Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-9880H vs Apple M1 Max

Intel Core i9-9880H

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.3 - 4.8 GHz (4.1 GHz with 8 cores) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked predecessor and even up to 100% compared to older Kaby-Lake quad-cores. Single thread performance however only improved slightly and the multi-core performance is heavily depending on the cooling.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Apple M1 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Max

The Apple M1 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 48 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (32 or 64 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU. This is the main difference to the M1 Pro and the CPU performance is quite similar.

The biggest difference to the M1 Pro is the bigger integrated GPU with 24 or 32 cores (up from 16).

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including two ProRes engines).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 57 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. 

ModelIntel Core i9-9880HApple M1 Max
CodenameCoffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeApple M1
Series: M1
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H « 2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Apple M1 Max « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2300 - 4800 MHz2060 - 3220 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB2.9 MB
L2 Cache2 MB28 MB
L3 Cache16 MB48 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1610 / 10
TDP45 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Transistors57000 Million
Chip AI11 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9880H
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8504     avg: 8670     median: 8747 (8%)     max: 8758 Points
min: 12385     avg: 12389     median: 12386 (12%)     max: 12396 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1140     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (49%)     max: 1208 Points
min: 1530     avg: 1533     median: 1533 (64%)     max: 1536 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 441     avg: 459     median: 465 (51%)     max: 474 Points
min: 390     avg: 393.3     median: 395 (43%)     max: 395 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2953     avg: 3271     median: 3235 (8%)     max: 3712 Points
min: 2735     avg: 2746     median: 2750 (7%)     max: 2753 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1317     avg: 1506     median: 1508 (10%)     max: 1721 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1691     median: 1691 (11%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 181     avg: 190.1     median: 190 (53%)     max: 198 Points
min: 197     avg: 202.3     median: 200 (55%)     max: 210 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6967 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42456 Points (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
118.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 39455     avg: 42728     median: 42138 (24%)     max: 46591 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4837     avg: 4943     median: 4924 (58%)     max: 5068 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
102.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
217 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.6     avg: 11.2     median: 11.1 (20%)     max: 11.86 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 293     avg: 336.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 384 Seconds
min: 187     avg: 188.7     median: 189 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.621     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.6904 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11788     avg: 12226     median: 12225.5 (26%)     max: 12663 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
476.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12593     avg: 15310     median: 15556 (38%)     max: 17046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
40635 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10705     avg: 12582     median: 12214 (31%)     max: 15206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14940     avg: 18040     median: 18580 (33%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6412     avg: 7482     median: 7221 (30%)     max: 9138 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
2442 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
12994 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
2319 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
12456 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1115     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (45%)     max: 1237 Points
min: 1764     avg: 1785     median: 1788.5 (68%)     max: 1798 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7109     avg: 7231     median: 7231 (13%)     max: 7353 Points
min: 12563     avg: 12697     median: 12702.5 (23%)     max: 12818 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1139     avg: 1188     median: 1186 (5%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6841     avg: 7034     median: 7100 (22%)     max: 7161 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5166     avg: 5409     median: 5457 (54%)     max: 5605 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28192     avg: 29022     median: 29077 (28%)     max: 29798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 715     avg: 919     median: 934 (1%)     max: 1044 ms
min: 404.3     avg: 459.2     median: 482.3 (1%)     max: 491.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38079     avg: 43238     median: 40443 (30%)     max: 50837 Points
min: 66938     avg: 68647     median: 68029 (50%)     max: 70973 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
184 Points (33%)
min: 350     avg: 358.7     median: 360 (65%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
940 Points (35%)
min: 1586     avg: 1607     median: 1615 (60%)     max: 1621 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
85.2 Watt (15%)
168%
1 M1 Max +
50.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 99.9     avg: 131.6     median: 131.6 (24%)     max: 163.2 Watt
248%
1 M1 Max +
53 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
11.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.4 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 10.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (9%)     max: 14.4 Points per Watt
256%
1 M1 Max +
31.9 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9880H → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Max → 146% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 15. 17:06:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11348 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13843 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760540804s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:49:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11348 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 11348 +0.012s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13843 +0s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 13843 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)