Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt (AI-generated)

Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck

Q2 2026 update.

Smartphones with large displays are omnipresent now. Ubiquitous. It's small phones that are hard to find, which is why we came up with a list of the most compact smartphones currently available on the market that have been extensively tested by Notebookcheck and got a good to very good rating.
Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL) Published 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...
Smartphone Apple Android Charts

Just what is a compact smartphone? This is a question that different consumers might have a different answer to. The width/length of the casing, as well as the display diagonal are the most obvious criteria but with display edges becoming ever narrower, the phone's display-to-surface ratio is certainly an important factor, too. Foldables bring another level of complexity into the picture. Although these are rather narrow (or short) when folded, they are considerably thicker than regular phones, too.

We decided to use smartphones' volume as the main criteria. To make the list, a smartphone can't have a volume large than 88,000 mm³ or a length of over 156 mm. Below are the best phones that meet the requirements and were reviewed by us over the last 18 months (with full reviews linked in the table).

Best pocket-friendly smartphones to buy in Q2 2026

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Dimensions
Display
Screen / Body
1.
89.9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon: List Price: 1549€206 g71.9 x 150 x 8.8 mm
94908 mm³
6.30"
2622x1206
458 PPI
OLED
90 %
2.
89.2%
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon:
1. $969.99
XIAOMI 17 5G Ai (Compatible ...
2. $840.00
XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat...
3. $969.99
XIAOMI 17 5G Ai (Compatible ...
List Price: 650€
191 g71.8 x 151.1 x 8.1 mm
87877 mm³
6.30"
2656x1220
464 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
89.5 %
3.
88.9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5 ⎘
IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 1199€207 g72 x 152.8 x 8.6 mm
94614 mm³
6.30"
2856x1280
497 PPI
OLED
87 %
4.
88.3%
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 999€167 g71.7 x 149.6 x 7.2 mm
77230 mm³
6.30"
2340x1080
409 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth
91 %
5.
88%
Vivo X300
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 1049€190 g71.92 x 150.57 x 7.95 mm
86091 mm³
6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
90 %
6.
87.9%
Apple iPhone 17
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19 ⎘
Apple A19 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon: List Price: 949 Euro177 g71.5 x 149.6 x 7.95 mm6.30"
2622x1206
460 PPI
OLED
91 %
7.
86.2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 1199€188 g75.2 x 166.7 x 6.5 mm
81483 mm³
6.90"
2520x1080
397 PPI
AMOLED
88.7 %
8.
86%
Google Pixel 10
Google Pixel 10
Google Tensor G5 ⎘
IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 999€204 g72 x 152.8 x 8.6 mm
63114 mm³
6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
86 %
9.
84%
Apple iPhone 17e
Apple iPhone 17e
Apple A19 ⎘
Apple A19 4-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon: List Price: 699 Euro170 g71.5 x 146.7 x 7.8 mm6.10"
2532x1170
460 PPI
OLED
87 %
10.
82.6%
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8450 ⎘
ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1
Amazon: List Price: 799€188 g72.42 x 151.21 x 8.13 mm
89029 mm³
6.32"
2640x1216
460 PPI
AMOLED
89 %

The table above is a list of the best compact smartphones tested by Notebookcheck in the last 18 months along with other models that are relevant and still available to buy. If multiple products have the same rating, the newer review is listed higher. Prices are updated daily and may change accordingly over time.
Link: all tested products in this class by volume or length

Editorial comment

As part of this quarter's update, we welcome the Galaxy S26, Pixel 10, iPhone 17e as well as the Reno15 Pro.

1st place - Apple iPhone 17 Pro

The iPhone 17 Pro is the best compact phone currently available
Apple iPhone 17 Pro

The iPhone 17 Pro comes with a variety of gen-to-gen improvements, scoring points with features such as its new, significantly brighter and more color-accurate OLED display, a larger and more enduring battery and the powerful A19 Pro chip with 12 GB of RAM. The latter ensure outstanding system performance; its battery life is great for the product category, too.

The iPhone 17 Pro is a powerful premium smartphone.

Its cameras have seen an improvement, too. In particular, the telephoto lens and the new "center stage" front camera are more versatile and deliver better quality in everyday life. Design-wise, the phone sports a sturdy, albeit more scratch-sensitive aluminum frame, and slim looks.

Wi-Fi 7, dual e-SIM and USB-C 3.2 are all onboard to round out the list of features nicely. No one is perfect; high-res Bluetooth codecs are missing and some new iOS 26 functionality is unavailable in the EU.

2nd place - Xiaomi 17

Xiaomi's 17 is one of the best compact phones currently available
Xiaomi 17

While the Xiaomi 17 does set new standards for compact smartphones with its huge 7,000 mAh battery and powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the model is not without its weaknesses. The enormous battery ensures runtimes better than most rival phones at the cost of the casing's weight and size, both on the larger side. So much so that the Xiaomi might be unsuitable for users who really want a slim phone and nothing else.

Xiaomi's 17 rocks thanks in no small part to its gigantic battery - that also makes it heavier.

Although the performance of the new Snapdragon chip is very good, thermals can get in the way. In particular, it's graphics performance that suffers when under longer loads. The 17's primary camera impresses with Leica optics and good low-light capabilities, even if shots can sometimes appears oversaturated and oversharpened in daylight. In addition, HyperOS 3 bears a lot of similarities to iOS, which may not appeal to every Android fan, and the Chinese-market version of the phone comes with limitations such as weaker software support and the lack of e-SIM.

All things considered, the Xiaomi 17 is a flawed option that is only available from overseas shops for customers in the EU, for example TradingShenzhen.

3rd place - Google Pixel 10 Pro

The Pixel 10 Pro is one of the best compact phones currently available
Google Pixel 10 Pro

The Pixel 10 Pro has a high-quality glass and aluminum casing with IP68 certification. Powering it is the Tensor G5 processor with 16 GB of RAM, which runs smoothly in everyday use but lags behind the competition in benchmarks. Its internal storage can be as big as 1 TB, but is slower than expected despite being UFS 4.0-compliant.

Google's Pixel 10 Pro combines high-quality design and s bright OLED display with strong features, but falls short of expectations in terms of performance, storage and GPS accuracy.

Its 6.3-inch LTPO OLED display with 2,856 × 1,280 pixels achieves peak brightness of up to 3,200 cd/m² and a 120-Hz refresh rate, but also flickers at a low frequency. Features include Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, UWB, NFC and dual-band GNSS. The latter is not very precise indoors, though.

The Pixel's 4,870-mAh battery can be charged at 30 W wired and 15 W wirelessly. The triple rear camera system with 50, 48 and 48 MP delivers impressive photos. The ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is quick and the vibration motor provides precise feedback.

4th place - Samsung Galaxy S26

The Galaxy S26 is a very good compact phone
Samsung Galaxy S26

The S26 is not as much about spectacular innovation as it is about technical refinement. At its heart is Samsung's new Exynos 2600 processor, manufactured using the most modern 2-nanometer process. In everyday use, the chip ensures high speed, short loading times and smooth multitasking. Under prolonged workloads, however, a familiar problem becomes apparent: Performance is noticeably throttled so as to lower temperatures.

The S26 is a consistently optimized premium smartphone - strong in detail, but lacking major innovative leaps.

There are improvements to highlight on the power front. Battery capacity has risen to 4,300 mAh, delivering visibly longer runtimes than its predecessor, though not record-breakingly so. The 6.3-inch AMOLED display is once again a big bright feather in the phone's cap, or it would be if it had one. It is extremely bright, high-contrast and color-accurate.

Specs-wise, Samsung keeps things conservative in many areas. Camera hardware and charging performance have only seen limited progress, and modern standards such as Bluetooth 6.0 and UWB are also missing. On the other hand, the product scores points with high build quality, Android 16 slash One UI 8.5, and an exceptionally long claimed software update period of seven years.

5th place - Vivo X300

The X300 is a very good compact phone
Vivo X300

The X300 is a compact upper-class smartphone with a high-quality casing and IP68/69 certification that remains pleasantly handy despite its 6.31-inch display diagonal. The star of this show, a 200-MP primary camera delivers excellent photos, including good-looking low-light shots, while the phone's telephoto and ultra-wide-angle cams are weaker, but still strong enough for this product class.

The Vivo X300 is a compact but fully-fledged flagship with an excellent 200-MP Zeiss camera.

Its LTPO AMOLED display with a high resolution, very high HDR peak brightness, 2,160-Hz PWM dimming and precise colors are among its strengths as well. A Dimensity 9500 ensures true flagship performance and very high GPU performance, but is loses steam in stress tests quickly due to throttling. A 5,360-mAh internal battery offers good but not outstanding runtimes and charges at up to 90 watts, with 40 watts being the limit for wireless charging.

With Wi-Fi 7, fast ultrasonic fingerprint scanner, OriginOS with long updates and many premium features, the X300 is a first-class compact flagship.

6th place - Apple iPhone 17

The iPhone 17 is a good compact phone
Apple iPhone 17

The iPhone 17 comes closer to the Pro models than ever before with its high-quality, largely familiar design, larger and significantly improved 6.3-inch ProMotion OLED panel (finally with 120 Hz), the powerful Apple A19 SoC and as much as 256 GB of storage in the base SKU.

The iPhone 17 is the iPhone to buy.

It offers powerful cameras with two 48-MP sensors and a new 18-MP selfie shooter, very high everyday and gaming performance, longer battery life and modern connectivity with the N1 radio chip and Wi-Fi 7. It has weaknesses. too such as its slow USB-C 2.0 port, limited Bluetooth audio codecs, Wi-Fi 7 implementation limited to 160-MHz channel width, a limited warranty (by the EU standards) of 12 months and fast charging that, at 40 watts, is clearly not as fast as some Android-based rivals.

7th place - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is a good compact phone
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is marketed as a high-quality foldable that has seen several gen-to-gen improvements. Thanks to Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a robust folding mechanism and IP48 certification, its casing is durable with a high-quality feel to it. With a 6.9-inch main OLED panel that is very bright and contrast-rich, as well as an upscale 4.1-inch external display, the product has no eye candy shortage and offers various usage options.

Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip7 is a high-quality flip smartphone with multi-year updates and good battery life. It loses some of its appeal due to limited outer display functions, slow charging and weaker performance.

The secondary panel is limited in its functionality and cannot fully replace the internal display. The update guarantee of seven years is long, the software is up-to-date with Android 16 and One UI 8, and the increased battery capacity of around 4,300 mAh delivers solid runtimes. Charging speeds aren't great, both wired and wirelessly, and neither is performance: in the EU, the smartphone comes with the Exynos 2500, which lags behind the Snapdragon version and noticeably throttles under load.

If you are interested in the cheaper entry-level model, the Galaxy Z Flip FE, you should also take a look at the Flip6 from the previous year, as the two devices are almost identical.

8th place - Google Pixel 10

The Pixel 10 is a good compact phone
Google Pixel 10

The Pixel 10 is an interesting Android smartphone, none the least because of its software. At its heart is Google's Tensor G5 chip, which enhances AI features such as Gemini, intelligent image processing and writing assistants. While the phone is fairly fast in everyday use, the Tensor lacks the efficiency and performance of top 2026 ARM chips, as especially noticeable under high continuous workloads.

Overall, the Pixel 10 is great, and it can also be had at a significantly lower price now. Raw hardware performance is not the priority here.

In terms of technology, the compact 6.3-inch device scores points with a very bright OLED display, lovely build quality, and IP68 certification. However, modern extras such as LTPO technology, Wi-Fi 7 or UWB did not make the cut. Wireless charging is supported, but only at a rather slow rate. Just like with previous Pixels, its rear camera setup continues to deliver strong everyday photos with typical Pixel image processing, although the primary and ultra-wide-angle cameras have been visibly slimmed down compared to the Pro models. Also worth a mention is the long software support of 7 years.

9th place - Apple iPhone 17e

The iPhone 17e is a good compact phone
Apple iPhone 17e

The iPhone 17e shows how consistent Apple is with its more affordable model range. While the 17e does make use of the latest Apple SoC, it deliberately forgoes numerous premium functions. Powered by the A19 chip, it delivers great performance in everyday use and handles even demanding apps with ease while remaining energy-efficient and offering solid battery life.

The iPhone 17e therefore looks like a deliberately slimmed-down, entry-level iPhone, modern enough from a technical perspective to last many years, but clearly differentiated from the more expensive models.

The list of cost-cutting measures is neither short, nor easy to miss. Apple has eliminated 120-Hz ProMotion display refresh rate, a telephoto lens, MagSafe support, Wi-Fi 7 and some AI features as found on the more expensive models. The 17e's OLED display operates at 60 Hz, but thankfully still impresses with its high brightness and precise colors. Its single rear camera delivers surprisingly strong photos thanks to Apple's image processing, but reaches its limits quicker than Pro models when it comes to zoom and night shots. Build quality is high, software updates are set to come for many years, and all the benefits of Apple's extensive and tightly integrated ecosystem come included.

10th place - Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G

The Reno15 Pro 5G is a good compact phone
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G

The Reno15 Pro 5G has plenty multimedia prowess, and endurance. Powering it is a large 6,500-mAh battery enabling very long runtimes in everyday use and making the product one of the longest-lasting smartphones in its class. Charging can be as fast as 80 watts, but there is no wireless charging support.

The Reno15 Pro 5G is a strong mid-range smartphone with a focus on battery life, display quality and balanced everyday performance.

Its 6.83-inch AMOLED display is impressive with its high brightness, 120-Hz refresh rate and vibrant colors. Build quality left us impressed, despite how comparatively slim the phone's casing is.

A MediaTek Dimensity 8450 delivers smooth performance in everyday use, but cannot keep up with higher-end chips. The Oppo's triple rear camera delivers good daylight shots and solid zoom results, but dynamics and details at night are poor. Other aspects unlikely to make customers happy are the slow USB 2.0 port, and some of the pre-installed apps.

Best pocket-friendly smartphones: Overview

Size comparison

166.7 mm / 6.56 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 188 g0.4145 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 207 g0.4564 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 204 g0.4497 lbs151.21 mm / 5.95 in 72.42 mm / 2.85 in 8.13 mm / 0.3201 in 188 g0.4145 lbs151.1 mm / 5.95 in 71.8 mm / 2.83 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 191 g0.4211 lbs150 mm / 5.91 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 206 g0.4542 lbs150.57 mm / 5.93 in 71.92 mm / 2.83 in 7.95 mm / 0.313 in 190 g0.4189 lbs149.6 mm / 5.89 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 7.95 mm / 0.313 in 177 g0.3902 lbs149.6 mm / 5.89 in 71.7 mm / 2.82 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 167 g0.3682 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 170 g0.3748 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Measurements

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Display
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)
3044
3199
2645
2386
2635
1154
1297
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)
2997
3207
2730
4072
2431
1692
1203
1967
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
1.13 ?(0.53, 0.602)
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
1.31 ?(0.513, 0.8015)
0.62 ?(0.3275, 0.296)
0.75 ?(0.384, 0.3635)
3.1 ?(0.1, 3)
0.64 ?(0.347, 0.2975)
0.89 ?(0.45, 0.44)
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
1.05 ?(0.4535, 0.5935)
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
1.04 ?(0.476, 0.56)
0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3)
1.04 ?(0.505, 0.5395)
1.32 ?(0.6345, 0.6865)
0.77 ?(0.4105, 0.3565)
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
1.05 ?(0.57, 0.4795)
11.2 ?(9.2, 2)
3.4 ?(1.7, 1.7)
1 ?(0.4905, 0.5105)
PWM Frequency (Hz)
240
120
240
240
360
241
240
240.66
60
90
PWM Amplitude * (%)
14.89
18
17.24
13.6
12.85
15
13.64
83.3
14
17.24
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1059
1030
2161
1341
1537
1138
1349
1850
837
1281
Brightness (cd/m²)
1060
1021
2198
1337
1523
1127
1354
1754
835
1280
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
98
94
96
96
96
98
86
99
98
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.44
0.7
2.4
1.4
1.07
2.2
1.96
1.23
1
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
3.68
1.8
4
2.6
2.99
3.3
4.25
2.67
2.9
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.5
0.8
1.9
2.1
1.8
1.6
3
2
1.3
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.274 97%
2.19 100%
2.06 107%
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.06 107%
2.2 100%
2.246 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
6542 99%
6868 95%
6646 98%
6497 100%
6754 96%
6516 100%
6484 100%
6898 94%
6486 100%
6330 103%
Heat
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
41.2
48.7
41.2
45.5
46.6
43
51.5
40.6
40.2
45.1
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
40.8
50.1
39.7
43.9
45.8
45.3
49.7
39.8
42.1
44.5
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
27.5
24.8
27.1
25.2
28.9
28.1
25.8
30.6
25.3
27.7
Idle Bottom * (°C)
26.9
25
26.1
25.2
27.1
28.5
25.3
30.4
26.2
26.4
Battery runtime
Reader / Idle (h)
65.9
72.7
33.1
51
66.7
29
WiFi v1.3 (h)
24.2
30.9
21.1
17.7
19.6
20.1
18.9
17.9
19.4
23.5
Load (h)
5.4
4.3
3.3
3.2
4.4
3.5

* ... smaller is better

Benchmark scores

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3803 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3662 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2308 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3397 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
3732 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2478 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2319 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
3538 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1566 Points
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
10097 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10842 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6314 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10388 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9998 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
9456 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8098 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5815 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
9036 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6137 Points
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
26286 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25598 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13193 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26692 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
26476 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
21785 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20027 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12687 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
17472 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13159 Points
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
6001 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6311 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3281 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7122 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7089 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
5022 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5166 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3188 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
3838 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4044 Points
Solar Bay Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
11442 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12146 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13651 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
10197 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11178 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
7942 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6557 Points
Steel Nomad Light Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2698 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2566 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1014 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3211 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3145 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
2197 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2294 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1017 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1742 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1423 Points
GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
253 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
281 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
361 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
202.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
189 fps
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
124 fps
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
166 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
87 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
108 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
146 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
69.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87 fps
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps
PCMark for Android - Work 3.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
19432 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15738 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19914 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16614 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18441 Points
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2356 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2257 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1708 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
805 Points
Productivity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2012 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1806 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1370 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
596 Points
Creativity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1806 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2056 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1136 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
648 Points
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9768 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5833 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11222 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3811 Points
Antutu v11 - Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2413726 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3296169 Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3540306 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
2030480 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2125570 Points
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
469.169 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274.298 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
267.654 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
467.799 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209.864 Points
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
281.958 Points
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
432.57 Points
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151.377 Points
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3943.44 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1492.74 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3923.49 MB/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2056.87 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4044.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1762.72 MB/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1748.66 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3784.97 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1353.55 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2718.09 MB/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1997.76 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2981.82 MB/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1660.39 MB/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1701.38 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
487.69 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264.44 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
418.42 MB/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
332.61 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
366.98 MB/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
281.71 MB/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237.39 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
643.31 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
347.84 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
124.05 MB/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
654.09 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
421.08 MB/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.58 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
824 (780min - 864max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
916 (903min - 923max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
844 (789min - 858max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1592 (1420min, 1437.98P1 - 1631max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
799 (780min - 816max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
772 (707min - 820max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
663 (621min - 708max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
834 (647min - 963max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
928 (844min - 962max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
900 (446min - 952max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
777 (620min, 623.19P1 - 1073max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
868 (438min - 950max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
777 (371min - 822max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17e
A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
530 (479min - 603max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1667 (1563min - 1686max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1086 (1009min, 1009.29P1 - 1197max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1571 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1334 (695min - 1394max) MBit/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1843 (1759min - 1875max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1020 (745min, 765.88P1 - 1165max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
808 (405min - 819max) MBit/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1449 (1308min - 1704max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1216 (1179min - 1261max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1262 (1051min, 1068.98P1 - 1324max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1742 (1566min - 1859max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1245 (1159min - 1257max) MBit/s
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1802 (1718min - 1822max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1658 (1579min, 1592.34P1 - 1684max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
739 (662min - 799max) MBit/s
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1547 (1261min - 1607max) MBit/s
PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
57.3 (45min, 52.65P1 - 59max) fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.6 (12min, 35.04P1 - 42max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S26
Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.1 (78min, 80.66P1 - 91max) fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
57.7 (46min - 60max) fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 10
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.7 (24min - 41max) fps
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8450, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.5 (53min, 55P1 - 61max) fps
Read all 15 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-07- 4 (Update: 2026-07-11)