     avg: 16072     median: 17279 (73%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5184     avg: 7016     median: 7072.5 (18%)     max: 8218 Points
min: 4323     avg: 5373     median: 5490.5 (14%)     max: 6076 Points
min: 22388     avg: 29111     median: 29081 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 5251     avg: 7260     median: 7443 (66%)     max: 8338 Points
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 6122     avg: 9542     median: 9754.5 (59%)     max: 11259 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4556     avg: 5605     median: 5670 (28%)     max: 6319 Points
min: 4087     avg: 4575     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 4773 Points
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5429     avg: 6345     median: 6322.5 (21%)     max: 7150 Points
min: 3967     avg: 4639     median: 4845 (16%)     max: 4899 Points
29890 Points (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
6.6 fps (2%)
min: 4.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.8 (2%)     max: 7.1 fps
min: 27     avg: 36     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.5     avg: 17.5     median: 17 (3%)     max: 39 fps
min: 10     avg: 12.6     median: 13 (2%)     max: 16 fps
min: 43     avg: 75.5     median: 77 (14%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 40.5     median: 42 (3%)     max: 47 fps
min: 20     avg: 33.6     median: 35 (3%)     max: 44 fps
min: 92     avg: 187     median: 188.5 (14%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 40.2     median: 42 (4%)     max: 48 fps
min: 23     avg: 27.1     median: 29 (3%)     max: 30 fps
min: 64     avg: 141.3     median: 147 (14%)     max: 167 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 64.4     median: 69 (1%)     max: 79 fps
min: 32     avg: 49     median: 53 (1%)     max: 56 fps
min: 90     avg: 239.1     median: 247.5 (5%)     max: 292 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 50     avg: 94.7     median: 99.5 (4%)     max: 112 fps
min: 62     avg: 68.6     median: 70 (3%)     max: 76 fps
min: 143     avg: 315.5     median: 326 (14%)     max: 388 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 640
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85     avg: 158.9     median: 166 (1%)     max: 185 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
min: 105     avg: 117.5     median: 121 (1%)     max: 126 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
min: 189     avg: 479.2     median: 498 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 204205     avg: 204715     median: 204715 (20%)     max: 205225 Points
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (7%)     max: 141881 Points
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 47395     avg: 108064     median: 120005 (8%)     max: 148941 Points
min: 415471     avg: 762370     median: 774427 (53%)     max: 927463 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
64.9 fps (2%)
min: 38.5     avg: 41.3     median: 40.5 (1%)     max: 45.8 fps
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
2968 Points (1%)
min: 1323     avg: 1609     median: 1339 (0%)     max: 2243 Points
min: 10798     avg: 14095     median: 14184 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
2419 Points (1%)
min: 1637     avg: 2365     median: 1689 (0%)     max: 3509 Points
min: 13579     avg: 15806     median: 16169 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10504     avg: 18251     median: 14922.5 (5%)     max: 40654 Points
min: 20418     avg: 26631     median: 27556.5 (9%)     max: 30991 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4244     avg: 11804     median: 5422.5 (7%)     max: 44840 Points
min: 24021     avg: 26637     median: 26957 (36%)     max: 28612 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (3%)
min: 3.3     avg: 5.1     median: 4.9 (2%)     max: 9.68 Watt
min: 3.24     avg: 9.2     median: 9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 69% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 397% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 710:
29.9 29.9 30 30 59.2 ~ 36 fps
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 710:
29.6 29.8 29.9 30 44.6 ~ 33 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 710:
28.8 43 43.8 47 47.1 49 59 ~ 45 fps
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
Adreno 710:
24 29.3 30 31 39 44 46.6 ~ 35 fps
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 640:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 710:
39 58.6 58.8 59.3 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 640:
30 30 30 40 40 40 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
116%
Adreno 710:
30 39.7 40 58.8 59 59.6 60 ~ 50 fps
135%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
Adreno 710:
39 39.7 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 640:
30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 62 ~ 57 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps
87%
Adreno 710:
60 60 115 ~ 78 fps
89%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 640:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 ~ 36 fps
high
100%
Adreno 640:
28 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 33 fps
180%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 640:
120  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 135%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 157%

Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal363360
Genshin Impact45355359.857
PUBG Mobile4357504088605840
Dead Trigger 2907880
Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3





1
1

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

1
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 17. 18:44:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765993490s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.022s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0.019s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.025s ... 0.066s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0s ... 0.066s

#12 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.016s ... 0.083s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.083s

#14 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.03s ... 0.113s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.127s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.127s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.128s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.149s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.149s

#21 Got 177 rows for game benchmarks. +0.025s ... 0.174s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.174s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.175s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.179s

#25 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.179s

#26 return log +0.001s ... 0.18s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)