Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840U

The Ryzen 7 7840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Phoenix product family. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties; the 7840U also features Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's GNA and DL Boost.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces some rather solid AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems built around the 7840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840U in our extensive database is about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This means the Ryzen 7 APU packs quite a wallop, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 35 W, the Framework Laptop 13.5 is among the fastest systems powered by the 7840U that we know of. It can be about 30% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of December 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 7840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
CodenamePhoenix-U (Zen 4)Raphael (Zen4)Phoenix (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz4200 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB96 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt120 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm5 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2193 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C89 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
$449 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840U
37.9 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.4 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 81     avg: 89.7     median: 91 (51%)     max: 97 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 609     avg: 702     median: 730 (14%)     max: 768 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11739     avg: 12884     median: 12719 (12%)     max: 15074 Points
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
min: 10576     avg: 13277     median: 13767 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1373     avg: 1646     median: 1677.5 (71%)     max: 1742 Points
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (72%)     max: 1820 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1719     median: 1716 (72%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 533     avg: 644     median: 661.5 (72%)     max: 678 Points
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
min: 652     avg: 666     median: 669 (73%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4469     avg: 5039     median: 4967.5 (12%)     max: 5917 Points
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
min: 4210     avg: 5202     median: 5377 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1024.7     avg: 1946     median: 1990 (13%)     max: 2439 Points
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
min: 1590     avg: 2096     median: 2218 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 217     avg: 256.3     median: 264 (74%)     max: 272 Points
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
min: 247     avg: 263     median: 265 (74%)     max: 273 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 20.46     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (29%)     max: 24.8 Points
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (66%)     max: 2.97 Points
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5996     avg: 6669     median: 6669 (40%)     max: 7342 Points
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36812     avg: 38490     median: 38489.5 (28%)     max: 40167 Points
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 59874     avg: 63534     median: 63533.5 (41%)     max: 67193 Points
94035 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11172     avg: 12089     median: 12089 (15%)     max: 13006 Points
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
87.1 s (1%)
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
565 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5629     avg: 5723     median: 5723 (9%)     max: 5817 Points
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 50087     avg: 55687     median: 55145 (32%)     max: 62156 MIPS
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
min: 34490     avg: 54214     median: 58386 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4657     avg: 5816     median: 5952 (70%)     max: 6408 MIPS
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
min: 5633     avg: 5871     median: 5900 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 105.52     avg: 108.8     median: 108.8 (36%)     max: 112.1 fps
169.3 fps (57%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 232     avg: 237.3     median: 237.3 (55%)     max: 242.64 fps
344 fps (79%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.4     avg: 15.7     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 18.6 fps
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
min: 13.6     avg: 16.1     median: 16.5 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.953     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (27%)     max: 1.6 GB/s
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.1     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (22%)     max: 10.8 GB/s
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 332     avg: 418.5     median: 421 (5%)     max: 503 Seconds
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 440.6     median: 390 (5%)     max: 664 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 208     avg: 250.7     median: 259.5 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
min: 217     avg: 263.4     median: 237 (2%)     max: 380 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4559     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.581 sec
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12402     avg: 12635     median: 12482 (27%)     max: 13021 Points
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.238     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.397 s
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.168     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (1%)     max: 23.633 s
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 626.26     avg: 706     median: 705.7 (3%)     max: 785.226 s
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 60726     avg: 63048     median: 63563 (49%)     max: 64340 Points
97391 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12375     avg: 16776     median: 16474 (41%)     max: 19923 Points
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (43%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64410     avg: 71391     median: 72497 (59%)     max: 76886 Points
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64515     avg: 70689     median: 72428 (59%)     max: 75123 Points
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65423     avg: 72363     median: 74802 (62%)     max: 76863 Points
91846 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9655     avg: 15204     median: 16264 (41%)     max: 17714 Points
25510 Points (65%)
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17823     avg: 21641     median: 21584 (38%)     max: 25050 Points
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
min: 19497     avg: 22472     median: 23519 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6548     avg: 8155     median: 8138.5 (34%)     max: 9501 Points
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
min: 7179     avg: 8178     median: 8317 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1982     avg: 2367     median: 2394 (60%)     max: 2562 Points
2634 Points (66%)
min: 1896     avg: 2366     median: 2479 (62%)     max: 2508 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7310     avg: 9791     median: 10584 (41%)     max: 11489 Points
14288 Points (55%)
min: 7596     avg: 10709     median: 11130 (43%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1925     avg: 2150     median: 2149.5 (68%)     max: 2374 Points
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9176     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (40%)     max: 10416 Points
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1355     avg: 1705     median: 1738 (68%)     max: 1933 Points
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (75%)     max: 2027 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1824     median: 1853 (72%)     max: 1895 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7399     avg: 9113     median: 9382 (17%)     max: 10558 Points
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10246     median: 9968 (18%)     max: 10920 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1411     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (6%)     max: 1564 Points
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8055     avg: 8417     median: 8417 (27%)     max: 8779 Points
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6140 Points (61%)
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30359     avg: 32401     median: 32400.5 (32%)     max: 34442 Points
54840 Points (55%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 509     avg: 567     median: 550 (1%)     max: 746 ms
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
min: 523     avg: 550     median: 562 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 81820     avg: 82676     median: 82676 (62%)     max: 83532 Points
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (66%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 179.4     avg: 216.6     median: 208 (57%)     max: 256 Points
282 Points (77%)
min: 234     avg: 239.5     median: 239.5 (66%)     max: 245 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 188.4     avg: 262.1     median: 262 (47%)     max: 322 Points
353 Points (63%)
min: 259     avg: 283.4     median: 283 (51%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1256     avg: 1498     median: 1533.5 (57%)     max: 1804 Points
2216 Points (83%)
min: 1533     avg: 1606     median: 1595 (60%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.1     avg: 45.7     median: 47.2 (8%)     max: 54.7 Watt
218 Watt (38%)
min: 39.7     avg: 49.9     median: 53.1 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.2     avg: 42.6     median: 41.4 (8%)     max: 50.4 Watt
207 Watt (38%)
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.38     avg: 8.6     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 14.9 Watt
121.6 Watt (80%)
min: 5.18     avg: 7     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.99     avg: 7.7     median: 6.2 (7%)     max: 15.1 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.2 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.1     avg: 48     median: 47.1 (35%)     max: 55.1 Points per Watt
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 134% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 106% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 18:14:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15023 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751040882s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15023 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 15023 +0.015s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.006s ... 0.035s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#13 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.008s ... 0.046s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.125s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.125s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)