Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Intel Core i7-1270P vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1270P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1270P

The Intel Core i7-1270P is a higher-end Alder Lake-P family CPU, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line 1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz for the efficient cluster. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management). Its shortcomings as compared with the mighty i7-1280P include the smaller L3 cache, lower core count, lower clock speeds; the performance is slated to be significantly lower as a result.

A brief look at the specifications instantly reveals this i7 series chip to be very similar to the Core i5-12600H, a more power-hungry processor targeted at gaming laptops.

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Intel Core i7-1270P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200. Intel suggests using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1270P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The 12 CPU cores are not just able to outshine any outgoing quad-core Tiger Lake part, the i7-1195G7 included. The average 1270P in our database directly competes with the Ryzen 7 5825U, the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U, meaning this little Core i7 is fast enough to make most consumers happy as of mid 2023.

The fairly high processing power comes at a cost. A single Golden Cove core can consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. Your mileage may thus vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.40 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like an i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU. We expect the gaming performance to be reasonably close to that of NVIDIA's MX350.

In other words, the Xe is good enough for most games at 1080p resolution / Medium settings, provided the Power Limits are high enough and the cooling solution is competent enough. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). As for the "Minimum Assured" power consumption, Intel's guidelines mention 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for such a chip.

The CPU is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. It's still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. A couple of the higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are not nearly as power-hungry while delivering similar or higher performance levels.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Intel Core i7-1270PQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
CodenameOryonAlder Lake-POryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Alder Lake-PQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P « 1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock <=3400 MHz1600 - 4800 MHz <=2980 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB1.1 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache6 MB18 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 168 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP35 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1270P
34.6 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
96 Points (54%)
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
min: 8426     avg: 9718     median: 9718 (9%)     max: 11010 Points
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
min: 1552     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (68%)     max: 1688 Points
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (41%)     max: 978 Points
min: 595     avg: 611     median: 611 (67%)     max: 627 Points
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (39%)     max: 366 Points
min: 3167     avg: 3536     median: 3536 (9%)     max: 3905 Points
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
min: 1695     avg: 1739     median: 1739 (11%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
min: 226     avg: 229.5     median: 229.5 (64%)     max: 233 Points
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (51%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (65%)
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7886 Points (48%)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36271 Points (26%)
14395 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
344.6 s (4%)
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.8 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16497 Points (26%)
9297 Points (15%)
min: 38099     avg: 38274     median: 38274 (22%)     max: 38449 MIPS
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
min: 4874     avg: 5279     median: 5279 (62%)     max: 5684 MIPS
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
min: 9.56     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 11.3 fps
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 635     median: 652 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
714 Seconds (9%)
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
min: 372     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 375 Seconds
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
min: 0.4926     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.575 sec
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
436.4 s (2%)
995 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10083     avg: 13706     median: 14374 (35%)     max: 14969 Points
min: 10981     avg: 12323     median: 12323 (30%)     max: 13665 Points
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
min: 9451     avg: 9958     median: 9958 (25%)     max: 10465 Points
min: 18221     avg: 18284     median: 18283.5 (33%)     max: 18346 Points
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
min: 5316     avg: 6022     median: 6021.5 (25%)     max: 6727 Points
5659 Points (24%)
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576     avg: 1679     median: 1666.5 (65%)     max: 1805 Points
min: 1564     avg: 1644     median: 1644 (64%)     max: 1724 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6244     avg: 9624     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 14043 Points
min: 8610     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (16%)     max: 8710 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1683 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8537 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 450.7     avg: 459.1     median: 454.2 (1%)     max: 482.4 ms
min: 537     avg: 541     median: 540.5 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 79579     avg: 80168     median: 80003 (60%)     max: 81088 Points
78273 Points (59%)
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (51%)     max: 70419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 284.8     median: 285.5 (78%)     max: 297 Points
251 Points (69%)
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 395     avg: 413.4     median: 419 (75%)     max: 423 Points
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (51%)     max: 291 Points
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
min: 1585     avg: 1649     median: 1648.5 (62%)     max: 1712 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 44.4     median: 45.4 (8%)     max: 52.6 Watt
min: 47.3     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 59.1 Watt
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 63     avg: 64.2     median: 64.2 (12%)     max: 65.3 Watt
min: 61.3     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (12%)     max: 64.9 Watt
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
4 Watt (3%)
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
4.6 Watt (5%)
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
34.9 Points per Watt (26%)
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 27.7 Points per Watt
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1270P → 106% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 82% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 17. 12:00:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14062 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752746438s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.009s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14062 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 14062 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.005s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.089s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)