Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8365U vs Intel Core i7-8665U

Intel Core i5-8365U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8365U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro capable CPUs of the WHL-U series. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i5-8250U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i5-8365U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4.1 GHz (versus 3.4 GHz of the i5-8250U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8265U, the i5-8365U offers a 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost. As the i5-8365U first appeared in a Thinkpad, the CPU most likely supports vPRO for additional hardware management features.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i5-8365U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Compared to the Core i5-8265U (see for benchmarks), the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost should result in some gains in single core benchmarks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i7-8665U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8665U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro enabled WHL-U processors. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8665U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,8 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 should support Thermal Velocity Boost (like the Core i7-8565U, the predecessor).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8665U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Due to the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost, the 8665U should outperform the i7-8565U (see for benchmarks).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i5-8365UIntel Core i7-8665U
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i7
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UWhiskey Lake-U
Series: Core i7 Whiskey Lake-U
Intel Core i5-8365U « 1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U compare1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8665U « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1600 - 4100 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8365U
28.9 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8665U
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2729 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
988 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 419     avg: 421.3     median: 421 (47%)     max: 424 Points
min: 379     avg: 427     median: 427 (47%)     max: 472 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1373     avg: 1404     median: 1408 (3%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 1050     avg: 1329     median: 1346 (3%)     max: 1530 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 558     avg: 584     median: 579 (4%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 166.5     median: 166 (50%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.7 Points (7%)
4.9 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (48%)
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6557 Points (40%)
min: 6716     avg: 6872     median: 6872 (42%)     max: 7028 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16518 Points (12%)
min: 16602     avg: 18427     median: 18426.5 (13%)     max: 20251 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.7 s (4%)
429.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
10 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3173 Points (5%)
3418 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 16711     avg: 17312     median: 17293 (10%)     max: 17932 MIPS
min: 14665     avg: 18146     median: 18298 (11%)     max: 20023 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3958     avg: 4261     median: 4346 (52%)     max: 4478 MIPS
min: 4338     avg: 4684     median: 4705.5 (56%)     max: 4988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
35.9 fps (13%)
32 fps (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
153 fps (35%)
139 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 4.7 fps
min: 3.82     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 5.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 791     avg: 824     median: 825 (6%)     max: 855 Seconds
min: 716     avg: 801     median: 754.5 (5%)     max: 978 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6330 Points (13%)
min: 6202     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (14%)     max: 6528 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
19 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
546 s (2%)
521 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6016     avg: 6522     median: 6395 (17%)     max: 7280 Points
min: 6266     avg: 7143     median: 6758 (18%)     max: 8676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 48328     avg: 49088     median: 49088 (40%)     max: 49848 Points
56356 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49912     avg: 50182     median: 50182 (41%)     max: 50452 Points
56510 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 56207     median: 56206.5 (47%)     max: 57042 Points
min: 54189     avg: 59812     median: 60829 (51%)     max: 63399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5405     avg: 5910     median: 6159 (16%)     max: 6166 Points
min: 5234     avg: 6225     median: 5948 (15%)     max: 7398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7744     avg: 8377     median: 8376.5 (15%)     max: 9009 Points
min: 6860     avg: 8356     median: 8188 (15%)     max: 10574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2464 Points (10%)
min: 2638     avg: 2872     median: 2723 (11%)     max: 3405 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1039 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2671 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4647     avg: 4823     median: 4822.5 (48%)     max: 4998 Points
min: 4686     avg: 5236     median: 5342.5 (53%)     max: 5574 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14833     avg: 15472     median: 15472 (17%)     max: 16111 Points
min: 11206     avg: 15544     median: 16347 (18%)     max: 18275 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4558 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13444 Points (33%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14277 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3887 Points (76%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1142     median: 1161 (1%)     max: 1165 ms
min: 1016     avg: 1072     median: 1067.5 (1%)     max: 1136 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
235 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31051     avg: 32738     median: 32878 (30%)     max: 34285 Points
min: 30142     avg: 33976     median: 34548 (31%)     max: 36667 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.9 Watt (7%)
27.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.5 Points per Watt (11%)
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8365U → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8665U → 99% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 15:07:29

#0 checking url part for id 11330 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11328 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11330 +0.021s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 11330 +0.02s ... 0.059s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11328 +0.016s ... 0.075s

#9 got single benchmarks 11328 +0.022s ... 0.097s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.313s ... 0.41s

#12 return log +0.06s ... 0.47s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)