Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-2410M vs Intel Core i5-460M

Intel Core i5-2410M

► remove from comparison Intel 2410M

The Intel Core i5-2410M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q1 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.3 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.6 GHz (2 cores active) and 2.9 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2410M does not support AES, VT-d, and Trusted Execution functions.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2410M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2410M it is clocked from  650-1200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2410M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2410M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core i5-460M

► remove from comparison Intel 460M

The Intel Core i5-460M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 2.8 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 460M does not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.8 versus 3.06 GHz).

A feature of the new Core i5-460M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-460M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-460M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

ModelIntel Core i5-2410MIntel Core i5-460M
CodenameSandy BridgeArrandale
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2450M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2410M « 2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2467M compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M compare2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M compare2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M compare2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M compare2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M « 2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M compare2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M compare2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M compare2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM compare1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM compare1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM compare1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM compare1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM compare1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2300 - 2900 MHz2530 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size149 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketrPGA988B / BGA1023BGA1288, PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics 3000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 16GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualizationintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-x
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB2400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.19     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.61 Points
min: 1.7     avg: 2.2     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.48 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3066     avg: 3642     median: 3663 (22%)     max: 3733 Points
min: 2971     avg: 3106     median: 3080 (19%)     max: 3491 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6005     avg: 7880     median: 7962.5 (6%)     max: 8116 Points
min: 6634     avg: 7073     median: 7085 (5%)     max: 7898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7559     avg: 9451     median: 9618 (6%)     max: 9840 Points
min: 8060     avg: 8437     median: 8468 (5%)     max: 9160 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3093     avg: 4482     median: 4545 (6%)     max: 4670 Points
min: 3569     avg: 3807     median: 3818.5 (5%)     max: 4034 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 584     avg: 627     median: 591.5 (7%)     max: 838 s
103%
460M +
min: 515     avg: 596     median: 575 (7%)     max: 837 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 18.3     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (4%)     max: 26.3 s
103%
460M +
min: 16.7     avg: 19.4     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 27 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2410M +
2382 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2410M +
14.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2410M +
76.3 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2410M +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2410M +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2410M +
1.3 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2702     avg: 3198     median: 3219 (7%)     max: 3271 Points
min: 2770     avg: 2938     median: 2945 (6%)     max: 3142 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (3%)     max: 25 s
min: 14.09     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 30     avg: 32.4     median: 32 (1%)     max: 47 s
min: 33.03     avg: 37.3     median: 37 (2%)     max: 42.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 717     avg: 760     median: 743.5 (3%)     max: 1298 s
min: 782     avg: 918     median: 880 (4%)     max: 1521 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
53120 MIPS (25%)
38480 MIPS (18%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
32000 MFLOPS (25%)
28160 MFLOPS (22%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 7191     avg: 7287     median: 7287 (15%)     max: 7383 Points
min: 5942     avg: 6910     median: 6880 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.4     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
100%
460M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5000     avg: 8505     median: 8680 (7%)     max: 8974 Points
min: 6382     avg: 7659     median: 7826 (6%)     max: 7985 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1501     avg: 3173     median: 3211 (8%)     max: 3657 Points
min: 2402     avg: 2583     median: 2587 (6%)     max: 2756 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2410M → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-460M → 89% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 20:29:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1572 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1214 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751912998s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1572 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 1572 +0.072s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1214 +0.001s ... 0.078s

#10 got single benchmarks 1214 +0.034s ... 0.113s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.137s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)