Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 504 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP3

Qualcomm Adreno 504

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 504 is a mobile graphics card for lower mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

In the Snapdragon 429, the Adreno 504 is manufactured in the modern 12nm process and should be very power efficient.

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP3

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and uses 3 clusters (hence the MC3/MP3 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP3 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U / Realme 7 5G) is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 504ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Mali-G Series
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 500Bifrost
Core Speed450 MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement30.06.2018 03.07.2020
CodenameValhall
Pipelines3 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 504GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4294 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+5 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 41004 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
min. - max.320 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 800U8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 320 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6895     avg: 6896     median: 6896 (1%)     max: 6897 Points
min: 29682     avg: 32144     median: 32143.5 (4%)     max: 34605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 428     avg: 445     median: 445 (2%)     max: 462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 336     avg: 364.5     median: 364.5 (1%)     max: 393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
257 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
210 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1207     avg: 1337     median: 1226 (1%)     max: 1586 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 331     avg: 393.6     median: 366 (0%)     max: 461 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.7     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 4.7     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 504
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
11 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 84032     avg: 91910     median: 90626 (11%)     max: 101071 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 28.5     avg: 35.2     median: 33.7 (0%)     max: 44.63 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
3898 Points (4%)
min: 9293     avg: 21578     median: 25659 (26%)     max: 29783 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
860 Points (2%)
min: 3448     avg: 16034     median: 22192 (39%)     max: 22461 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.42     avg: 3.5     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 4.98 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 1024% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 504:
23  fps
174%
Mali-G57 MP3:
39 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP3:
40  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 504:
32  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 504:
31  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
61  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
429%
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
429%
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 344%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 174%

ARM Mali-G57 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift6045
Armajet50
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 261
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3


1


3
2

2







Qualcomm Adreno 504lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile23
Arena of Valor3231
Asphalt 9: Legends77
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1




1



1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 23:23:43

#0 checking url part for id 9890 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10571 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:41:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.08s ... 0.081s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.081s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.081s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9890 +0.024s ... 0.104s

#8 got single benchmarks 9890 +0.008s ... 0.112s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10571 +0.002s ... 0.114s

#10 got single benchmarks 10571 +0.027s ... 0.141s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.141s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.224s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.224s

#14 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.235s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.235s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.238s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.014s ... 0.252s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.252s

#19 return log +0.061s ... 0.312s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)