Notebookcheck

The Best Smartphones for Less Than 500 Euros

November 2020 update. Not too long ago the price bracket between 500 to 600 Euros was occupied primarily by flagship devices. Nowadays, these have moved on and can usually be found in price ranges north of 1,000 Euros, leaving the bracket around 500 Euros for occasional affordable high-end devices as well as older top-of-the-line premium smartphones. The latter may not be up-to-date any longer but can still be a great alternative.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (translated by Finn D. Boerne),

Upper-class smartphones are located in the price range of between mainstream and high-end models and are targeted towards users who are not willing to pay more than 700 Euros (~$870) for an expensive high-end phone, but still want good performance, good cameras, and nice build quality.

The price range of up to 500 Euros (~$620) includes both powerful upper-class models as well as old high-end smartphones. The latter are an interesting alternative, because the specifications are usually still very good and often receive at least one major update. The following rankings might be interesting for you as well:

The Best High-End Smartphones

Pos.
Datum
Bew.
Bild
Modell
Dicke
Gewicht
SBR
Größe
Bildwiederholrate
Auflösung
OS
Preis ab
1
04/2020
87 %Huawei P40Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.5 mm175 g87 %6.10"60 Hz2340x1080Android 10
2
03/2019
87 %Samsung Galaxy S10Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.8 mm157 g88 %6.10"60 Hz3040x1440Android 9.0 Pie
3
07/2020
86 %Xiaomi Poco F2 ProXiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm Adreno 650
6 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.9 mm219 g87.2 %6.67"60 Hz2400x1080Android 10
4
03/2019
86 %Xiaomi Mi 9Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.61 mm173 g84 %6.39"60 Hz2340x1080Android 9.0 Pie
5
11/2019
86 %Google Pixel 4Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.2 mm162 g78 %5.70"90 Hz2280x1080Android 10
6
07/2019
85 %LG G8s ThinQLG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.99 mm181 g82 %6.20"60 Hz2248x1080Android 9.0 Pie
7
05/2020
85 %Apple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
3 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
7.3 mm148 g65 %4.70"60 Hz1334x750Apple iOS 13
8
07/2019
85 %ZTE Axon 10 ProZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm178 g88 %6.47"60 Hz2340x1080Android 9.0 Pie
9
04/2018
85 %Samsung Galaxy S9Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.5 mm163 g84 %5.80"60 Hz2960x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
10
07/2020
Neu
85 %LG VelvetLG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm Adreno 620
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.85 mm180 g88 %6.80"60 Hz2460x1080Android 10

The table above contains an overview over the best smartphones for less than 500 Euros reviewed by Notebookcheck over the course of the past 12 months as well as still relevant and available older products. In cases of identical score the more recent device is listed first. All prices in above table and price comparisons are updated daily and can thus differ.

Editors' Comments

This month, the LG Velvet makes this list and enters on 10th place.

1st – Huawei P40

Huawei P40

With its 6.1-inch large OLED display Huawei's P40 is a comparatively compact smartphone with powerful components. It is powered by a Kirin 990 5G with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, the latter of which can be expanded via nano memory card. In addition to Wi-Fi 6 and 5G the P40 also supports a wide variety of LTE bands, and should thus be able to connect to networks world-wide.

The camera is not as sophisticated as it is on the Pro model with the same moniker. However, its main sensor remained identical, albeit it lacks the former’s OIS. The zoom lens (3x optical, 5x hybrid, 30x digital) continues to feature optical image stabilization. The third lens on this triple-camera array is an ultra-wide angle lens.

In our test, the P40 performed fairly well and did not exhibit any major flaws. The smartphone is only protected against splash water, and it lacks support for wireless charging. Like all recent Huawei smartphones it also lacks Google’s services.

Pricecompare

2nd - Samsung Galaxy S10

Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Galaxy S10

The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a 6.1-inch Curved Dynamic AMOLED display, where the front glass is only interrupted by a gap for the two front cameras. Depending on the model, you either get a ceramic or glass rear cover (Gorilla Glass 5). The frame is always made of stainless steel and results in a very sophisticated impression.

The Galaxy smartphone is powered by a fast Exynos 9820 SoC in combination with 8 GB RAM and up to 512 GB internal storage, which is expandable via microSD card. You will usually get the 128 GB SKU for less than 500 Euros. Fast LTE and Wi-Fi 6 are also included, while other connectivity includes Bluetooth 5.0 with dual-audio, MST, Ant+, and NFC. The list of features is pretty complete and it also supports wireless charging in both directions, so you can also charge other devices with your smartphone via induction. We also like the versatile cameras, even though the results are not perfect.

There are not many drawbacks. The battery runtimes during the review were not great and is is not very enduring in everyday situations, either. The facial recognition is certainly not as secure as a high quality 3D recognition, and the Korean manufacturer still does not include aptX HD for its high-end smartphone.

Pricecompare

3rd – Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro

Poco F2 Pro

The Poco F2 Pro is Xiaomi’s attempt to continue the first Pocophone’s legacy, which offered flagship quality components at mid-range prices. It comes with an extremely bright super AMOLED display with decent color accuracy and support for HDR content running at 60 Hz. The smartphone is powered by a Snapdragon 865 with either 6 or 8 GB of RAM and either 128 or 256 GB of non-expandable storage. It continues to feature an IR blaster as well as a 3.5-inch headphone jack.

The smartphone’s quad-camera array performed fairly well in our test. Unfortunately, it lacks optical zoom capabilities, and the ultra-wide angle lens was not the greatest either. In return, premium features such as IP certification and wireless charging, are supported.

Pricecompare

4th - Xiaomi Mi 9

Xiaomi Mi 9
Xiaomi Mi 9

The Xiaomi Mi 9 is a powerful smartphone with high-end ambitions for a very good price. It does not only offer a very big 6.39-inch AMOLED screen (16.23 cm, 100.2 cm²), but also a bright backlight and well-balanced colors. If you select the global ROM SKU, you also get the required DRM certification to stream corresponding contents in HD, which was not a matter of course for previous Xiaomi smartphones. 

The Mi 9 is shipped with powerful hardware including a Snapdragon 855, 6 GB RAM and 64 or 128 GB internal storage. However, you cannot expand the storage, so you should not save money at the wrong end. We also liked the camera during our review and the battery runtime is okay, despite the comparatively small battery.

Pricecompare

5th – Google Pixel 4

Google Pixel 4

The Google Pixel 4 has dropped in price significantly over the past few months, and it has quite a lot to offer: 5.7-inch 90 Hz OLED display, fast SoC, IP68 certification, wireless charging, 3D face detection, and last but not last the guarantee that it will receive updates for a very long time.

Its dual-lens camera performed very well in our test, particularly its main camera with the additional 2x optical zoom. The speakers were also one of its highlights.

The biggest downside is without a doubt the fact that storage is not expandable, which is particularly troublesome for the 64 GB SKU.

Pricecompare

6th - LG G8s ThinQ

LG G8s ThinQ

The LG G8s ThinQ offers everything you expect from a modern smartphone. The 6.2-inch P-OLED screen has a resolution of 2248 x 1080 pixels and comes with a comparatively wide notch, which looks similar to the iPhone. However, this notch contains the real highlight of the smartphone – a ToF sensor from Infineon. It does not only enable better portraits and perhaps the fastest 3D facial recognition right now, but also wireless gesture controls. The latter is a good idea from LG, but the handling takes time getting used to and the functionality is still limited.

At the back you get a triple-camera with an additional ultra wide-angle as well as a telephoto. The battery capacity is comparatively small with 3550 mAh, but LG still manages to squeeze good runtimes out of it. The smartphone is also protected against dust and water according to IP68, has passed 14 tests according to the military standard MIL-STD 810G and supports wireless charging. A pretty complete package for less than 500 Euros.

Pricecompare

7th – Apple iPhone SE (2020)

Apple iPhone SE2
Apple iPhone SE2

Apple’s Apple iPhone SE (2020) is based on the iPhone 8 and features the exact same case with identical footprint and somewhat antiquated display to body ratio. In return, its internal hardware is up to date as it features Apple’s fastest currently available SoC as well as numerous other noteworthy features, such as Wi-Fi 6, wireless charging, or an IP67 certification.

All in all Apple did a great job with the SE2, but it is not free of disappointments, namely the included power supply, the fairly limited single-lens camera, and its below average call quality.

Pricecompare

8th - ZTE Axon 10 Pro

ZTE Axon 10 Pro

The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features good specs with its 6.47-inch AMOLED screen (FHD+), a fast Snapdragon 855 with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal storage, which can be expanded. The 48 MP main camera is supported by an ultra wide-angle as well as a telephoto to ensure good picture quality.

The 4000 mAh battery ensures long battery runtimes and can be quickly charged via cable, but wireless charging is also supported. Only the panel brightness could have been higher.

Pricecompare

9th - Samsung Galaxy S9

Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Galaxy S9

Samsung's Galaxy S9 is once again a powerful smartphone, but there are only small changes compared to the previous model. The hardware specs are very good with a new and powerful Exynos SoC, 4 GB RAM and 64/256 GB of UFS 2.1 storage. The display was slightly tuned as well and the bezels, which were slim to begin with, are even smaller than before. Otherwise, the S9-series offers great features as well: LTE Cat. 18, Bluetooth 5.0, storage expansion via microSD, IP67 certification, wireless charging, USB 3.1 with DisplayPort support, a fingerprint as well as Iris scanner and more. This also includes a new dual-camera, which can automatically switch between an f/1.5 and f/2.4 aperture depending on the lighting conditions and takes great pictures.

Thanks to the update to Android 9.0 Pie and the One UI, Bixby now finally supports German. The Samsung smartphone also gets a bit bigger and heavier. The battery is identical to the previous model, but the battery runtime is still not very convincing and worse than its predecessor. It is also unfortunate that the Korean company only equips the Galaxy S9 with a single-camera solution. One fact that is only rarely talked about: The Galaxy S9 is much better protected against drops than before.

Pricecompare

10th – LG Velvet

LG Velvet

The LG Velvet features a 6.8-inch POLED display and can be expanded with an equally large dual screen. Its mid-range SoC performed adequately, and where available the LG Velvet will also connect to 5G networks. Gaming required some compromises but in return it features a decent triple-camera array, USB 3.2, wireless charging, and last but not least an IP68 and MIL-STD certification.

Unfortunately, its wide-angle camera did not perform as well as expected, and LTE band support is fairly limited. Battery life on the other hand was decent.

Pricecompare

Best Smartphones for Less Than 500 Euros in Comparison

Size Comparison

167.08 mm / 6.58 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 219 g0.4828 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 73.4 mm / 2.89 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 178 g0.3924 lbs157.5 mm / 6.2 inch 74.67 mm / 2.94 inch 7.61 mm / 0.2996 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs155.3 mm / 6.11 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 7.99 mm / 0.3146 inch 181 g0.399 lbs149.9 mm / 5.9 inch 70.4 mm / 2.77 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 157 g0.3461 lbs148.9 mm / 5.86 inch 71.1 mm / 2.8 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 175 g0.3858 lbs147.7 mm / 5.81 inch 68.7 mm / 2.7 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 163 g0.3594 lbs147.1 mm / 5.79 inch 68.8 mm / 2.71 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 162 g0.3571 lbs138.4 mm / 5.45 inch 67.3 mm / 2.65 inch 7.3 mm / 0.2874 inch 148 g0.3263 lbs

Test Results

Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (3, 5)
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
10 (5, 5)
4.4 (2.4, 2)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
8 (3, 5)
36.8 (9.2, 27.6)
3.6 (2, 1.6)
8 (3, 5)
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
Response Time Black / White *
6 (3, 3)
4 (2, 2)
8 (5, 3)
4 (2, 2)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
6 (3, 3)
21.2 (6, 15.2)
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
6 (3, 3)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
PWM Frequency
245
240.4 (99)
177.3
245.1 (99)
367.6
235
277.8 (99)
240.4
245.1 (99)
Screen
Brightness middle
583
701
799
593
554
539
688
402
529
586
Brightness
593
705
801
587
550
556
659
399
527
587
Brightness Distribution
94
98
97
94
94
88
92
92
96
97
Black Level *
0.28
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.03
3.7
1.46
0.9
0.8
3.78
1
4.1
1.4
2.8
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.33
10.3
2.92
2
1.4
6.95
2.2
6.5
4
6.3
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.4
2.7
1.5
1.3
2.2
1.7
3.7
1.6
2.3
Gamma
2.301 96%
2.1 105%
2.237 98%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.274 97%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.01 109%
CCT
6621 98%
6553 99%
6003 108%
6548 99%
6213 105%
6013 108%
6790 96%
7841 83%
6358 102%
6827 95%
Contrast
2457
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
39.9
37.4
42.3
31.8
35.5
38
40.5
41.4
35.4
34.5
Maximum Bottom *
41.3
37.3
40.1
30.9
34.5
38.4
41.4
40.9
36.2
32.2
Idle Upper Side *
31.5
28.8
34.5
28.3
27.2
33.7
36
28.8
23.2
29
Idle Bottom *
30.8
27.8
32.3
27.8
26.9
32.4
31.4
27.5
22.7
27.5
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
2063
1259
1954
1650
1007
1689
1938
1927
1182
WiFi v1.3
806
427
923
546
460
693
694
680
474
741
Load
236
170
286
194
185
203
143
217
164
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
1
0.61
2
0.67
1.01
1.2
0.44
0.76
0.65
0.66
Idle Average *
1.9
1.27
3.1
1.26
1.63
1.6
1.56
1.15
0.81
1.58
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.3
4
1.29
1.69
2
1.63
1.18
0.92
1.6
Load Average *
3.5
6.17
6.4
3.71
4.67
5
2.32
3.95
4.76
3.3
Load Maximum *
6.9
8.55
11.6
9.3
8.78
10
4.12
7.49
5.16
5.46

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2988 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3399 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2856 Points ∼17%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2573 Points ∼15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2666 Points ∼16%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
3281 Points ∼19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2752 Points ∼16%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1797 Points ∼11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
755 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
923 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
742 Points ∼43%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
746 Points ∼43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
746 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
1336 Points ∼77%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
751 Points ∼43%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 Points ∼32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4924 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2981 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5466 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3754 Points ∼47%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4112 Points ∼52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3309 Points ∼42%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2898 Points ∼36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4235 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2590 Points ∼33%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1898 Points ∼24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6606 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5358 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9466 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7076 Points ∼58%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6383 Points ∼53%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5184 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
7847 Points ∼65%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7083 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3697 Points ∼30%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3547 Points ∼29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6140 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4551 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8145 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5913 Points ∼61%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5685 Points ∼59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4604 Points ∼48%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
5688 Points ∼59%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6162 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3376 Points ∼35%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2934 Points ∼30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4242 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2854 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4958 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3758 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4199 Points ∼79%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3242 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2892 Points ∼54%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4093 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2486 Points ∼47%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3312 Points ∼62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6244 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5176 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8365 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6355 Points ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6214 Points ∼54%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6040 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4573 Points ∼40%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6356 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3553 Points ∼31%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3289 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5651 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4383 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7265 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5509 Points ∼27%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5615 Points ∼28%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5068 Points ∼25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4050 Points ∼20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5661 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3244 Points ∼16%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3278 Points ∼16%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
27 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼15%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼16%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼8%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
29 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼7%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
31 fps ∼13%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼7%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps ∼4%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
42 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼18%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼19%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
49 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼7%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
72 fps ∼12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps ∼7%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼4%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8736 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7595 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10347 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9035 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10254 Points ∼67%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9125 Points ∼60%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9664 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5291 Points ∼35%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7808 Points ∼51%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
450373 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
569967 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
440822 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
376698 Points ∼50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
424308 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
489463 Points ∼65%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
450074 Points ∼60%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308878 Points ∼41%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1260 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1385 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1456 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1378 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1601 Points ∼79%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1171 Points ∼58%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1431 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points ∼54%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1226 Points ∼60%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8634 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7361 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11736 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9270 Points ∼32%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9307 Points ∼32%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8414 Points ∼29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9361 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6373 Points ∼22%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5153 Points ∼18%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6942 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4570 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8874 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4031 Points ∼45%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6458 Points ∼73%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4324 Points ∼49%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6253 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2669 Points ∼30%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4556 Points ∼51%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8992 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7476 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10075 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8441 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8058 Points ∼49%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8718 Points ∼53%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8652 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6234 Points ∼38%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6430 Points ∼39%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5105 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4320 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6273 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4595 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5277 Points ∼62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4389 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5188 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3285 Points ∼39%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3674 Points ∼43%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
66.4 MB/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64.8 MB/s ∼74%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
46.7 MB/s ∼54%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
66.83 MB/s ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67.18 MB/s ∼77%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60.29 MB/s ∼69%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
81.6 MB/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77.9 MB/s ∼81%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67.53 MB/s ∼70%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
88.2 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79.22 MB/s ∼82%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77.77 MB/s ∼81%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
197 MB/s ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24.44 MB/s ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226.45 MB/s ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165.32 MB/s ∼52%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
146.64 MB/s ∼46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.6 MB/s ∼9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189.53 MB/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23.07 MB/s ∼7%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
135.87 MB/s ∼43%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
189.4 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
137.4 MB/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
229.74 MB/s ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
149.36 MB/s ∼41%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122.38 MB/s ∼33%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138 MB/s ∼37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
150.36 MB/s ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
131 MB/s ∼36%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
154.28 MB/s ∼42%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
212.9 MB/s ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.24 MB/s ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
721.95 MB/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388.27 MB/s ∼29%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247.73 MB/s ∼19%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
182.4 MB/s ∼14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503.04 MB/s ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
206.94 MB/s ∼16%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
409.21 MB/s ∼31%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1591.6 MB/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
831.94 MB/s ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1634.45 MB/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666.06 MB/s ∼33%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655.4 MB/s ∼32%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
791.1 MB/s ∼39%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
768.93 MB/s ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
815.43 MB/s ∼40%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
924.54 MB/s ∼45%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
95 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
108 Points ∼36%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94 Points ∼32%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
107 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
146 Points ∼49%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63 Points ∼21%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
76 Points ∼26%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (612min - 683max) MBit/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
770 (741min - 794max) MBit/s ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (549min - 725max) MBit/s ∼39%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼31%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (474min - 617max) MBit/s ∼34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (284min - 694max) MBit/s ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼38%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (558min - 592max) MBit/s ∼33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
859 (755min - 907max) MBit/s ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (430min - 578max) MBit/s ∼30%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼33%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (465min - 517max) MBit/s ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼46%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (481min - 556max) MBit/s ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼29%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s ∼35%
PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
30 (26min - 31max) fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 (11min - 42max) fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 (40min - 61max) fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 (59min - 60max) fps ∼100%
Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > The Best Smartphones for Less Than 500 Euros
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2020-11-19)