Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Processor N200

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3200UIntel Core i3-N305Intel Processor N200
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen)Alder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Clock2600 - 3500 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 48 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
22.5 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
65 Points (37%)
69%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
324 Points (6%)
28%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (32%)     max: 780 Points
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (41%)     max: 380 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (36%)     max: 130 Points
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
113 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
24%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
67%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4258 Points (26%)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9284 Points (7%)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
28%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
69%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
483.5 s (6%)
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14 s (3%)
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1613 Points (3%)
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
131%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
3230 MIPS (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19.5 fps (7%)
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (19%)     max: 56.2 fps
16.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
97.8 fps (23%)
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
126%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
161%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
145%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
29%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3755 Points (8%)
9081 Points (19%)
104%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.5 s (3%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29 s (1%)
36.5 s (2%)
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
730 s (3%)
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
33%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (9%)     max: 3835 Points
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (22%)     max: 9111 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
55544 Points (45%)
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
56367 Points (46%)
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (39%)     max: 52242 Points
61854 Points (50%)
34749 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (33%)     max: 1326 Points
73%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
35%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1261 Points (40%)
68%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
4584 Points (19%)
30%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (31%)     max: 847 Points
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (41%)     max: 1083 Points
117%
N200 +
928 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
108%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
128%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (7%)     max: 7733 Points
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
140%
N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
1460 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
23991 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (46%)     max: 194 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (25%)     max: 154 Points
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (33%)     max: 190.4 Points
123%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
43 MB/s (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
374.6 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (42%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (34%)     max: 1027 Points
67%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.2 Watt (3%)
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
122%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.4 Watt (4%)
36.9 Watt (7%)
143%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
62%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
123%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)
88%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 186% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 91% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 12. 20:40:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755024013s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.012s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.002s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#13 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.007s ... 0.039s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.106s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.106s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)