Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 950 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Samsung Xclipse 920

Samsung Xclipse 950

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 950

The Samsung Xclipse 950 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2500 SoC. It is based on an RDNA 3 architecture including ray tracing support. It uses 8 WGPs (compared to 6 in the previous generation Xclipse 940) and offers 28% faster ray tracing in hardware.

The Exynos 2500 is manufactured in the 3nm GAA process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 950Qualcomm Adreno 619Samsung Xclipse 920
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified192 - unified
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology3 nm8 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 15.12.2015 18.01.2022
ArchitectureAdreno 600RDNA 2
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
CodenameRDNA 2
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps
Samsung Xclipse 950Qualcomm Adreno 619Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift306060
Genshin Impact37362759.559.358.2
Armajet6067
PUBG Mobile3940314439.532
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
Samsung Xclipse 950Qualcomm Adreno 619Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 19. 18:53:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13074 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752943998s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:29:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13074 +0.018s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 13074 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.042s

#12 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.038s ... 0.08s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.08s

#14 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.085s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.092s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.094s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.109s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.109s

#22 Got 133 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.126s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.126s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.127s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.13s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.13s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)