Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900KAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
CodenameAlder LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3200 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB512 KB
L2 Cache14 MB8 MB
L3 Cache30 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 248 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP125 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700FP7/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
43.7 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (82%)     max: 2011 Points
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (72%)     max: 1794 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (84%)     max: 777 Points
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (75%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (80%)     max: 292 Points
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (76%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.5 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (72%)     max: 112893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (78%)     max: 6580 MIPS
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (5%)     max: 206 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (9%)     max: 368.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (57%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (75%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (65%)     max: 28789 Points
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (47%)     max: 21708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (80%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2715 Points (63%)
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (60%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
17450 Points (68%)
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (40%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (67%)     max: 2042 Points
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (66%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (63%)     max: 64238 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96769 Points (64%)
77466 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (66%)     max: 255 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 330 Points
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (53%)     max: 315 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2308 Points (86%)
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (58%)     max: 1635 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (37%)
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 74% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 07. 03:41:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767753693s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 06 Jan 2026 15:10:37 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.009s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.071s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)