Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs AMD A6-3420M

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9400 but features a slower clocked front side bus.

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9300 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.

The T9300 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

AMD A6-3420M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-3420M

The AMD A6-3420M (Codename Llano) is a quad-core processor for entry level laptops. It is part of the Fusion family of APUs (=Accelerated Processing Units) and features an integrated Radeon HD 6520G graphics card. The processor core is clocked at 1.4 GHz base clock speed and is able to automatically overclock up to 2.4 GHz (TurboCore, depending on temperature and used cores). Compared to the A6-3410MX, the A6-3420M offers a lower base speed but a higher turbo core speed and a lower TDP rating.

The processor core is based on the Husky familiy 12h. Compared to the older Phenom II mobile processors, the Husky core is very similar but features an additional hardware divider. However, the performance per clock should be similar to the old Turion II, Athlon II, Phenom II mobile processors (as the Llano APU they did not feature a Level 3 cache).

The performance of the processor part depends on the used cores. Due to Turbo Core, a single core can be clocked up to 2.3 GHz leading to a performance of a AMD Turion II P540 (2.4 GHz 2MB L2 Cache). Using all four cores, the performance is in the range of the Phenom II X4 P920 (1.6 GHz 2MB L2 Cache). Therefore, on average a Penryn based Pentium T4500 should be comparable.

The Llano APUs feature an integrated DirectX 11 capable graphics card with a maximum of 400 cores. The AMD Radeon HD 6520G called version in the A6-Series however offers only 320 cores at 400MHz. It has no dedicated memory and also is not able to use the integrated cache (in difference to the Intel HD 3000). Furthermore the APU also features an integrated UVD3 video processor to fully decode most used HD videos (like H.264, VC-1, MPEG4).

The A6-3420M also features an integrated dual-channel memory controller with support for DDR3(L)-1333 memory and a PCIe 2.0 controller.

The TDP of 35 Watt for the APU (including graphics card and memory controller) makes it best suited for 14 to 15-inch laptops.

Beware: Parts of the information above is still based on rumors and leaks.
Sources: NGOHQ: Leaked Llano PresentationDonanimhaber: Llano Mobile Lineupc't: 12h Architecturetweakers: SuperPiAMD: leakted GPU Benchmarks (removed)pro-clockers: Llano GPU SpecificationsWikipedia: Fusion

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9300AMD A6-3420M
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD A-Series
CodenamePenrynLlano
Series: A-Series Llano
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 « 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A8-3550MX compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3530MX compare1.9 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3510MX compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3430MX compare1.7 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3520M compare1.6 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3410MX compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3500M compare1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3420M « 1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3400M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-3330MX compare2.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3310MX compare2.1 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3320M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3300M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3305M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 MHz1500 - 2400 MHz
FSB800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million1000 Million
Technology45 nm, 1-1.25V32 nm
Die Size107 mm2218 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.93     avg: 1.9     median: 2 (3%)     max: 1.96 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (17%)     max: 3009 Points
min: 1606     avg: 1658     median: 1673 (10%)     max: 1695 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (4%)     max: 5854 Points
min: 5369     avg: 5393     median: 5399 (4%)     max: 5411 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6952     avg: 6970     median: 6964 (5%)     max: 6995 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2098     avg: 2150     median: 2152 (3%)     max: 2199 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.6 s (6%)
min: 22.22     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (5%)     max: 25.05 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 706     avg: 741     median: 740.5 (9%)     max: 775 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1432 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
59.7 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.3 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
min: 2286     avg: 2305     median: 2305 (5%)     max: 2323 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
71.4 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1173 s (5%)
min: 1662     avg: 2217     median: 2217 (10%)     max: 2772 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23021 MIPS (11%)
11130 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
9250 MFLOPS (7%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (12%)     max: 6890 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (4%)     max: 4916 Points
min: 5159     avg: 5260     median: 5231 (5%)     max: 5419 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2284     avg: 2373     median: 2346.5 (6%)     max: 2514 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-3420M → 87% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 03. 06:40:05

#0 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2863 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 377 +0.058s ... 0.103s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2863 +0.003s ... 0.107s

#9 got single benchmarks 2863 +0.017s ... 0.124s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.105s ... 0.229s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.252s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)