Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Intel Core i7-1260P

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1260P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1260P

The Intel Core i7-1260P is an upper mid-range 28 W Alder Lake CPU designed for use in ultra-light laptops. It was announced in early 2022 and it features 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line i7-1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.1 GHz to 4.7 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.5 GHz to 3.4 GHz for the efficient cluster. The i7's shortcomings as compared to Intel Core i7-1270P include the marginally lower clock speeds and limited vPro feature set ("Essentials" tier only, not allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "littile" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Core i7-1260P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Intel Core i7-1260P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 5800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U and also the Core i5-11260H. This makes the 1260P a great little CPU - one capable of punching above its weight.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 35 W, the Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN is among the fastest laptops featuring the 1260P that we know of. It can be about 2 times as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system built around the same chip in our database (as of August 2023).

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.4 GHz has seemingly seen no change from what was built into certain Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7. Which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this graphics adapter. Its gaming performance is bound to be tied to how high the Power Limits and how good the cooling solution of a laptop are; expect something close to NVIDIA's MX350 or in other words, acceptable framerates in most games when playing at 1080p / Medium settings. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory. Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). Its "Minimum Assured" power consumption sits at 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

The i7-1260P is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. Despite that, many 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 parts are less power-hungry while being as fast (or even faster, depending on the workload) as the i7.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Intel Core i7-1260P
CodenameOryonAlder Lake-P
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P « 1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock <=3400 MHz1500 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB1.1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB10 MB
L3 Cache6 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 16
TDP35 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1260P
35.9 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
94 Points (53%)
435 Points (8%)
min: 6860     avg: 9551     median: 9711 (9%)     max: 12150 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1695     median: 1737.5 (73%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 541     avg: 653     median: 670 (73%)     max: 698 Points
min: 2634     avg: 3694     median: 3761.5 (9%)     max: 4748 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1625     median: 1626 (10%)     max: 2034 Points
min: 174.8     avg: 236.8     median: 243 (67%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 20.06     avg: 21.9     median: 22 (28%)     max: 23.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.93     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.15 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8490     avg: 8737     median: 8793 (53%)     max: 8927 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 33137     avg: 41867     median: 44516 (32%)     max: 47948 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 53950     avg: 63721     median: 63721 (41%)     max: 73492 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13568     avg: 14036     median: 14036 (17%)     max: 14504 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 235.874     avg: 262.5     median: 237.1 (3%)     max: 314.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.641     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.8 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6559     avg: 10179     median: 7200 (11%)     max: 16777 Points
min: 29214     avg: 39648     median: 41260.5 (24%)     max: 47064 MIPS
min: 4668     avg: 5335     median: 5373 (63%)     max: 5791 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 77.75     avg: 94.1     median: 94.1 (31%)     max: 110.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 224     avg: 245     median: 245 (57%)     max: 266 fps
min: 7.57     avg: 11     median: 11.5 (20%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.4     avg: 11.2     median: 11.6 (30%)     max: 11.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 635     median: 652 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
min: 494     avg: 638     median: 623 (8%)     max: 861 Seconds
min: 264     avg: 344.2     median: 328 (2%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 0.4559     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.569 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8954     avg: 12154     median: 12963.5 (28%)     max: 14103 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.718     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 7.842 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.183     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (1%)     max: 17.587 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 407.751     avg: 420.7     median: 424.8 (2%)     max: 429.697 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 44438     avg: 56424     median: 62250 (48%)     max: 66354 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10083     avg: 13706     median: 14374 (35%)     max: 14969 Points
min: 6250     avg: 14081     median: 14251 (35%)     max: 18968 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58070     avg: 71340     median: 72467.5 (59%)     max: 81448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61536     avg: 73824     median: 76374 (62%)     max: 81012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 67100     avg: 76553     median: 78260 (65%)     max: 82492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
min: 7812     avg: 12377     median: 12296 (31%)     max: 16042 Points
min: 12122     avg: 18172     median: 18321 (33%)     max: 22877 Points
min: 3678     avg: 6925     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 10150 Points
2424 Points (61%)
9532 Points (37%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
min: 2268     avg: 2271     median: 2271 (72%)     max: 2274 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
min: 9157     avg: 9648     median: 9648 (40%)     max: 10139 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576     avg: 1679     median: 1666.5 (65%)     max: 1805 Points
min: 1528     avg: 1704     median: 1719 (67%)     max: 1786 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6244     avg: 9624     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 14043 Points
min: 6499     avg: 8967     median: 9298 (17%)     max: 10570 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1557     avg: 1655     median: 1668 (7%)     max: 1694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6440     avg: 9445     median: 9907 (31%)     max: 10411 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6698     avg: 7261     median: 7531 (75%)     max: 7554 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 36974     avg: 38338     median: 38187 (38%)     max: 39852 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 450.7     avg: 459.1     median: 454.2 (1%)     max: 482.4 ms
min: 531     avg: 555     median: 543 (1%)     max: 604 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 92.2     avg: 102.6     median: 102.6 (1%)     max: 112.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 79579     avg: 80168     median: 80003 (60%)     max: 81088 Points
min: 70338     avg: 81728     median: 83695 (63%)     max: 86881 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 284.8     median: 285.5 (78%)     max: 297 Points
min: 224     avg: 244.7     median: 247 (68%)     max: 258 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 395     avg: 413.4     median: 419 (75%)     max: 423 Points
min: 250     avg: 280.9     median: 283 (51%)     max: 298 Points
min: 1482     avg: 1630     median: 1662 (62%)     max: 1811 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 44.4     median: 45.4 (8%)     max: 52.6 Watt
min: 30     avg: 50.2     median: 52.5 (9%)     max: 68.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 63     avg: 64.2     median: 64.2 (12%)     max: 65.3 Watt
min: 10.7     avg: 58.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 89.1 Watt
min: 4.52     avg: 7.4     median: 7 (5%)     max: 12.2 Watt
min: 4.38     avg: 6.8     median: 7 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
34.9 Points per Watt (26%)
min: 21.2     avg: 28.4     median: 26.4 (20%)     max: 50.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1260P → 107% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 13:52:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14064 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752407575s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.01s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14064 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got single benchmarks 14064 +0.032s ... 0.059s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.109s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)