Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i3-N305Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 3800 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
28.8 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
65 Points (45%)
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
324 Points (6%)
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (42%)     max: 380 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (50%)     max: 167 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.05 Points
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (28%)     max: 40726 Points
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
104%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
102%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 21080     avg: 21623     median: 21239 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (49%)     max: 4123 MIPS
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (20%)     max: 56.2 fps
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1152     avg: 1199     median: 1198.5 (15%)     max: 1245 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9081 Points (19%)
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
36.5 s (2%)
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (25%)     max: 28937 Points
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (24%)     max: 9111 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
55544 Points (45%)
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
56367 Points (46%)
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
61854 Points (52%)
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1304     avg: 1316     median: 1318 (40%)     max: 1326 Points
956 Points (29%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 4632     avg: 4798     median: 4727 (19%)     max: 5034 Points
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1050     avg: 1068     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1083 Points
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4492     avg: 4680     median: 4644 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (19%)     max: 17690 Points
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 981     avg: 986     median: 984 (1%)     max: 993 ms
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 158.2     median: 145.3 (42%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (39%)     max: 190.4 Points
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 881     avg: 907     median: 881 (34%)     max: 958 Points
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 22.9     avg: 27.6     median: 25.5 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
102%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
36.9 Watt (7%)
105%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 7.2 Watt
98%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 5.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)
72%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 58% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 03:55:09

#0 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.019s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.021s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.017s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.012s ... 0.092s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.367s ... 0.459s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.483s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)