Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7950X3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series with 16 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. With the release in February 2023, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is AMD's fastest consumer processor and the new top model of the 7000 series. The CPU cores clock from 4.2 GHz (base clock) up to 5.7 GHz (single core Turbo). In addition, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a CCD with 8 cores that can access the fast 3D V-cache, which offers considerably more gaming performance.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is consistently excellent in all applications tested. In addition, AMD was again able to increase the single-thread performance compared to the non-X3D models. Nevertheless, the lower base clock compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X means that a small drop in multi-thread performance has to be accepted.

The internal structure of the processor is comparable to the previous AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is also still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters with 8 cores each. However, the two CCDs differ significantly from each other because one offers the fast 3D V-Cache, which primarily improves gaming performance. In testing, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D was able to put the Intel Core i9-13900K in second place and is the fastest gaming CPU on the market at the time of testing. 

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is an extremely energy-efficient CPU with up to 162 watts (PPT) and is significantly more frugal under load than an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max. 230 watts).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DQualcomm Snapdragon 660Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Kryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D « 4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock4200 - 5700 MHz2200 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache16 MB
L3 Cache128 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 88 / 8
TDP120 Watt
Transistors13140 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm11 nm
Die Size263 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2Adreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISPAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
Architecturex86ARMARM
$699 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7950X3D
61.1 pt (85%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
36291 Points (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2053 Points (87%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
795 Points (88%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
14188 Points (35%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5974 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
326 Points (98%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
64.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.9 Points (96%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
16551 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
138015 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
72361 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8853 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
33.9 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15779 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
159341 MIPS (91%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
8321 MIPS (99%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
265.5 fps (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
392.5 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
42.4 fps (75%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.2 GB/s (72%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.9 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
133 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
86 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
20279 Points (43%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.1 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
305.1 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
99321 Points (87%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
36991 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86389 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86306 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
87725 Points (74%)
min: 15088     avg: 19093     median: 19488.5 (16%)     max: 21016 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
26168 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
44787 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
17206 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2238     avg: 2695     median: 2752 (31%)     max: 2815 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2311 Points (98%)
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
24343 Points (44%)
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2183 Points (9%)
15%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
23720 Points (75%)
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9240 Points (92%)
min: 1431     avg: 1598     median: 1617 (16%)     max: 1646 Points
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
87922 Points (96%)
min: 4895     avg: 5694     median: 5850 (6%)     max: 5913 Points
4938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
437 ms (1%)
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
94%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
313 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
383 Points (80%)
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
110%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)
87%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
95%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
190%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5789     avg: 6050     median: 6052 (40%)     max: 6426 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6274     avg: 6676     median: 6723 (34%)     max: 7026 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2193 Points (84%)
15%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
276 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
273 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118.4 Watt (78%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 25% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 24% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 12. 19:18:25

#0 checking url part for id 15000 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:38:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15000 +0.018s ... 0.049s

#8 got single benchmarks 15000 +0.009s ... 0.058s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.016s ... 0.074s

#10 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.037s ... 0.111s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.015s ... 0.126s

#12 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.036s ... 0.162s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.417s ... 0.579s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.579s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)