Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7730U

The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the second "Barcelo" refresh in early 2023 and offers the same specifications as the old Ryzen 7 5825U. The CPU integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in 7nm at TSMC.

The Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2 but stays behind the current Zen 4 based CPUs (e.g. 7040HS series).

Performance

The average 7730U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5825U, Ryzen 7 6800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U and also the Core i7-1360P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 30 W, the ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 is among the fastest laptops built around the 7730U that we know of. It can be almost 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (the 5825U was specified at 10 - 25W). 

Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125U

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125U is a lower mid-range Meteor Lake chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 12 cores (2 + 8 + 2) and 14 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 2, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.3 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 4-core Intel Arc Graphics, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 1.85 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.1 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125U comes with 12 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a decent number of PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 7.8 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125U features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125U is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125U will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be just a bit faster than the Core i7-1355U (Raptor Lake, 10 cores, 12 threads, up to 5.0 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 4-core Arc Graphics runs at up to 1.85 GHz. We expect the iGPU to be a little slower than the aging 96 EU Iris Xe meaning you will be able to play most games at 1080p with most settings set to Low.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc Graphics is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W, with 57 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. An active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 125U is comprised of several small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7730U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the second "Barcelo" refresh in early 2023 and offers the same specifications as the old Ryzen 7 5825U. The CPU integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in 7nm at TSMC. In comparison to the similar Ryzen 7 7730U, the PRO variant is aimed at business use and supports additional manageability and security features.

The Zen 3 microarchitecture offers significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2 but falls behind the current Zen 4-based CPUs (e.g., 7040HS series).

Performance

The average 7730U in our database performs similarly to the Ryzen 7 5825U, Ryzen 7 6800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, and also the Core i7-1360P concerning multi-thread benchmark scores.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs operating at up to 2000 MHz. The dual-channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy-efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, a 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB on the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watts (compared to the 5825U, which was specified between 10 and 25W).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7730UIntel Core Ultra 5 125UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
CodenameBarcelo-U RefreshMeteor Lake-PBarcelo-U Refresh
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Meteor Lake-UAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Barcelo-U Refresh
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135U3.6 - 4.4 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 115U0.7 - 4.2 GHz8 / 10 cores10 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz3600 - 4300 MHz2000 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 14
2 x 4.3 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.95 °C110 °C95 °C
SocketFP6BGA2049FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 1850 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7730U
34.5 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125U
33.5 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7730U
34.1 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 90.7     avg: 91.9     median: 91.6 (51%)     max: 93.3 Points
82.8 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 447     avg: 499.3     median: 493 (9%)     max: 564 Points
357 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7286     avg: 10291     median: 10801.5 (10%)     max: 11490 Points
min: 6650     avg: 9580     median: 9947.5 (9%)     max: 10483 Points
10095 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1335     avg: 1435     median: 1454.5 (61%)     max: 1466 Points
min: 1534     avg: 1563     median: 1559.5 (66%)     max: 1587 Points
1441 Points (61%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 533     avg: 560     median: 566.5 (62%)     max: 573 Points
min: 592     avg: 603     median: 604.5 (66%)     max: 609 Points
562 Points (61%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2849     avg: 3885     median: 4070.5 (10%)     max: 4267 Points
min: 2558     avg: 3707     median: 3830 (9%)     max: 4033 Points
3967 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1588     avg: 1800     median: 1830 (12%)     max: 1942 Points
min: 1117     avg: 1583     median: 1648.5 (10%)     max: 1680 Points
1756 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 221     avg: 229.2     median: 231 (64%)     max: 233 Points
min: 222     avg: 226.1     median: 226.5 (63%)     max: 230 Points
229 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.1 Points (25%)
17.6 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (66%)
2.7 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6243 Points (38%)
6108 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32670 Points (24%)
33735 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
57058 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11653 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
121.2 s (1%)
369.1 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.4 s (1%)
10.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5881 Points (9%)
5274 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 40263     avg: 48295     median: 49424.5 (28%)     max: 51898 MIPS
min: 28563     avg: 38216     median: 39090 (22%)     max: 41152 MIPS
min: 42735     avg: 45924     median: 45924 (26%)     max: 49113 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5222     avg: 5348     median: 5356 (63%)     max: 5426 MIPS
min: 4489     avg: 4573     median: 4572.5 (54%)     max: 4659 MIPS
min: 5218     avg: 5269     median: 5269 (62%)     max: 5320 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
90.9 fps (2%)
95 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.2 fps (6%)
221 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.91     avg: 12.4     median: 12.7 (22%)     max: 13.7 fps
min: 7.26     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12 fps
min: 11.5     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (21%)     max: 12.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.1 GB/s (26%)
4.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 479     avg: 523     median: 499.5 (6%)     max: 648 Seconds
min: 603     avg: 689     median: 656.5 (8%)     max: 904 Seconds
min: 523     avg: 528     median: 528 (7%)     max: 533 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 277     avg: 306.8     median: 296 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
min: 328     avg: 366.6     median: 350 (2%)     max: 485 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.543 sec
min: 0.526     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.558 sec
min: 0.543     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.553 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8758 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
18 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.1 s (2%)
456.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12032     avg: 13262     median: 13137.5 (32%)     max: 14468 Points
min: 13319     avg: 14086     median: 14304 (35%)     max: 14871 Points
min: 7418     avg: 10822     median: 10821.5 (27%)     max: 14225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70853 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
71033 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
71112 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14599     avg: 15565     median: 15564.5 (39%)     max: 16530 Points
min: 11380     avg: 12415     median: 12688 (32%)     max: 12972 Points
min: 12097     avg: 14052     median: 14052 (36%)     max: 16007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17814     avg: 20902     median: 21100.5 (38%)     max: 22553 Points
min: 16983     avg: 18926     median: 19295.5 (34%)     max: 20160 Points
min: 20193     avg: 20887     median: 20887 (37%)     max: 21581 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6221     avg: 6983     median: 6921.5 (29%)     max: 7756 Points
min: 5520     avg: 6601     median: 6607.5 (28%)     max: 7348 Points
min: 4961     avg: 5989     median: 5988.5 (25%)     max: 7016 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1836     avg: 1924     median: 1960 (47%)     max: 1976 Points
min: 2129     avg: 2151     median: 2149 (52%)     max: 2177 Points
min: 1889     avg: 1895     median: 1894.5 (46%)     max: 1900 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 6918     avg: 7230     median: 7013 (27%)     max: 7760 Points
min: 8384     avg: 9068     median: 9364 (36%)     max: 9601 Points
min: 5685     avg: 6336     median: 6336 (25%)     max: 6987 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1857     median: 1857 (59%)     max: 1887 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5510     avg: 6560     median: 6560 (27%)     max: 7610 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1480     median: 1479.5 (56%)     max: 1500 Points
min: 1531     avg: 1571     median: 1577.5 (60%)     max: 1607 Points
min: 1416     avg: 1438     median: 1437.5 (55%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6747     avg: 7546     median: 7573 (14%)     max: 8257 Points
min: 7417     avg: 8148     median: 8311 (15%)     max: 8581 Points
min: 5972     avg: 6560     median: 6559.5 (12%)     max: 7147 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1408     avg: 1429     median: 1429 (6%)     max: 1450 Points
1564 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7404     avg: 7765     median: 7765 (24%)     max: 8126 Points
7820 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6092 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
29078 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 616     avg: 630     median: 630 (1%)     max: 649 ms
min: 579     avg: 586     median: 586.5 (1%)     max: 594 ms
648 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 69506     avg: 71631     median: 71624 (52%)     max: 73179 Points
87239 Points (64%)
71022 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 191.5     avg: 207.4     median: 210.5 (58%)     max: 211 Points
min: 224     avg: 227.3     median: 227.5 (63%)     max: 231 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 251     avg: 262.5     median: 263 (47%)     max: 271 Points
min: 237     avg: 246.4     median: 247 (44%)     max: 253 Points
254 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1296     avg: 1319     median: 1321 (49%)     max: 1350 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1430     median: 1400.5 (52%)     max: 1648 Points
1207 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 46.2     median: 46 (8%)     max: 58.3 Watt
min: 26.8     avg: 43.4     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 55.8 Watt
44.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 50.9     median: 46.3 (8%)     max: 67 Watt
min: 30.3     avg: 52.3     median: 58 (11%)     max: 60.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.23     avg: 6.4     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 11.5 Watt
min: 3.31     avg: 5.9     median: 5.1 (3%)     max: 10.1 Watt
7.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.99     avg: 7.6     median: 7.5 (9%)     max: 11.6 Watt
min: 4.49     avg: 5     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 5.96 Watt
9.1 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.9     avg: 33.7     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 38.6 Points per Watt
min: 26.5     avg: 30.2     median: 29 (22%)     max: 36.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7730U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125U → 99% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U → 95% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 04. 04:01:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14956 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16919 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16350 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759543265s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14956 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14956 +0.011s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16919 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 16919 +0.014s ... 0.041s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16350 +0.004s ... 0.045s

#13 got single benchmarks 16350 +0.005s ... 0.05s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.117s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)