Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Laptop Review: Handicapped Core i7-11370H limits an otherwise good device

All that is aluminum isn't fast. The Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro seeks to be a worthy mid-ranger with a premium all-aluminum chassis, a good 2.5K 16:10 display, and a decent spec sheet. While the Mi NoteBook Pro definitely gets the job done for the most part, a thorough investigation reveals that Xiaomi is not able to extract the maximum possible performance from the Core i7-11370H for the ₹73,999 (US$993) asking price.

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam 👁, Published 12/30/2021 🇳🇱 🇨🇳 ...

Since the launch of the Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition in 2020, Xiaomi has been trying to make a mark for itself in the mid-range laptop niche. A few months ago, Xiaomi introduced two new laptops in the Indian market — the Mi NoteBook Pro and the Mi NoteBook Ultra. We have with us the Mi NoteBook Pro for review.

The Mi NoteBook Pro is a 14-inch laptop that resembles the RedmiBook Pro 15 in more ways than one. Our test sample is powered by the Intel Tiger Lake-H35 Core i7-11370H, 16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, and a 512 GB NVMe SSD, which is the maximum configurable option in the Pro series. This configuration will set you back by ₹73,999 (US$993).

In this review, we take the Mi NoteBook Pro for a spin and see whether the laptop performs as well as it looks.

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi India

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro (Mi Notebook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 30.0.101.1191

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200 Dual-Channel, Timings: 22-22-22-52

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, Panda LM140GF1L02, Oxide TFT-LCD FFS, 178° Wide-viewing angle, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Storage

YMTC PC005 Active 512GB, 512 GB

, 438 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 1x 3.5 mm combo audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.3 x 315.6 x 220.4 ( = 0.68 x 12.43 x 8.68 in)

Battery

56 Wh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11 h

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2W Stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Mi Support, MIUI+, Xiaomi Cloud, Macro Key, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.4 kg ( = 49.38 oz / 3.09 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

853 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.7 %	12/2021	Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	17.3 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
86.9 %	10/2021	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	16.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
86.4 %	10/2021	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	15.9 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
83.2 %	06/2021	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	1.7 kg	16 mm	15.60"	3200x2000
86.5 %	02/2021	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
86.5 %	06/2020	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7	1.2 kg	16.55 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
76.9 %	09/2021	HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
81.3 %	10/2021	Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	1.4 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	2160x1440

Case: Premium all-aluminum chassis

Of late, we have been seeing a healthy trend of midrange laptops such as the Realme Book (Slim) and the Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro and Ultra series sporting all-metal constructions. According to Xiaomi, the Mi NoteBook Pro features a unibody design made of aerospace-grade Series 6 aluminum that is CNC-machined and anodized to give a premium look.

The Mi NoteBook Pro feels well-built as a result and there are no sharp edges or distracting design elements. The all-aluminum construction offers the added benefit of being lightweight and the laptop tips the scales at just 1.4 kg.

The hinges are sturdy enough and allow one-finger opening of the lid. The lid does not wobble and there's negligible twist. The keyboard deck is quite rigid too, but it can flex a little when pushed down hard. Overall, the Mi NoteBook Pro's construction leaves little room for complaint.

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 HP 14s-fq1357ng Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Realme Book (Slim) DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity: Covers the essentials

The Mi NoteBook Pro does not offer too many ports, but it does take care of the essentials. On the left, we find a USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C port, a HDMI 1.4-out, USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, and Thunderbolt 4. Towards the right, we find the lone USB 2.0 Type-A port and a 3.5 mm combo audio jack. All the Type-C interfaces on the device support USB power delivery, so there's no dedicated charging port available.

We did not face any hindrances in accessing the ports or while connecting various peripherals to these ports. That being said, there is no built-in microSD card reader or Kensington lock slot available.

Left: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C port, HDMI 1.4-out, USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, Thunderbolt 4

Right: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, USB 2.0 Type-A

Communication

The Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 offers good transfer rates overall

Our test unit came equipped with an Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 WLAN card with Bluetooth 5.1. We noticed good download speeds a distance of 1 m from our reference Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120 router.

The wireless performance should be sufficient for most use cases. However, the uploads were inconsistent and were somewhat on the lower side for this card even after multiple repeats of the test.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1420 (686^min - 1498^max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1192 (526^min - 1384^max) MBit/s ∼84% +48%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1126 (552^min - 1223^max) MBit/s ∼79% +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1084 (1013^min - 1134^max) MBit/s ∼76% +35%
Average of class Multimedia (277 - 1446, n=37, last 2 years)	994 MBit/s ∼70% +24%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	804 (316^min - 976^max) MBit/s ∼57%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Wireless-AC 9560	772 (676^min - 884^max) MBit/s ∼54% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	660 (642^min - 680^max) MBit/s ∼46% -18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	287 (152^min - 308^max) MBit/s ∼20% -64%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1571 (1417^min - 1659^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1343 (650^min - 1573^max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1336 (1246^min - 1419^max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1314 (1233^min - 1359^max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1311 (1144^min - 1450^max) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1150 (1108^min - 1215^max) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia (137 - 1684, n=37, last 2 years)	1099 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	904 (879^min - 923^max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	296 (271^min - 305^max) MBit/s ∼19% -81%

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1571 (1417-1659)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (1144-1450)

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (316-976)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1084 (1013-1134)

Webcam

The 720p camera can just about get the job done for the occasional video call or two provided there's good ambient light. Colors show high deviations even under good ambient lighting conditions. Images in low-light turn out noisy and the sharpness is not particularly good either as evidenced from our test chart image below.

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro: 12.23 ∆E min: 1.87 - max: 23.76 ∆E

Security

Xiaomi includes a fingerprint sensor in the power button of the Mi NoteBook Pro. The fingerprint sensor works with Windows Hello and is quite responsive in everyday use. A discrete TPM 2.0 module is present, which makes the device eligible for a Windows 11 upgrade, which was, in fact, already offered to the Mi NoteBook Pro during testing.

Accessories

There are no additional accessories in the box apart from the 65 W USB-C power adapter and the usual paperwork.

Maintenance

There are no dedicated service flaps available. Removing the eight Torx T5 screws at the bottom will enable dislodging the bottom panel.

The Wi-Fi card and the NVMe SSD are user-replaceable, but the memory modules are soldered onto the motherboard. There are no additional drive bays or M.2 slots for storage expansion.

The Mi NoteBook Pro seems to be using the same motherboard seen in the RedmiBook Pro 15. Since the Mi NoteBook Pro does not feature dedicated Nvidia GeForce MX450 graphics, the areas where the GPU and the GDDR6 VRAM chips are otherwise placed appear unused.

Warranty

Xiaomi offers a standard one-year warranty for the Mi NoteBook Pro. Buyers can optionally extend the warranty by one year for ₹2,699 (US$36) or two years for ₹3,699 (US$49) during checkout. Additionally, an Accident Damage Liquid Damage (ADLD) plan valid for one year can also be purchased for ₹4,099 (US$54).

Input Devices: Quiet keys and a stiff touchpad

Keyboard

Xiaomi offers a decent keyboard with standard-sized keys. The keyboard offers a quiet typing experience, but the 1.3 mm key travel feels a bit shallow and does not offer much tactile feedback. Also, touch typists may feel that the keyboard offers a slightly higher resistance than they are otherwise used to. There is a two-level backlight that enables good key legibility in the dark.

There are no special keys for toggling performance modes. However, there is a dedicated Macro key at the end of the top row that activates macros defined in the bundled Macro Key app.

Touchpad

The 12.5 cm x 8.3 cm touchpad offers a large area for comfortable navigation and supports Windows Precision drivers for smooth gestures. The left and right click buttons are flush with the touchpad and do not click very loud. However, the touchpad buttons were particularly stiff with our test sample. The stiffness does reduce over time, but you may be better off with an external mouse.

Display: Decent FFS panel with no PWM

Our Mi NoteBook Pro unit features a Panda LM140GF1L02 14-inch 16:10 panel with a 2560x1600 resolution, 300 nits brightness, and a 60 Hz refresh rate. Xiaomi claims this is an IPS panel, but a quick search online reveals that this is actually an oxide TFT-LCD with fringe-field switching (FFS). It does, however, offers the benefits of a typical IPS display.

Long exposure times reveal significant backlight bleeding at the corners. The brightness distribution is decent at 87%.

Significant backlight bleed seen at the corners under long exposure


322 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
341 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	338 cd/m²
337 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	333 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Panda LM140GF1L02

X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 337.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 364 cd/m²
Contrast: 1686:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3)

	Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Panda LM140GF1L02, Oxide TFT-LCD FFS, 14.00, 2560x1600	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 14.00, 2880x1800	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 16.10, 1920x1080	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 IPS, 15.60, 3200x2000	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	Realme Book (Slim) Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14.00, 2160x1440
Display		11%	2%	1%	11%	-43%	-41%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	66.2	76.9 16%	66.6 1%	66.7 1%	77.1 16%	37.2 -44%	38.11 -42%	66.6 1%
sRGB Coverage	95.8	99.8 4%	99.5 4%	96.3 1%	99.8 4%	55.9 -42%	57 -41%	97.8 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67	76.7 14%	68.5 2%	68.5 2%	76.7 14%	38.43 -43%	39.37 -41%	68.2 2%
Response Times		-3%	9%	-4%	-92%	-15%	-20%	6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37.33 ?(16.58, 20.75)	36.4 ?(18, 18.4) 2%	32 ?(15, 17) 14%	34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6) 7%	61.2 ?(30, 31.2) -64%	41 ?(19, 22) -10%	41 ?(19, 22) -10%	33.26 ?(14.92, 18.34) 11%
Response Time Black / White *	20.91 ?(10.7, 10.21)	22.4 ?(10, 12.4) -7%	20 ?(11, 9) 4%	24 ?(12.4, 11.6) -15%	46 ?(24, 22) -120%	25 ?(14, 11) -20%	27 ?(15, 12) -29%	20.62 ?(11.52, 9.1) 1%
PWM Frequency			2500 ?(10)					58500 ?(10)
Screen		18%	24%	-21%	9%	-51%	-3%	3%
Brightness middle	371	410 11%	304 -18%	312 -16%	412 11%	269 -27%	220 -41%	403.52 9%
Brightness	338	395 17%	284 -16%	298 -12%	392 16%	244 -28%	223 -34%	390 15%
Brightness Distribution	87	91 5%	88 1%	87 0%	81 -7%	83 -5%	85 -2%	91 5%
Black Level *	0.22	0.29 -32%	0.165 25%	0.18 18%	0.32 -45%	0.23 -5%	0.225 -2%	0.27 -23%
Contrast	1686	1414 -16%	1842 9%	1733 3%	1288 -24%	1170 -31%	978 -42%	1495 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.82	3.24 33%	1.44 70%	5.39 -12%	1.88 61%	4.94 -2%	4.16 14%	5.23 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.35	5.26 44%	3.62 61%	9.95 -6%	3.06 67%	20.37 -118%	7.43 21%	9.69 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.21	0.41 66%		3.15 -160%	1.96 -62%	5.03 -316%		0.62 49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.2	4.2 32%	2.6 58%	6.3 -2%	2.2 65%	1.71 72%	2.35 62%	6.5 -5%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.18 ^101%	2.41 ^91%	2.192 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	2.52 ^87%	2.62 ^84%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	8320 ^78%	6012 ^108%	6527 ^100%	7473 ^87%	6650 ^98%	6535 ^99%	6389 ^102%	7727 ^84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			68.5	69	68.7	35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.5	96	99.8	56
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 14%	12% / 17%	-8% / -14%	-24% / -5%	-36% / -44%	-21% / -14%	4% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi claims a 100% sRGB coverage with the Mi NoteBook Pro; we measured close to 96%, which is still decent. Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 coverage is about as expected in this price range.

With an average Colorchecker Delta E of 4.82, out-of-the-box color accuracy is nothing to write home about and the display appears cooler than we'd like. However, our calibration routine helps to significantly enhance color accuracy resulting in an average Delta E value of 1.21.

Readers can download the calibrated ICC profile from the link above.

The display quality is fine for general multimedia consumption and even for basic photo or video editing workflows. Anything more serious, may benefit from an external display with wider gamut coverage.

We measured a combined 20.91 ms black to white and 37.33 ms 50% grey to 80% grey response times. These are not particularly ideal, but the Mi NoteBook Pro is not targeted at a gaming audience so the higher response times shouldn't have much of an impact in everyday use.

Xiaomi said the that the panel uses DC dimming to control the display backlight. However, we did not measure any perceivable PWM or DC dimming frequencies across all brightness levels, which is good news for users with sensitive eyes.

Check out our article, "Why Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) is such a headache" for more information and also our PWM ranking table for an overview of measured PWM and response times for all reviewed devices.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.7 ms rise
20.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.21 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.58 ms rise
37.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.75 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected		≤ 100 % brightness setting

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19210 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The matte display enables decent legibility outdoors as long as sunlight directly doesn't fall on the screen. There is no perceivable loss of color or brightness even when viewed from extreme angles.

Performance: Core i7-11370H not fully flexed

Our test sample is powered by the 4C/8T Intel Core i7-11370H Tiger Lake-H35 processor. Buyers can configure the Mi NoteBook Pro with a Core i5-11300H as well. Both configurations lack any form of discrete graphics.

Processor

The Mi NoteBook Pro does not utilize the Core i7-11370H to its full potential

The Core i7-11370H has a PL1 of 28 W and a PL2 of 64 W when plugged in. The 28 W PL1 means that this processor can offer a base clock of 3 GHz and a maximum boost up to 4.8 GHz. The PL1 drops to 25 W when on battery.

We observe good sustained performance in the Cinebench R15 multi loop test. However, Xiaomi's implementation of the Core i7-11370H in the Mi NoteBook Pro is not the fastest we've seen. The Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro and the Acer Swift 3 featuring the same processor offer perceivably improved performance.

There are no special power or performance modes offered, so you will have to rely on the Windows Battery slider.

Cinebench R20 shows reduced single-core score on battery power

The somewhat reduced PL1 on battery does affect single-core performance significantly. A quick Cinebench R20 run shows that the single-core score is reduced by as much as 24% when on battery power while multi-core score remains more or less unchanged.

Check out our dedicated Core i7-11370H page for information and benchmarks.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø838 (829.86-923.19)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1020 (1012.38-1037.83)

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; CPU Multi 64Bit; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)

HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)

HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø996 (940.2-1110.59)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 7350, n=106, last 2 years)	4107 Points ∼100% +101%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	2548 Points ∼62% +24%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	2401 Points ∼58% +17%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	2382 Points ∼58% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	2299 Points ∼56% +12%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2223 Points ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	2152 Points ∼52% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1438 - 2578, n=11)	2146 Points ∼52% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	2047 Points ∼50%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	1033 Points ∼25% -50%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	601 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	592 Points ∼99% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	589 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Multimedia (316 - 792, n=106, last 2 years)	584 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (475 - 601, n=11)	566 Points ∼94% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	563 Points ∼94%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	515 Points ∼86% -9%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	503 Points ∼84% -11%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	466 Points ∼78% -17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	452 Points ∼75% -20%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (3127 - 19147, n=109, last 2 years)	11015 Points ∼100% +103%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	6646 (6493.56^min - 6646.41^max) Points ∼60% +23%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	6394 Points ∼58% +18%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	6182 Points ∼56% +14%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	6136 (5867.5^min - 6136.37^max) Points ∼56% +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5639 Points ∼51% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5344 (4894.88^min - 5344.23^max) Points ∼49% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3696 - 6646, n=12)	5563 Points ∼51% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	5420 Points ∼49%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	2725 Points ∼25% -50%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1556 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	1553 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Multimedia (819 - 2054, n=107, last 2 years)	1547 Points ∼99% +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1529 Points ∼98% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	1478 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1081 - 1556, n=11)	1469 Points ∼94% -1%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	1337 Points ∼86% -10%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	1242 Points ∼80% -16%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1167 Points ∼75% -21%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (570 - 3023, n=118, last 2 years)	1822 Points ∼100% +97%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1112 (946.23^min - 1112.47^max) Points ∼61% +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1049 (765.3^min - 1048.55^max) Points ∼58% +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	960 (781.11^min - 959.72^max) Points ∼53% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	917 (836.45^min - 917.33^max) Points ∼50% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	1038 (1012.38^min - 1037.83^max) Points ∼57% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1035 Points ∼57% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1018 (914.45^min - 1017.58^max) Points ∼56% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (606 - 1086, n=17)	946 Points ∼52% +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	925 (891.54^min - 924.6^max) Points ∼51% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	923 (829.86^min - 923.19^max) Points ∼51%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	507 (462.5^min - 507.21^max) Points ∼28% -45%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	233 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	231 Points ∼99% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	232 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	229 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Multimedia (119 - 297, n=106, last 2 years)	228 Points ∼98% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	220 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (162.9 - 233, n=15)	220 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	198 Points ∼85% -10%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	197 Points ∼85% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	180 Points ∼77% -18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	177 Points ∼76% -20%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	966 Seconds * ∼100% -72%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	563 Seconds * ∼58%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	538 Seconds * ∼56% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (432 - 762, n=11)	531 Seconds * ∼55% +6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	524 Seconds * ∼54% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	507 Seconds * ∼52% +10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	499 Seconds * ∼52% +11%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	490 Seconds * ∼51% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	458 Seconds * ∼47% +19%
Average of class Multimedia (166 - 956, n=101, last 2 years)	341 Seconds * ∼35% +39%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5411 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	5393 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	5317 MIPS ∼98% 0%
Average of class Multimedia (2898 - 6591, n=99, last 2 years)	5313 MIPS ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	5298 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5074 - 5550, n=11)	5290 MIPS ∼98% 0%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	4694 MIPS ∼87% -11%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	4599 MIPS ∼85% -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4292 MIPS ∼79% -19%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4268 MIPS ∼79% -19%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (11813 - 78016, n=99, last 2 years)	45740 MIPS ∼100% +89%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	31060 MIPS ∼68% +28%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	27015 MIPS ∼59% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	26652 MIPS ∼58% +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	25382 MIPS ∼55% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (18961 - 28520, n=11)	25340 MIPS ∼55% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	24192 MIPS ∼53%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	24188 MIPS ∼53% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	23914 MIPS ∼52% -1%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	13422 MIPS ∼29% -45%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	1607 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Multimedia (843 - 2001, n=106, last 2 years)	1590 Points ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1574 Points ∼98% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	1562 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1376 - 1607, n=10)	1540 Points ∼96% -1%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	1406 Points ∼87% -10%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	1352 Points ∼84% -13%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1119 Points ∼70% -28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1101 Points ∼69% -30%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (3307 - 15348, n=106, last 2 years)	9024 Points ∼100% +77%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	6115 Points ∼68% +20%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5523 Points ∼61% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3828 - 6115, n=10)	5258 Points ∼58% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5214 Points ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	5088 Points ∼56%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4792 Points ∼53% -6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	4695 Points ∼52% -8%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	2983 Points ∼33% -41%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia (4.12 - 22.3, n=99, last 2 years)	12.5 fps ∼100% +84%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	8.6 fps ∼69% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	7.81 fps ∼62% +15%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	7.7 fps ∼62% +13%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	7.6 fps ∼61% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (4.98 - 8.82, n=11)	7.24 fps ∼58% +6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7.23 fps ∼58% +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	6.91 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	6.8 fps ∼54%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	3.99 fps ∼32% -41%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	67.3 s * ∼100% -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	59.8 s * ∼89% -31%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	51.9 s * ∼77% -14%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 89.1, n=99, last 2 years)	49.9 s * ∼74% -10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	49.6 s * ∼74% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	47.5 s * ∼71% -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	47.3 s * ∼70% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23.6 - 56.5, n=11)	45.9 s * ∼68% -1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	45.5 s * ∼68%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	41.1 s * ∼61% +10%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Realme Book (Slim) Intel Core i3-1115G4	0.636 sec * ∼100% -12%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.634 sec * ∼100% -11%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	0.629 sec * ∼99% -10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.622 sec * ∼98% -9%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H	0.57 sec * ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (0.544 - 0.596, n=11)	0.564 sec * ∼89% +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	0.552 sec * ∼87% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H	0.552 sec * ∼87% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H	0.548 sec * ∼86% +4%
Average of class Multimedia (0.4067 - 0.994, n=101, last 2 years)	0.538 sec * ∼85% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

923 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

96.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

220 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	96 pt ∼96%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	75.4 pt ∼75%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	70.6 pt ∼71%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	68.5 pt ∼69%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	67.3 pt ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H	66.2 pt ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64.4 pt ∼64%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (2677 - 24067, n=87, last 2 years)	10654 KRay/s ∼100% +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8256 KRay/s ∼77% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	8076 KRay/s ∼76% +14%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	7628 KRay/s ∼72% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5204 - 8413, n=10)	7260 KRay/s ∼68% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	7253 KRay/s ∼68% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7055 KRay/s ∼66%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia (12762 - 102584, n=87, last 2 years)	55572 Points ∼100% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	46732 Points ∼84% +58%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41815 Points ∼75% +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33876 Points ∼61% +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	32510 Points ∼59% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23958 - 34020, n=10)	30771 Points ∼55% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29538 Points ∼53%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia (841 - 4420, n=87, last 2 years)	2609 MB/s ∼100% +34%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2289 MB/s ∼88% +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	2212 MB/s ∼85% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1656 - 2297, n=10)	2074 MB/s ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1952 MB/s ∼75%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	1445 MB/s ∼55% -26%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	1354 MB/s ∼52% -31%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia (31314 - 116624, n=87, last 2 years)	82987 Points ∼100% +57%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	68309 Points ∼82% +29%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52930 Points ∼64%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52840 Points ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	52760 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (42086 - 52930, n=10)	50786 Points ∼61% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	45665 Points ∼55% -14%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	9007 Points ∼100% +82%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 14070, n=87, last 2 years)	8327 Points ∼92% +68%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	7320 Points ∼81% +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5023 Points ∼56% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4950 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	4839 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3755 - 5027, n=10)	4736 Points ∼53% -4%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Multimedia (7417 - 54962, n=87, last 2 years)	29893 Points ∼100% +68%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	25410 Points ∼85% +43%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	21894 Points ∼73% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20380 Points ∼68% +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	18600 Points ∼62% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (14433 - 20417, n=10)	18332 Points ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	17805 Points ∼60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	76866 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	73305 MB/s ∼95% +5%
Average of class Multimedia (16367 - 151546, n=87, last 2 years)	72777 MB/s ∼95% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69857 MB/s ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (44267 - 76866, n=10)	68494 MB/s ∼89% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	45567 MB/s ∼59% -35%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41342 MB/s ∼54% -41%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia (228 - 1206, n=94, last 2 years)	672 MB/s ∼100% +78%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	478 MB/s ∼71% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	419 MB/s ∼62% +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	411 MB/s ∼61% +9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	392 MB/s ∼58% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	378 MB/s ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (289 - 422, n=10)	377 MB/s ∼56% 0%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (1501 - 12875, n=88, last 2 years)	5747 KRay/s ∼100% +50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	4554 KRay/s ∼79% +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4483 KRay/s ∼78% +17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	4183 KRay/s ∼73% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (2756 - 4551, n=10)	3927 KRay/s ∼68% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	3919 KRay/s ∼68% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3819 KRay/s ∼66%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40069 MPixel/s ∼100% +74%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 52727, n=88, last 2 years)	29055 MPixel/s ∼73% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (15892 - 40069, n=10)	28235 MPixel/s ∼70% +23%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23024 MPixel/s ∼57%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	22901 MPixel/s ∼57% -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	21625 MPixel/s ∼54% -6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	20549 MPixel/s ∼51% -11%

System Performance

Overall PCMark 10 scores are just about 6% lower than what we've observed with the Acer Swift 3 and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro. In general, we did not face any issues or lag with daily productivity tasks that includes word processing, spreadsheets, light image editing, and web browsing.

The Core i5-1135G7-powered HP Envy 14 seems to have an advantage over the Mi NoteBook Pro in the Productivity and Digital Content Creation components of the test likely due to some helping hand from the dedicated GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (3580 - 8083, n=89, last 2 years)	6096 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5625 Points ∼92% +8%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	5459 Points ∼90% +5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	5410 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5199 - 5459, n=6)	5356 Points ∼88% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5328 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	5199 Points ∼85%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	4886 Points ∼80% -6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4809 Points ∼79% -8%
Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	4390 Points ∼72% -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9996 - 10650, n=6)	10375 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	10241 Points ∼99% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	10191 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Multimedia (7715 - 12144, n=89, last 2 years)	10006 Points ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	9996 Points ∼96%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	9244 Points ∼89% -8%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	9242 Points ∼89% -8%
Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	9090 Points ∼88% -9%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	9036 Points ∼87% -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	8568 Points ∼83% -14%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	9662 Points ∼100% +39%
Average of class Multimedia (5462 - 11186, n=89, last 2 years)	8411 Points ∼87% +21%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	8342 Points ∼86% +20%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	7388 Points ∼76% +6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	7273 Points ∼75% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6911 - 7388, n=6)	7057 Points ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	6960 Points ∼72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	6911 Points ∼72% -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	6622 Points ∼69% -5%
Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	6488 Points ∼67% -7%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (2679 - 11777, n=89, last 2 years)	7445 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5880 Points ∼79% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	5838 Points ∼78% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5828 Points ∼78% +6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	5701 Points ∼77% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5483 - 5838, n=6)	5699 Points ∼77% +4%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	5483 Points ∼74%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4934 Points ∼66% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	4709 Points ∼63% -14%
Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	3895 Points ∼52% -29%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5025 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		2996 points
PCMark 10 Score		5199 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64524 MB/s ∼100% +69%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (38100 - 64524, n=5)	50883 MB/s ∼79% +34%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 92447, n=88, last 2 years)	50109 MB/s ∼78% +32%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	39127 MB/s ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38100 MB/s ∼59%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	36660 MB/s ∼57% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	34705 MB/s ∼54% -9%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62417 MB/s ∼100% +52%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 79656, n=87, last 2 years)	52103 MB/s ∼83% +27%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (40993 - 62417, n=5)	51755 MB/s ∼83% +26%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	47024 MB/s ∼75% +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	43278 MB/s ∼69% +6%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40993 MB/s ∼66%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	40404 MB/s ∼65% -1%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65610 MB/s ∼100% +63%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 92869, n=87, last 2 years)	52532 MB/s ∼80% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (40211 - 65610, n=5)	52007 MB/s ∼79% +29%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41223 MB/s ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	40394 MB/s ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40211 MB/s ∼61%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	34029 MB/s ∼52% -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, Vega 7	119 ns * ∼100% -39%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	99.9 ns * ∼84% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89.1 ns * ∼75% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (83.1 - 91.3, n=5)	87.7 ns * ∼74% -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	87.3 ns * ∼73% -2%
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 133.9, n=93, last 2 years)	85.7 ns * ∼72% -0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	85.5 ns * ∼72%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

The Mi NoteBook Pro shows the highest DPC latency so far among competing laptops featuring this processor. We observed the interrupt to process latency spiking as soon as the default web browser was opened. Adding Prime95 after playback of our test YouTube 4K video increased the value to 5487.3 µs.

We noticed that the Windows Driver Mode Framework, Wdf01000.sys, is the main contributor to this increased latency. Wdf01000.sys itself does not cause high latencies but is rather influenced by other erratic drivers, such as ACPI.sys in this case.

We did not particularly notice any issues in high-resolution video playback, though users may potentially run into hiccups while working with real-time audio and video editing workflows.

Check out our DPC Latency Ranking page for more latency comparisons across reviewed devices.

The Mi NoteBook Pro suffers from high DPC latency

Highest interrupt to process latency after YouTube and Prime95

Windows Kernel Mode Driver Framework seems to have the highest execution time

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	5487 μs * ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5117 μs * ∼93% +7%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	3239 μs * ∼59% +41%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2489 μs * ∼45% +55%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	1087 μs * ∼20% +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	796 μs * ∼15% +85%
Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	670 μs * ∼12% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	435.4 μs * ∼8% +92%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The YMTC PC005 SSD is just enclosed in a thin metal envelope without proper thermal pads

The Mi NoteBook Pro is the first laptop we've tested that features the YMTC PC005 Active NVMe SSD, which made its debut in 2020. For those not in the know, YMTC is China's homegrown SSD maker with an in-house-developed 3D Xtacking NAND.

The performance of the PC005 Active is on par with a Western Digital PC SN730 drive. However, our DiskSpd read loop test at a queue depth of 8 reveals significant throttling issues.

Xiaomi cheaps out on including a proper thermal pad on the SSD and just encloses the drive in a thin metal envelope instead. The significant throttling seen could, therefore, be due to the poor thermals on the SSD although an issue with the YMTC controller itself cannot be fully ruled out.

	Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro YMTC PC005 Active 512GB	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Realme Book (Slim) Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	Average YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
AS SSD		0%	-5%	-164%	-10%	-38%	-20%	-29%	0%
Seq Read	2633	2775 5%	2015 -23%	1972 -25%	2127 -19%	1960 -26%	1784 -32%	2349 -11%	2633 0%
Seq Write	1390	1436 3%	1055 -24%	981 -29%	1427 3%	1547 11%	742 -47%	826 -41%	1390 0%
4K Read	44.62	49.34 11%	73.9 66%	55.8 25%	52.5 18%	31.56 -29%	58.3 31%	54.7 23%	44.6 0%
4K Write	132.3	198.3 50%	223.2 69%	133.5 1%	122.9 -7%	116.6 -12%	141.9 7%	162.1 23%	132.3 0%
4K-64 Read	966	1270 31%	589 -39%	1277 32%	947 -2%	454.7 -53%	582 -40%	788 -18%	966 0%
4K-64 Write	1194	846 -29%	1029 -14%	313.9 -74%	1598 34%	262.1 -78%	1047 -12%	832 -30%	1194 0%
Access Time Read *	0.043	0.046 -7%	0.056 -30%	0.15 -249%	0.072 -67%		0.052 -21%	0.125 -191%	0.043 -0%
Access Time Write *	0.025	0.054 -116%	0.039 -56%	0.513 -1952%	0.09 -260%	0.034 -36%	0.046 -84%	0.023 8%	0.025 -0%
Score Read	1274	1597 25%	865 -32%	1530 20%	1212 -5%	682 -46%	819 -36%	1078 -15%	1274 0%
Score Write	1465	1188 -19%	1358 -7%	546 -63%	1864 27%	533 -64%	1263 -14%	1077 -26%	1465 0%
Score Total	3337	3541 6%	2644 -21%	2819 -16%	3674 10%	1552 -53%	2469 -26%	2645 -21%	3337 0%
Copy ISO MB/s	2296	1768 -23%	1186 -48%	1105 -52%	1605 -30%	974 -58%	1067 -54%	1034 -55%	2296 0%
Copy Program MB/s	422	532 26%	782 85%	799 89%	847 101%	356.5 -16%	597 41%	349.4 -17%	422 0%
Copy Game MB/s	998	1413 42%	1028 3%	957 -4%	1632 64%	621 -38%	1019 2%	698 -30%	998 0%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		1%	-11%	-18%	-11%	-28%	-33%	-16%	0%
Write 4K	159	136.4 -14%	171.8 8%	136 -14%	119.7 -25%	98.8 -38%	94.8 -40%	147.1 -7%	159 0%
Read 4K	52.5	45.68 -13%	79.4 51%	60.4 15%	45.28 -14%	32.44 -38%	48.93 -7%	56 7%	52.5 0%
Write Seq	1718	2151 25%	1099 -36%	1447 -16%	1951 14%	1582 -8%	1059 -38%	1175 -32%	1718 0%
Read Seq	2586	2062 -20%	1847 -29%	1507 -42%	2252 -13%	1471 -43%	1620 -37%	1810 -30%	2586 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	477.6	515 8%	539 13%	235.6 -51%	438.1 -8%	375.4 -21%	400 -16%	447.3 -6%	478 0%
Read 4K Q32T1	539	537 0%	555 3%	737 37%	312.8 -42%	491.9 -9%	377.2 -30%	493.9 -8%	539 0%
Write Seq Q32T1	2483	3093 25%	1095 -56%	1529 -38%	2348 -5%	1574 -37%	1136 -54%	1234 -50%	2483 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	3446	3386 -2%	1988 -42%	2357 -32%	3529 2%	2329 -32%	2073 -40%	3102 -10%	3446 0%
Write 4K Q8T8	490.8							496.1 1%	491 0%
Read 4K Q8T8	1133							902 -20%	1133 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 1%	-8% / -7%	-91% / -111%	-11% / -10%	-33% / -34%	-27% / -25%	-23% / -23%	0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

YMTC PC005 Active 512GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3446 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2483 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 539 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 477.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2586 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1718 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 159 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 490.8 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1133 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro: Ø2319 (1545.45-3219.19)

GPU Performance

Unlike the RedmiBook Pro 15, the Mi NoteBook Pro does not feature a discrete GPU so it has to rely on the integrated Iris Xe Graphics G7. The iGPU's performance is not really convincing. We see considerably higher scores in 3DMark tests with the Acer Swift 3 and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro powered by the same chip.

In less intensive tests such as 3DMark Cloud Gate and Ice Storm Extreme, the Acer Swift 3 powered by the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U and Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics manages to score a decent lead over the Mi NoteBook Pro.

Only a slight 2% decrease in 3DMark Time Spy scores is observed when running on battery.

3DMark Time Spy shows about a 2% hit in scores on battery

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (1365 - 60250, n=96, last 2 years)	15453 Points ∼100% +145%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7	11055 Points ∼72% +75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H	7983 Points ∼52% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	7115 Points ∼46% +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	6904 Points ∼45% +9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7471, n=155)	6329 Points ∼41% 0%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	6311 Points ∼41%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	5731 Points ∼37% -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	4990 Points ∼32% -21%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4	3902 Points ∼25% -38%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Multimedia (1245 - 23208, n=96, last 2 years)	10888 Points ∼100% +137%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7	10250 Points ∼94% +123%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	6955 Points ∼64% +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	6786 Points ∼62% +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H	5836 Points ∼54% +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1926 - 7238, n=154)	5417 Points ∼50% +18%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	4593 Points ∼42%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R5 5500U	4514 Points ∼41% -2%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4	4354 Points ∼40% -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	3663 Points ∼34% -20%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7	51846 Points ∼100% +138%
Average of class Multimedia (6498 - 150699, n=77, last 2 years)	50131 Points ∼97% +130%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	33402 Points ∼64% +53%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	29175 Points ∼56% +34%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38040, n=142)	26040 Points ∼50% +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H	25467 Points ∼49% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	22895 Points ∼44% +5%
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	21823 Points ∼42%
Realme Book (Slim) Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4	19209 Points ∼37% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (920 - 46022, n=95, last 2 years)	11425 Points ∼100% +186%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7	8131 Points ∼71% +103%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	5771 Points ∼51% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-11370H	5652 Points ∼49% +41%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6143, n=167)