Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-9700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700

The Intel Core i7-9700 is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3 - 4.7 GHz. Compared to the similar named Core i7-9700K, the 9700 has no open multiplicator for easy overclocking, offers lower clock speeds and offers a reduced TDP.

Compared to the old Core i7-8700, the 9700 offers two more real cores but no Hyperthreading. Therefore, the performance gain is not that big - depending on the app. The single core performance was slightly improved thanks to the higher Turbo clocks. As a high end desktop CPU, the i7-9700 is well suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 65 Watt (instead of the 95W of the faster models) and therefore the CPU wont need a high end desktop cooling system.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

ModelIntel Core i7-9700Intel Core i5-9400F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 « 3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4700 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 86 / 6
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
14++ nm14 nm, 100
Die Size178 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$182 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9700
34 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
474 Points (53%)
416 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2892 Points (7%)
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1254 Points (8%)
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
199 Points (60%)
173 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (56%)
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7473 Points (45%)
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37381 Points (27%)
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
49666 Points (34%)
40065 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9840 Points (12%)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
155.8 s (2%)
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6945 Points (11%)
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
33539 MIPS (19%)
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5186 MIPS (62%)
4678 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.6 fps (27%)
64 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
247.5 fps (57%)
234 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.5 fps (18%)
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388.7 Seconds (3%)
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
460.7 s (2%)
499.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13939 Points (38%)
11185 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79476 Points (65%)
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79073 Points (64%)
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79079 Points (67%)
72413 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11688 Points (30%)
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16387 Points (29%)
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6867 Points (29%)
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1312 Points (55%)
1139 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7060 Points (13%)
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1300 Points (6%)
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7060 Points (22%)
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5777 Points (58%)
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
27040 Points (30%)
21830 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
790 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
232 Points (48%)
211 Points (44%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
143.8 Watt (25%)
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
141.9 Watt (26%)
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i7-9700 +
8.8 Points per Watt (7%)
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 86% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 10:26:45

#0 checking url part for id 12254 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12254 +0.02s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 12254 +0.009s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.018s ... 0.071s

#9 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.009s ... 0.079s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.281s ... 0.36s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.383s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)