Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 950 vs Samsung Xclipse 920

Samsung Xclipse 950

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 950

The Samsung Xclipse 950 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2500 SoC. It is based on an RDNA 3 architecture including ray tracing support. It uses 8 WGPs (compared to 6 in the previous generation Xclipse 940) and offers 28% faster ray tracing in hardware.

The Exynos 2500 is manufactured in the 3nm GAA process at Samsung.

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 950Samsung Xclipse 920
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified192 - unified
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology3 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 18.01.2022
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2294 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
20027 Points (10%)
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5151 Points (6%)
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
11178 Points (5%)
3589 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
33 fps (12%)
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
77 fps (14%)
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
189 fps (14%)
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
178 fps (17%)
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
281 fps (6%)
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
411 fps (17%)
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 950
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
499 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
597510 Points (41%)
402385 Points (28%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
336 fps (8%)
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
19473 Points (5%)
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
19956 Points (5%)
8695 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 950 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 43% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 950:
57  fps
102%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 950:
89  fps
49%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 950:
60  fps
53%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 950:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 950:
115  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 950 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 68%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 68%

Samsung Xclipse 950Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact5759.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile8960404439.532
Samsung Xclipse 950Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 27. 03:58:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13074 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766804314s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:20:15 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13074 +0.017s ... 0.042s

#9 got single benchmarks 13074 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.047s

#11 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.058s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.067s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.067s

#19 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.073s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.073s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.073s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.076s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.076s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)