Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-13400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a top modern and fast desktop processor and belongs to the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz. It reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-13400 therefore offers 6 P-cores and 4 E-cores, which can process a total of up to 16 threads in parallel. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process (called "Intel 7"). The Intel Core i5-13400 does not have a freely selectable multiplier. The LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series serves as the basis. The Intel Core i5-13400 can be based on either a Raptor Lake or Alder Lake chip. Initially, however, Alder Lake chips will be supplied.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-12400, the IPC of the new Core i5-13400 has been increased slightly. Nevertheless, there are now also 4 e-cores, which support the processor in terms of multi-thread performance. This puts the Intel Core i5-13400 at the level of an Intel Core i5-12600K, which also offers a total of 16 threads.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit, but it is only suited for office use or very old and low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13400 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 148 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i7-9700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700

The Intel Core i7-9700 is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3 - 4.7 GHz. Compared to the similar named Core i7-9700K, the 9700 has no open multiplicator for easy overclocking, offers lower clock speeds and offers a reduced TDP.

Compared to the old Core i7-8700, the 9700 offers two more real cores but no Hyperthreading. Therefore, the performance gain is not that big - depending on the app. The single core performance was slightly improved thanks to the higher Turbo clocks. As a high end desktop CPU, the i7-9700 is well suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 65 Watt (instead of the 95W of the faster models) and therefore the CPU wont need a high end desktop cooling system.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400Intel Core i7-9700Intel Core i5-9400F
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 « 3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz3000 - 4700 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 86 / 6
TDP65 Watt65 Watt65 Watt
10 nm14++ nm14 nm, 100
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151LGA 1151-2
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$221 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400
42.9 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9700
34 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15953 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1786 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
688 Points (76%)
474 Points (53%)
416 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6135 Points (15%)
2892 Points (7%)
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2358 Points (15%)
1254 Points (8%)
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
257 Points (77%)
199 Points (60%)
173 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.4 Points (36%)
14.4 Points (19%)
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
2.3 Points (56%)
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8721 Points (53%)
7473 Points (45%)
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51095 Points (37%)
37381 Points (27%)
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83214 Points (58%)
49666 Points (34%)
40065 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14142 Points (17%)
9840 Points (12%)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
452.3 s (5%)
155.8 s (2%)
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
4.8 s (1%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7979 Points (13%)
6945 Points (11%)
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
59510 MIPS (34%)
33539 MIPS (19%)
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5829 MIPS (70%)
5186 MIPS (62%)
4678 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
135.8 fps (47%)
77.6 fps (27%)
64 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
311 fps (72%)
247.5 fps (57%)
234 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.1 fps (34%)
10.5 fps (18%)
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (31%)
7.6 GB/s (20%)
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
388.7 Seconds (3%)
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.6 sec (13%)
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
8.3 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
18.4 s (1%)
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
427.2 s (2%)
460.7 s (2%)
499.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79573 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23120 Points (63%)
13939 Points (38%)
11185 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
83302 Points (68%)
79476 Points (65%)
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82671 Points (67%)
79073 Points (64%)
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
89999 Points (76%)
79079 Points (67%)
72413 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19608 Points (50%)
11688 Points (30%)
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27135 Points (48%)
16387 Points (29%)
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12948 Points (55%)
6867 Points (29%)
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1795 Points (76%)
1312 Points (55%)
1139 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12107 Points (22%)
7060 Points (13%)
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (7%)
1300 Points (6%)
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11801 Points (37%)
7060 Points (22%)
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7683 Points (77%)
5777 Points (58%)
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42509 Points (47%)
27040 Points (30%)
21830 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
790 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
306 Points (64%)
232 Points (48%)
211 Points (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1877 Points (72%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
229 Watt (39%)
124%
1 i7-9700 +
143.8 Watt (25%)
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
196.6 Watt (36%)
116%
1 i7-9700 +
141.9 Watt (26%)
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
82.8 Watt (92%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i7-9700 +
8.8 Points per Watt (7%)
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700 → 75% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 66% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 12:55:03

#0 checking url part for id 14996 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12254 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14996 +0.019s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 14996 +0.01s ... 0.061s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12254 +0.019s ... 0.081s

#10 got single benchmarks 12254 +0.008s ... 0.089s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.016s ... 0.105s

#12 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.008s ... 0.113s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.422s ... 0.535s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.535s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)