The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 103%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 104%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 09. 21:11:47
#0 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:40:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 407 +0.025s ... 0.051s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.052s
#10 got single benchmarks 164 +0.031s ... 0.083s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.085s
#12 got single benchmarks 322 +0.083s ... 0.168s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.168s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.227s