Notebookcheck Logo

The better smartphone gets the worse review score? Xiaomi T-Series in comparison

Xiaomi 17T Review
ⓘ Notebookcheck (Daniel Schmidt)
Xiaomi 17T Review
The new Xiaomi 17T doesn’t break any records in our review, but it delivers a great value in the mid‑range segment. Priced under $700, it features an impressive Leica camera and surpasses the Xiaomi 15T in several key areas. Read our review verdict to see, why the 2026 model still ends up with a lower overall score.

Shortly after its market launch, the Xiaomi 17T has proven to be an exciting mid-range alternative thanks to a rapid drop in price. Online retailers are already offering it for under $700 (available on Amazon.com).

Compared to its predecessor, the Xiaomi 15T, the new 2026 model introduces several upgrades that noticeably improve everyday usability. Beyond the smaller OLED display, which results in a more compact form factor, though whether that’s an advantage is certainly subjective, the Xiaomi 17T offers clear gains in battery endurance and zoom photography.

Thanks to a new, optically stabilized telephoto lens with 5x magnification, the 2026 model takes better zoom photos with plenty of detail without making them appear unnaturally oversharpened. In addition, Xiaomi’s new T-series smartphone delivers a really good battery life of around 21 hours in a real-world Wi-Fi test - an increase of four hours, or 23 percent, over the Xiaomi 15T.

But why isn’t this enough for the Xiaomi 17T to achieve a better result in our review score?

The MediaTek Dimensity 8500 throttles significantly in the Xiaomi 17T, especially compared with its predecessor

 The Xiaomi 17T is particularly competitive when it comes to the photo quality of Leica cameras.
The Xiaomi 17T is particularly competitive when it comes to the photo quality delivered by its Leica cameras.

In terms of performance, the Xiaomi 17T also offers a slight improvement over its predecessor. The built-in MediaTek Dimensity 8500, together with the Mali-G720 MP8, sometimes achieves (slightly) better scores than the Dimensity 8400 - though only when the device is cool.

Once the Xiaomi 17T reaches operating temperature, it begins to throttle, so the nominal performance advantage disappears after a short time in the 3DMark stress tests. Under heavy load, the Xiaomi 17T throttles by up to 40 percent, making it less consistent than the 15T. In the Wild Life stress test, the predecessor therefore achieves a significantly better average frame rate of 66.1 fps, compared with 57.6 fps for the Xiaomi 17T.

Because of the more noticeable performance drop, the Xiaomi 17T receives a downgrade in our performance rating, which ultimately lowers its overall score. Still, for anyone who doesn’t use their smartphone for video editing or heavy gaming, the 2026 model remains the better choice.

3DMark Stress Tests

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.6 (51.8-78.8) %
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.1 (64.2-66.6) %

Source(s)

Xiaomi 17T Review

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 08 > The better smartphone gets the worse review score? Xiaomi T-Series in comparison
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-08-12 (Update: 2026-08- 9)