Notebookcheck Logo
Best smartphones of the smaller kind tested and rated by Notebookcheck
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt

Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck

Q4 2025 update.

Smartphones with large displays are omnipresent now. Ubiquitous. It's small phones that are hard to find, which is why we came up with a list of the most compact smartphones currently available on the market that have been extensively tested by Notebookcheck and got a good to very good rating.
Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL) Published 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...
Smartphone Apple Android Charts

Just what is a compact smartphone? This is a question that different consumers might have a different answer to. The width/length of the casing as well as the display diagonal are the most obvious criteria but with display edges becoming ever narrower, the phone's display-to-surface ratio is certainly an important factor, too. Foldables bring another level of complexity into the picture. Although these are rather narrow (or short) when folded, they are considerably thicker than regular phones, to.

We decided to use smartphones' volume as the main criteria. To make the list, a smartphone can't have a volume large than 88,000 mm³ or a length of over 156 mm. Below are the best phones that meet the requirements and were reviewed by us over the last 18 months (full reviews are linked in the table).

Best smartphones of the smaller kind to buy in Q1 2026

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Dimensions
Display
Screen / Body
1.
89.9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. 
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone...
2. 
Apple iPhone 17 Pro TechWove...
3. 
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1549€
206 g71.9 x 150 x 8.8 mm
94908 mm³
6.30"
2622x1206
458 PPI
OLED
90 %
2.
89.2%
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen...
2. 
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen...
3. 
XIAOMI OpenWear Stereo Hi-Re...
List Price: 650€
191 g71.8 x 151.1 x 8.1 mm
87877 mm³
6.30"
2656x1220
464 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
89.5 %
3.
88.9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5 ⎘
IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1199€
207 g72 x 152.8 x 8.6 mm
94614 mm³
6.30"
2856x1280
497 PPI
OLED
87 %
4.
88.9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 512...
2. 
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Cell P...
3. 
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
List Price: 899€
162 g70.5 x 146.9 x 7.2 mm
74566 mm³
6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
AMOLED
91.1 %
5.
87.9%
Apple iPhone 17
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19 ⎘
Apple A19 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. 
Apple iPhone 17 Pro TechWove...
2. 
iPhone 17 Pro Max Deep Blue ...
3. 
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili...
List Price: 949 Euro
177 g71.5 x 149.6 x 7.95 mm6.30"
2622x1206
460 PPI
OLED
91 %
6.
86.2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1199€
188 g75.2 x 166.7 x 6.5 mm
81483 mm³
6.90"
2520x1080
397 PPI
AMOLED
88.7 %
7.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. 
Google Pixel 9a with Gemini ...
3. 
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
List Price: 899€
198 g72 x 152.8 x 8.5 mm
93514 mm³
6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
87 %
8.
84.8%
Vivo X200 FE
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. 
Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl...
3. 
BoxWave Screen Protector Com...
List Price: 799€
186 g71.76 x 150.83 x 7.99 mm
86480 mm³
6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
90 %
9.
84.1%
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18 ⎘
Apple A18 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. 
Apple iPhone 16e Silicone Ca...
2. 
Apple iPhone 16e Silicone Ca...
3. 
iPhone 16e / 256GB / Black (...
List Price: 699 Euro
167 g71.5 x 146.7 x 7.8 mm
81815 mm³
6.10"
2532x1170
460 PPI
OLED
87 %
10.
81%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. 
Ferilinso 3 Pack Screen Prot...
3. 
3 Pack Screen Protector for ...
List Price: 549€
185.9 g73.3 x 154.7 x 8.9 mm
100922 mm³
6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
pOLED
84 %

The table above is an overview of the best compact smartphones tested by Notebookcheck in the last 18 months along with other models that are relevant and still available to buy. If multiple products have the same rating, the newer review is listed higher. Prices are updated daily and may change accordingly over time.
Link: all tested products in this class by volume or length

Editorial comment

As newly tested smartphones replace their predecessors, the iPhone 17 Pro takes the top spot.

If you prefer larger displays but still want a light and slim smartphone, the iPhone Air and the Galaxy S25 Edge are worth taking a closer look. Another hot candidate for this Top 10 list is Vivo's X300.

1st place - Apple iPhone 17 Pro

The iPhone 17 Pro is the best compact phone currently available
Apple iPhone 17 Pro

The iPhone 17 Pro comes with a variety of gen-to-gen improvements, scoring points with features such as its new, significantly brighter and more color-accurate OLED display, a larger and more enduring battery and the powerful A19 Pro chip with 12 GB of RAM. The latter ensure outstanding system performance; its battery life is great for the product category, too.

The iPhone 17 Pro is a powerful premium smartphone.

Its cameras have seen an improvement, too. In particular, the telephoto lens and the new "center stage" front camera are more versatile and deliver better quality in everyday life. Design-wise, the phone sports a sturdy, albeit more scratch-sensitive aluminum frame, and slim looks.

Wi-Fi 7, dual e-SIM and USB-C 3.2 are all onboard to round out the list of features nicely. No one is perfect; high-res Bluetooth codecs are missing and some new iOS 26 functionality is unavailable in the EU.

2nd place - Xiaomi 17

Xiaomi's 17 is one of the best compact phones currently available
Xiaomi 17

While the Xiaomi 17 does set new standards for compact smartphones with its huge 7,000 mAh battery and powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the model is not without its weaknesses. The enormous battery ensures runtimes better than most rival phones at the cost of the casing's weight and size, both on the larger side. So much so that the Xiaomi might be unsuitable for users who really want a slim phone and nothing else.

Xiaomi's 17 rocks thanks in no small part to its gigantic battery - that also makes it heavier.

Although the performance of the new Snapdragon chip is very good, thermals can get in the way. In particular, it's graphics performance that suffers when under longer loads. The 17's primary camera impresses with Leica optics and good low-light capabilities, even if shots can sometimes appears oversaturated and oversharpened in daylight. In addition, HyperOS 3 bears a lot of similarities to iOS, which may not appeal to every Android fan, and the Chinese-market version of the phone comes with limitations such as weaker software support and the lack of e-SIM.

All things considered, the Xiaomi 17 is a flawed option that is only available from overseas shops for customers in the EU, for example TradingShenzhen.

3rd place - Google Pixel 10 Pro

The Pixel 10 Pro is one of the best compact phones currently available
Google Pixel 10 Pro

The Pixel 10 Pro has a high-quality glass and aluminum casing with IP68 certification. Powering it is the Tensor G5 processor with 16 GB of RAM, which runs smoothly in everyday use but lags behind the competition in benchmarks. Its internal storage can be as big as 1 TB, but is slower than expected despite being UFS 4.0-compliant.

Google's Pixel 10 Pro combines high-quality design and s bright OLED display with strong features, but falls short of expectations in terms of performance, storage and GPS accuracy.

Its 6.3-inch LTPO OLED display with 2,856 × 1,280 pixels achieves peak brightness of up to 3,200 cd/m² and a 120-Hz refresh rate, but also flickers at a low frequency. Features include Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, UWB, NFC and dual-band GNSS. The latter is not very precise indoors, though.

The Pixel's 4,870-mAh battery can be charged at 30 W wired and 15 W wirelessly. The triple rear camera system with 50, 48 and 48 MP delivers impressive photos. The ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is quick and the vibration motor provides precise feedback.

4th place - Samsung Galaxy S25

The Galaxy S25 is one of the best compact phones currently available
Samsung Galaxy S25

The Galaxy S25 is a compact flagship smartphone with a screen size of 6.2 inches. It is equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, which promises a significant increase in performance compared to the previous model. The device offers 12 GB of RAM and is available in storage variants of 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB.

Its AMOLED display sports an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and offers a Full HD+ resolution. The rear camera is comprised of a primary sensor with optical image stabilization, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera and a telephoto lens with triple optical zoom.

The Galaxy S25 is a powerful flagship smartphone with modern AI functions and is even more compact than its predecessor.

The 4,000-mAh battery supports wired charging at 25 watts as well as wireless charging via Fast Wireless Charging 2.0. The device is IP68-certified, which offers protection against water and dust. Despite its exquisite features, the Galaxy remains light and compact with a weight of 162 grams. The S25 also offers advanced AI features, including the Google Gemini Assistant.

5th place - Apple iPhone 17

The iPhone 17 is a very good compact phone
Apple iPhone 17

The iPhone 17 comes closer to the Pro models than ever before with its high-quality, largely familiar design, larger and significantly improved 6.3-inch ProMotion OLED panel (finally with 120 Hz), the powerful Apple A19 SoC and as much as 256 GB of storage in the base SKU.

The iPhone 17 is the iPhone to buy.

It offers powerful cameras with two 48-MP sensors and a new 18-MP selfie shooter, very high everyday and gaming performance, longer battery life and modern connectivity with the N1 radio chip and Wi-Fi 7. It has weaknesses. too such as its slow USB-C 2.0 port, limited Bluetooth audio codecs, Wi-Fi 7 implementation limited to 160-MHz channel width, a limited warranty (by the EU standards) of 12 months and fast charging that, at 40 watts, is clearly not as fast as some Android-based rivals.

6th place - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is a very good compact phone
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is marketed as a high-quality foldable that has been improved in several ways. Thanks to Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a robust folding mechanism and IP48 certification, the casing is durable with a high-quality feel to it. With a 6.9-inch main OLED panel that is very bright and contrast-rich, as well as an upscale 4.1-inch external display, the product has no eye candy shortage and offers various usage options.

Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip7 is a high-quality flip smartphone with multi-year updates and good battery life. It loses some of its appeal due to limited outer display functions, slow charging and weaker performance.

The secondary panel is limited in its functionality and cannot fully replace the internal display. The update guarantee of seven years is long, the software is up-to-date with Android 16 and One UI 8, and the increased battery capacity of around 4,300 mAh delivers solid runtimes. Charging speeds aren't great, both wired and wirelessly, and neither is performance: in the EU, the smartphone comes with the Exynos 2500, which lags behind the Snapdragon version and noticeably throttles under load.

If you are interested in the cheaper entry-level model, the Galaxy Z Flip FE, you should also take a look at the Flip6 from the previous year, as the two devices are almost identical.

7th place - Google Pixel 9

The Pixel 9 is a decent compact phone
Google Pixel 9

The Pixel 9 has a very bright 6.3-inch OLED display with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. A dual camera system on its back takes beautiful photos, but has no optical zoom.

The Pixel 9 offers a compact form factor and seven years of updates, among other benefits.

Further features are Wi-Fi 7 and 5G support - lots of bands, USB-C 3.2, wireless charging and IP68 certification.

Its SoC is very slow for a high-end product, and charging speeds leave a lot to be desired.

8th place - Vivo X200 FE

The X200 FE is a decent compact phone
Vivo X200 FE

The X200 FE is a compact premium smartphone that impresses with its high-quality casing, IP68/IP69 certification and a very bright 6.31-inch LTPO OLED display. Thanks to the large battery, it offers excellent battery life, while naturally supporting fast charging and delivering strong performance with the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, despite some noticeable throttling under longer loads.

Vivo's X200 FE impresses with a strong display, long battery life and a good main camera sensor, but falls short when it comes to USB speeds, secondary cameras and performance sustainability.

The primary Zeiss-branded lens takes very good pictures, especially in daylight, while the ultra-wide-angle and telephoto cameras are less impressive due to having no image stabilization. Multiple modern standards such as Wi-Fi 7 are onboard, but the USB-C port is limited to 2.0 speeds.

9th place - Apple iPhone 16e

The iPhone 16e is a decent compact phone
Apple iPhone 16e

The iPhone 16e is Apple's most affordable model, as of January 2026. Equipped with the powerful A18 chip, a 6.1-inch OLED display (60 Hz) and a 48-MP main camera, it is aimed at users who are looking for an up-to-date iPhone without paying extra for premium features. Its visual design is reminiscent of the iPhone 14, with a high-quality finish, compact size and limited weight. Features such as Dynamic Island, MagSafe, UWB or additional camera lenses are missing.

The iPhone 16e is a well-balanced offer with strong performance and long battery life, but with clear compromises in terms of features and display technology.

Its sole rear camera sensor delivers very good results in daylight, but can not do ultra-wide-angle, macro or cinema shots. The OLED display impresses with high brightness and color accuracy, its low refresh rate being the main downside. The 4,005-mAh internal battery ensures long runtimes, outperforming the regular iPhone 16.

The Apple smartphone's strengths also include 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3 and precise GPS. Apple Intelligence is supported, and software updates should be made available for at least 6 years.

10th place - Google Pixel 9a

The Pixel 9a is a decent compact phone
Google Pixel 9a

The Pixel 9a aspires to be a strong mid-range smartphone with excellent battery life and a sophisticated design. Its 6.3-inch POLED display offers a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and high brightness of up to 2,700 cd/m². With its impressive color fidelity, it's a real treat for the eyes.

In charge of its performance is the Google Tensor G4, 8 GB of RAM and either 128 GB or 256 GB of UFS 3.1 storage. In everyday use, the device performs well, even if graphics-heavy tasks can be a bit of an issue. The battery with 5,100 mAh enables exceptional runtimes.

The Pixel 9a is a balanced product offering strong battery life, a high-quality display, good cameras and long-term update security.

The camera system impresses with a 48-MP main sensor and 13-MP ultra-wide-angle lens, delivering detailed photos including macro and night shots. Selfies are all right, but are not flagship-grade. IP68 protection, wireless charging, e-SIM support and seven years of software updates come included. On the other hand, storage is not expandable here, charging times are relatively long and GNSS does not function great indoors.

Best pocket-friendly smartphones: Overview

Size comparison

166.7 mm / 6.56 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 188 g0.4145 lbs154.7 mm / 6.09 in 73.3 mm / 2.89 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 185.9 g0.4098 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 207 g0.4564 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 198 g0.4365 lbs151.1 mm / 5.95 in 71.8 mm / 2.83 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 191 g0.4211 lbs150.83 mm / 5.94 in 71.76 mm / 2.83 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 186 g0.4101 lbs150 mm / 5.91 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 206 g0.4542 lbs149.6 mm / 5.89 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 7.95 mm / 0.313 in 177 g0.3902 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 167 g0.3682 lbs146.9 mm / 5.78 in 70.5 mm / 2.78 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 162 g0.3571 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Measurements

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
1.13 ?(0.53, 0.602)
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
1.31 ?(0.513, 0.8015)
2.64 ?(1.538, 1.103)
3.1 ?(0.1, 3)
0.64 ?(0.347, 0.2975)
1.55 ?(0.9135, 0.6375)
1.51 ?(0.7815, 0.7275)
17.14 ?(0.4675, 16.67)
0.93 ?(0.4575, 0.474)
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
1.04 ?(0.476, 0.56)
0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3)
1.04 ?(0.505, 0.5395)
1.62 ?(0.8925, 0.729)
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
1.05 ?(0.57, 0.4795)
1.04 ?(0.5335, 0.502)
1.35 ?(0.7575, 0.5955)
2.26 ?(1.058, 1.205)
0.81 ?(0.4405, 0.367)
PWM Frequency (Hz)
240
120
240
240
241
240
120
360
60
240
PWM Amplitude * (%)
14.89
18
17.24
13.54
15
13.64
22.22
16.22
15
12.82
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1059
1030
2161
1301
1138
1349
2063
1797
833
1978
Brightness (cd/m²)
1060
1021
2198
1311
1127
1354
1914
1802
837
1775
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
98
94
98
96
98
84
99
99
76
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.44
0.7
3.1
1.07
2.2
0.7
1
0.7
1.1
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
3.68
1.8
4.4
2.99
3.3
2.2
1.9
1.6
3
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.5
0.8
2.3
1.8
1.6
1.2
1.6
0.6
2.2
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.274 97%
2.19 100%
2.01 109%
2.22 99%
2.06 107%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
6542 99%
6868 95%
6646 98%
6454 101%
6516 100%
6484 100%
6524 100%
6668 97%
6525 100%
6622 98%
Heat
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
41.2
48.7
41.2
41.7
43
51.5
43.2
47.5
43.1
43
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
40.8
50.1
39.7
43.3
45.3
49.7
41.3
46.9
43.2
43.4
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
27.5
24.8
27.1
26.9
28.1
25.8
27
28.6
30.1
31.2
Idle Bottom * (°C)
26.9
25
26.1
27
28.5
25.3
25.5
27.5
28.9
29
Battery runtime
Reader / Idle (h)
65.9
72.7
33.1
45.2
66.7
35
47.4
44.8
WiFi v1.3 (h)
24.2
30.9
21.1
18
20.1
18.9
16.5
22.6
23.2
21.2
Load (h)
5.4
4.3
3.3
3
4.4
3.9
4.1
4

* ... smaller is better

Benchmark scores

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3803 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3662 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2308 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3087 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
3732 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2478 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1798 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2234 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3338 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
10097 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10842 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6314 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9776 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
9456 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8098 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4501 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7198 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
8044 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4453 Points
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
26286 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25598 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13193 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
21785 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20027 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12322 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
14024 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
6001 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6311 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3281 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
5022 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5166 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3465 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3330 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2615 Points
Solar Bay Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
11442 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12146 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11765 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
10197 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11178 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5998 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
6120 Points
Steel Nomad Light Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2698 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2566 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1014 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
2197 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2294 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1323 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1517 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1055 Points
GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
253 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
281 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
202.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
189 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
140 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
87 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
108 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
69.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
50 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.2 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
19432 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15738 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20623 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13948 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14377 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11398 Points
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2356 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
951 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Productivity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2012 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1008 Points
Creativity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1806 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
955 Points
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9768 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
804 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2806319 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2545132 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1338955 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1975467 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
2158729 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1716184 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1022007 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1404873 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1432050 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844082 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
119218 Points
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50987 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84055 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95809 Points
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
110696 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65875 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56737 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49231 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
97104 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52224 Points
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3943.44 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1492.74 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3982.43 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4044.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1584.56 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1867.08 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1688.82 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3784.97 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1353.55 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2256.71 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2981.82 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256.48 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1756.13 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
853.5 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
487.69 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264.44 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299.89 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
366.98 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226.41 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
300.78 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241.03 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
643.31 MB/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
347.84 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.76 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
266.19 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
357.33 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
261.8 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
824 (780min - 864max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
916 (903min - 923max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1167 (1006min - 1197max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1592 (1420min, 1437.98P1 - 1631max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
799 (780min - 816max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
911 (857min - 930max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (552min - 950max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
727 (715min - 739max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
920 (458min - 947max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
807 (348min - 873max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
834 (647min - 963max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
928 (844min - 962max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1058 (518min - 1295max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
777 (620min, 623.19P1 - 1073max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
868 (438min - 950max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
955 (739min - 994max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
880 (537min - 977max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
765 (732min - 797max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1667 (1563min - 1686max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1086 (1009min, 1009.29P1 - 1197max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1571 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1210 (998min - 1383max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1020 (745min, 765.88P1 - 1165max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 (1826min - 1894max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1686 (837min - 1911max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (731min - 867max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1216 (1179min - 1261max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1262 (1051min, 1068.98P1 - 1324max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1742 (1566min - 1859max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1201 (1184min - 1221max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
1658 (1579min, 1592.34P1 - 1684max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1851 (886min - 1889max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1820 (928min - 1882max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (789min - 843max) MBit/s
PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
57.3 (45min, 52.65P1 - 59max) fps
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.6 (12min, 35.04P1 - 42max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 17
A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe
57.7 (46min - 60max) fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.8 (41min - 61max) fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 (45min - 60max) fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 (39min - 60max) fps
Read all 15 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-02-12 (Update: 2026-02-12)