Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8086K vs Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i7-8086K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8086K

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in mid 2018. It is a limited edition for the 40 year X86 anniversary and at the time of announcement the fastest Coffee-Lake CPU. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8086K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier. Compared to the cheaper i7-8700K (-66 Dollars) only the single core Turbo clock speed is faster (5 GHz versus 4.7 GHz).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Compared to the cheaper Core i7-8700K, the 8086K offers only a higher single core Turbo Boost and therefore in daily usage and gaming not faster. As a high-end model, the i7-8086K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i7-8086KIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i5-9600K
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-8086K « 3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3700 - 5000 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB9 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 66 / 6
TDP95 Watt65 Watt95 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm, 10014++ nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$425 U.S.$182 U.S.$262 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8086K
35.2 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8686 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495     median: 495 (55%)     max: 502 Points
416 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2998     avg: 3111     median: 3111 (8%)     max: 3224 Points
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1340     avg: 1366     median: 1349 (9%)     max: 1408 Points
984 Points (6%)
1094 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 205     median: 206 (62%)     max: 207 Points
173 Points (52%)
193 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.67     avg: 15     median: 15 (20%)     max: 15.41 Points
11.3 Points (15%)
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.2     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.35 Points
2 Points (49%)
2.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6541     avg: 7216     median: 7216 (44%)     max: 7891 Points
6490 Points (39%)
7205 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 33064     avg: 35896     median: 35896 (26%)     max: 38728 Points
31523 Points (23%)
33950 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (28%)
39494 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
9318 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 119.7     avg: 119.8     median: 119.8 (1%)     max: 119.9 s
198.7 s (2%)
176.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.041     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 4.21 s
6.8 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6637     avg: 6752     median: 6751.5 (11%)     max: 6866 Points
5794 Points (9%)
5903 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 35473     avg: 36060     median: 36059.5 (21%)     max: 36646 MIPS
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5325     avg: 5417     median: 5416.5 (65%)     max: 5508 MIPS
4678 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 85.1     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (30%)     max: 85.8 fps
64 fps (22%)
68.8 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 227.5     avg: 230.6     median: 230.6 (53%)     max: 233.6 fps
234 fps (54%)
250 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.2     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 11.4 fps
9.1 fps (16%)
8 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.792     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.795 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.9 GB/s (15%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.8     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (20%)     max: 7.9 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (14%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 315     avg: 383.7     median: 316 (2%)     max: 520 Seconds
468.5 Seconds (3%)
444.4 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.567     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.5974 sec
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10397     avg: 11218     median: 11218 (24%)     max: 12039 Points
10974 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.74     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.261 s
9.3 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.06     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.59 s
20.8 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 429.9     avg: 467     median: 467 (2%)     max: 504 s
499.8 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
37593 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11434     avg: 12861     median: 11554 (31%)     max: 15596 Points
11185 Points (30%)
11938 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
78929 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
78531 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (61%)
80235 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
9031 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
13701 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6745 Points (28%)
5777 Points (24%)
6071 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1240 Points (52%)
1139 Points (48%)
1217 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5485 Points (10%)
5715 Points (10%)
5855 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1276     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1318 Points
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5618     avg: 5644     median: 5644 (18%)     max: 5670 Points
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5768     avg: 5821     median: 5792 (58%)     max: 5904 Points
5347 Points (53%)
5916 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22817     avg: 24618     median: 24527 (27%)     max: 26509 Points
21830 Points (24%)
23810 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 861     avg: 862     median: 862 (1%)     max: 863 ms
867 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 217     median: 217 (45%)     max: 218 Points
211 Points (44%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
145.9 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
134 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8086K → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 87% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 90% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 12:16:56

#0 checking url part for id 10106 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10106 +0.018s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 10106 +0.025s ... 0.074s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.017s ... 0.091s

#10 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.009s ... 0.1s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.003s ... 0.103s

#12 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.009s ... 0.112s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.36s ... 0.471s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.471s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)