Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900 vs Intel Core i7-9850H

Intel Core i9-12900

► remove from comparison  i9-12900

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.1 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.8 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 202 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9850H

The Intel Core i7-9850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8850H, the 9850H offers only improved clock rates.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. Compared to the i7-8850H, the performance improved only slightly.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900Intel Core i7-9850H
CodenameAlder LakeCoffee Lake-H
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 « 2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5100 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB384 KB
L2 Cache14 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 246 / 12
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size215 mm2
SocketLGA 1700FCBGA1440
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$489 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900
39.8 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9850H
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18628 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
703 Points (77%)
min: 425     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (48%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7179 Points (18%)
min: 1800     avg: 2114     median: 2114 (5%)     max: 2428 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3299 Points (21%)
min: 1114     avg: 1205     median: 1230 (8%)     max: 1272 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
262 Points (73%)
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (53%)     max: 196.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
39 Points (50%)
12.5 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (75%)
2.1 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8949 Points (54%)
7169 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68729 Points (50%)
31938 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
107565 Points (69%)
42090 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14610 Points (18%)
9224 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
211.8 s (3%)
278 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
8.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10739 Points (17%)
5621 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
50152 MIPS (29%)
min: 25786     avg: 29714     median: 31087 (18%)     max: 32268 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5979 MIPS (70%)
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (60%)     max: 5092 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147.5 fps (4%)
68.3 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
310 fps (8%)
201.3 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.4 fps (25%)
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (16%)     max: 9.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
0.8 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.4 GB/s (59%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.2 GB/s (45%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
262.7 Seconds (2%)
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (3%)     max: 552 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17464 Points (37%)
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (21%)     max: 10975 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
78877 Points (61%)
min: 26292     avg: 34763     median: 37665 (29%)     max: 40333 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24314 Points (60%)
min: 9987     avg: 11361     median: 11512 (28%)     max: 12585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74061 Points (60%)
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (46%)     max: 61872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73871 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19775 Points (50%)
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
35153 Points (63%)
min: 14059     avg: 15802     median: 15330 (27%)     max: 18016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15095 Points (64%)
min: 4588     avg: 5605     median: 5953 (25%)     max: 6275 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2500 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13100 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1656 Points (63%)
1150 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
8924 Points (16%)
5270 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1638 Points (7%)
min: 1135     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (5%)     max: 1203 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8845 Points (28%)
min: 5353     avg: 5620     median: 5619.5 (18%)     max: 5886 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6991 Points (70%)
min: 5320     avg: 5509     median: 5594 (56%)     max: 5614 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36310 Points (36%)
min: 18098     avg: 22010     median: 23715 (23%)     max: 24218 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5376 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20077 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
602 ms (1%)
min: 1010     avg: 1018     median: 1015 (1%)     max: 1028 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38630     avg: 39090     median: 39091 (29%)     max: 39548 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
269 Points (48%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1785 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
151 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
206 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.7 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 56% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 09:44:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14150 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11350 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759131897s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14150 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14150 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11350 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 11350 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.021s ... 0.082s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)