AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (Microsoft Surface Edition) is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics card with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

As the Ryzen 5 3580U CPU specification is identical to the Ryzen 5 3500U, the processor performance should be similar. AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U and 3580U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Including the 35 Watt TDP, the 3750H should be a capable upper mid-range processor for laptops, including gaming laptops.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3700 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 8
15 35
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
37.5 pt (38%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
39.2 pt (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
352 Points (55%)
min: 340     avg: 359     median: 352 (55%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1549 Points (15%)
min: 1633     avg: 1750     median: 1793 (17%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
693 Points (15%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
min: 672     avg: 753     median: 757 (17%)     max: 805 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
139 Points (51%)
min: 135     avg: 144     median: 143.5 (53%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (16%)
9.2 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (53%)
1.6 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4525 (40%)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (43%)     max: 4898
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18307 (31%)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (35%)     max: 20750
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
275 s (3%)
197 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.2 s (1%)
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 (19%)
2866 (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15209 MIPS (12%)
min: 18689     avg: 18938     median: 18938 (15%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3572 MIPS (24%)
min: 3511     avg: 3585     median: 3585 (24%)     max: 3659 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40.1 fps (18%)
48.6 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
135 fps (40%)
139 fps (41%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.1 fps (13%)
min: 4.352     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (14%)     max: 4.4 fps
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (16%)
0.5 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (16%)
0.7 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.5 GB/s (13%)
5 GB/s (19%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
710 Seconds (5%)
min: 584.19     avg: 609     median: 608.6 (4%)     max: 633 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5545 Points (31%)
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (41%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.2 s (1%)
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
694 s (3%)
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21501 Points (25%)
25143 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6856 Points (28%)
min: 6606     avg: 7734     median: 7941 (33%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
47473 Points (31%)
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (31%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
48287 Points (51%)
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (55%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
52082 Points (54%)
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (57%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6687 Points (17%)
min: 5698     avg: 7502     median: 7786.5 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9805 Points (25%)
min: 10737     avg: 11312     median: 11370.5 (29%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2898 Points (20%)
min: 3276     avg: 3409     median: 3373 (24%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (77%)     max: 3819
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 (60%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 (29%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (57%)     max: 4186
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (21%)     max: 13738
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (53%)     max: 959
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (22%)     max: 3718
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
900 (50%)
874 (48%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2990 (18%)
3537 (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1243 ms (2%)
min: 1157.6     avg: 1182     median: 1161.5 (2%)     max: 1227.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (45%)
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (49%)     max: 30714 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.1 Watt (11%)
min: 95     avg: 139     median: 138.5 (37%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40 Watt (11%)
min: 66.4     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (22%)     max: 97.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 110% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)