, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities  to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications. 

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F.

At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M. Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro 5000MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiFermiN17P-Q1
ArchitectureFermiFermiMaxwell
Pipelines240 - unified320 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz405 MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz810 MHz
Memory Speed625 MHz1200 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynonono
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology40 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 27.07.2010 13.01.2017
Transistors3000 Million1870 Million
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product-qua...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
10.1 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (18%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (10%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (8%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (4%)
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (13%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (3%)
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (9%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 7700     avg: 7767     median: 7766.5 (8%)     max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (6%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7015 Points (6%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (28%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (26%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
12967 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (49%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
13127 Points (24%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (15%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.13     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (20%)     max: 29 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (38%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.96     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (44%)     max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (74%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (36%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 29.99     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (36%)     max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (32%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 6.4     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (27%)     max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (92%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 43.9     avg: 44.6     median: 44.6 (34%)     max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 31.9     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (36%)     max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.6     avg: 29     median: 29 (14%)     max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (30%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.1     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (33%)     max: 28.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.4 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 69.01     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (30%)     max: 78.37 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 34.18     avg: 34.9     median: 34.7 (12%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (11%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (11%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (14%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (10%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (26%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (16%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (14%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (19%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
32.7 fps (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.79     avg: 108     median: 108.2 (30%)     max: 113.54 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (8%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (4%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → 107% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 207% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.16
log 17. 13:31:34

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:22:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.036s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.005s ... 0.092s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0s ... 0.093s

#11 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.005s ... 0.098s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.004s ... 0.102s

#13 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.008s ... 0.11s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.131s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.131s

#17 Got 47 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.138s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.138s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.14s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.014s ... 0.154s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.154s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.154s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)