Qualcomm Adreno 509 vs Qualcomm Adreno 640 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Qualcomm Adreno 509 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 509 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the lower end Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
Qualcomm Adreno 640 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.
The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 509 Qualcomm Adreno 640 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 10 nm 6 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 08.05.2017 12.02.2018 07.05.2021
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 20610 avg: 20839 median: 20836 (2%) max: 21067 Points
min: 97354 avg: 108080 median: 106829 (12%) max: 118129 Points
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1525 avg: 1541 median: 1540 (7%) max: 1568 Points
min: 5268 avg: 7441 median: 7659 (33%) max: 8661 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1358 avg: 1395 median: 1400 (3%) max: 1406 Points
min: 6358 avg: 9988 median: 10199 (22%) max: 12070 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 765 avg: 980 median: 1008 (5%) max: 1016 Points
min: 3969 avg: 6014 median: 6182 (31%) max: 6981 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 645 avg: 841 median: 865 (3%) max: 872 Points
min: 5184 avg: 7016 median: 7072.5 (21%) max: 8218 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3079 avg: 3323 median: 3436 (2%) max: 3455 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 864 avg: 936 median: 970 (1%) max: 974 Points
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
6.6 fps (3%)
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.2 (0%) max: 3.5 fps
min: 8.5 avg: 17.5 median: 17 (3%) max: 39 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.4 avg: 5.9 median: 6 (0%) max: 6.1 fps
min: 16 avg: 40.5 median: 42 (3%) max: 47 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
6.3 fps (1%)
min: 22 avg: 40.2 median: 42 (5%) max: 48 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.3 avg: 9.7 median: 10 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 35 avg: 64.4 median: 69 (1%) max: 79 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
16 fps (1%)
min: 50 avg: 94.7 median: 99.5 (6%) max: 112 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 509 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 35 avg: 35.6 median: 36 (0%) max: 36 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 640
min: 85 avg: 158.9 median: 166 (1%) max: 185 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 204205 avg: 204715 median: 204715 (26%) max: 205225 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
64.9 fps (0%)
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2968 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2419 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 5536 avg: 5562 median: 5561.5 (6%) max: 5587 Points
min: 10504 avg: 18251 median: 14922.5 (15%) max: 40654 Points
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1582 avg: 1740 median: 1740 (3%) max: 1898 Points
min: 4244 avg: 11804 median: 5422.5 (9%) max: 44840 Points
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (3%)
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 509 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 589% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 663% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 640:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi Pad 5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
30 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
25 25 ~ 25 fps
160%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
162%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
158%
Adreno 640:
30 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
53 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
60 fps, max:
63 fps
62 [X] Google Pixel 4 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
35 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 57 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
57 59 ~ 58 fps
103%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
103%
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
52 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1.8GHz
Adreno 509
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 45 fps
200%
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.6.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1.8GHz
Adreno 509
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
124%
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
26 fps, max:
30 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
44 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 36 fps
103%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
114%
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
24 fps, max:
30 fps
29 30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 33 fps
103%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 640:
120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.62.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.112.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 509 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 139% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 130%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 140% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 159%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 509 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 27 25 30 Arena of Valor 37 36 Shadow Fight 3 58 58 Dead Trigger 2 45 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 1 1 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 18. 09:09:20
#0 checking url part for id 8782 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.146s ... 0.147s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.147s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.147s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8782 +0.046s ... 0.193s
#9 got single benchmarks 8782 +0.036s ... 0.228s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0.002s ... 0.231s
#11 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.079s ... 0.31s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.312s
#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.058s ... 0.369s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.369s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.554s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.554s
#17 Got 147 rows for game benchmarks. +0.045s ... 0.599s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.599s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.605s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.031s ... 0.636s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.636s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.638s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
