Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1035G7 vs AMD A9-9420 vs AMD A6-9220e

Intel Core i5-1035G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1035G7

The Intel Core i5-1035G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.2 (base) - 3.7 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.6 GHz and all four 3.3 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock). The Core i5-1035G7 is the second fastest Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4-3733).

Performance

The average 1035G7 in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 3 4300U and the Core i5-10210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't bad at all as of late 2021. The Core i5-1035G4 and the Core i5-1035G1 are two other chips that nearly match the 1035G7 in multi-thread performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the Surface Laptop 3 13 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1035G7 that we know of. It can be at least 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Those values are a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The processor is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD A9-9420

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420

The AMD A9-9420 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A9-9420 is the fastest Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and takes over that place from the A9-9410 (-100 MHz CPU clock). It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 3 - 3.6 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at 800 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.6 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. The multi-core performance on the other hand is much lower compared to the Bristol Ridge models. Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. The level of performance should be similar to a Core-m3 and therefore also be sufficient for more demanding applications.

The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.

AMD A6-9220e

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220e

The AMD A6-9220e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. The 9220e is an entry-level Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.6 - 2.4 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the similar named A6-9220 the 9220e is significantly slower clocked (2.5 - 2.9 GHz) including the GPU (600 versus 655 MHz) and can be passively cooled thanks to the TDP of 6W.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220e is noticeably slower than the A6-9220. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark the 9220 reaches 38% higher scores, in the single thread test its more than twice as fast (219% versus the 9220 in the HP 255 G6). Compared to Intel CPUs, the A6-9220e is on par with the old Celeron N2820 in Cinebench (single and multi core). Therefore, the CPU is placed in the lowest segment (performance wise) and only suited for light tasks and light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220e with 6 Watts and therefore significantly below the 15 W of the A6-9220. This means the APU can be passively cooled and is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelIntel Core i5-1035G7AMD A9-9420AMD A6-9220e
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameIce Lake-UStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G71.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 « 1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 « 3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 - 3700 MHz3000 - 3600 MHz1600 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt10-25 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm28 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1526BGABGA
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G7
29.1 pt (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 380     avg: 415.3     median: 427 (47%)     max: 439 Points
73 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1043     avg: 1302     median: 1233 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
110 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 539     avg: 662     median: 712 (4%)     max: 736 Points
min: 124     avg: 132     median: 134 (1%)     max: 138 Points
86 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 153     avg: 165     median: 170 (51%)     max: 172 Points
min: 75     avg: 80.3     median: 81 (24%)     max: 85 Points
31 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (8%)     max: 7.94 Points
min: 1.56     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.77     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.05 Points
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (25%)     max: 1 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6044     avg: 6450     median: 6449.5 (39%)     max: 6855 Points
min: 2761     avg: 2868     median: 2875 (17%)     max: 2969 Points
1056 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 15373     avg: 19601     median: 19601 (14%)     max: 23829 Points
min: 4627     avg: 4830     median: 4841 (4%)     max: 5022 Points
1741 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
20535 Points (14%)
6757 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8073 Points (10%)
3410 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
265 s (3%)
min: 673     avg: 710     median: 710 (8%)     max: 747 s
1517 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
min: 20.78     avg: 21.3     median: 21.3 (4%)     max: 21.8 s
35.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4513 Points (7%)
519 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 13921     avg: 17144     median: 18342 (11%)     max: 19168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4091     avg: 4183     median: 4205 (50%)     max: 4252 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
38.1 fps (13%)
2.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
167.5 fps (39%)
14.7 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.632     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 4.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (1%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 771     avg: 880     median: 794 (6%)     max: 1075 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8736 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
min: 18     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (4%)     max: 18.6 s
66.4 s (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.1 s (1%)
min: 39.16     avg: 40.5     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 41.8 s
113.1 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
456.5 s (2%)
min: 824     avg: 866     median: 866 (4%)     max: 908 s
2732 s (12%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
24378 Points (21%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4649     avg: 6765     median: 6764.5 (18%)     max: 8880 Points
min: 1569     avg: 1659     median: 1632 (4%)     max: 1776 Points
529 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18908     avg: 34807     median: 34806.5 (28%)     max: 50705 Points
19241 Points (16%)
4502 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 18887     avg: 34525     median: 34524.5 (28%)     max: 50162 Points
18148 Points (15%)
4404 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 54327     avg: 54876     median: 54876 (46%)     max: 55425 Points
min: 18866     avg: 18895     median: 18894.5 (16%)     max: 18923 Points
5273 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5499     avg: 6720     median: 6720 (17%)     max: 7941 Points
min: 1375     avg: 1455     median: 1455 (4%)     max: 1535 Points
444 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7242     avg: 9252     median: 9251.5 (16%)     max: 11261 Points
min: 2153     avg: 2155     median: 2155 (4%)     max: 2157 Points
376 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3618 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1163 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2713 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1126     avg: 1135     median: 1135 (5%)     max: 1144 Points
260 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2707     avg: 3488     median: 3488 (11%)     max: 4269 Points
293 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4947     avg: 5289     median: 5439 (54%)     max: 5481 Points
1260 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12220     avg: 15692     median: 17322 (19%)     max: 17534 Points
1571 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1112 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1513 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1929 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2003 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1329 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3297 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2796 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3496 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3085 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3192 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 880     avg: 972     median: 971.5 (1%)     max: 1063 ms
2120 ms (2%)
4105 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A9-9420 +
148.1 ms (2%)
357.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31078     avg: 33114     median: 33114 (30%)     max: 35150 Points
min: 15762     avg: 17290     median: 17290 (16%)     max: 18818 Points
9070 Points (8%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (39%)
64 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
23.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.3     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (6%)     max: 41.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.9 (15%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G7 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420 → 53% n=20

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220e → 36% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 03. 11:25:22

#0 checking url part for id 11401 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9184 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11876 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11401 +0.016s ... 0.061s

#8 got single benchmarks 11401 +0.015s ... 0.076s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9184 +0.003s ... 0.079s

#10 got single benchmarks 9184 +0.017s ... 0.095s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11876 +0.003s ... 0.098s

#12 got single benchmarks 11876 +0.006s ... 0.104s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.399s ... 0.503s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.503s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)