Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T830 MP3 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP3

ARM Mali-T830 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP3

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the Samsung Exynos 7880 in the beginning of 2017. The chip features three clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-T860 MP2 and therefore all typical Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 in the Exynos 7880 is manufactured in 14 nm and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP3

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and uses 3 clusters (hence the MC3/MP3 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP3 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U / Realme 7 5G) is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-T830 MP3ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Mali-G Series
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Pipelines2 - unified3 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2
technology16 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
CPU in Mali-T830 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78808 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 800U8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
13314 Points (2%)
min: 29682     avg: 32144     median: 32143.5 (4%)     max: 34605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
1180 Points (5%)
min: 3377     avg: 4000     median: 4032.5 (18%)     max: 4467 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
1074 Points (2%)
min: 3497     avg: 4324     median: 4247.5 (9%)     max: 5012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
746 Points (4%)
min: 2551     avg: 2908     median: 2783.5 (14%)     max: 3291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
643 Points (2%)
min: 2375     avg: 2831     median: 2656 (8%)     max: 3304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1207     avg: 1337     median: 1226 (1%)     max: 1586 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 331     avg: 393.6     median: 366 (0%)     max: 461 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 8.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.9     median: 18 (1%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
5.2 fps (1%)
min: 13     avg: 16.6     median: 17 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
9.1 fps (0%)
min: 25     avg: 29.4     median: 27.5 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
15 fps (1%)
min: 37     avg: 43.3     median: 42.5 (2%)     max: 51 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
34 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP3
min: 57     avg: 72     median: 70 (1%)     max: 83 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 84032     avg: 91910     median: 90626 (11%)     max: 101071 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 28.5     avg: 35.2     median: 33.7 (0%)     max: 44.63 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9293     avg: 21578     median: 25659 (26%)     max: 29783 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3448     avg: 16034     median: 22192 (39%)     max: 22461 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.42     avg: 3.5     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 4.98 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 320% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP3:
39 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP3:
40  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
203%
Mali-G57 MP3:
61  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
29  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 203%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 203%

ARM Mali-G57 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift6045
Armajet50
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 261
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


3
2

2







ARM Mali-T830 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 23:33:42

#0 checking url part for id 7686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10571 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:37:06 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.08s ... 0.081s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.081s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.081s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7686 +0.025s ... 0.106s

#8 got single benchmarks 7686 +0.008s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10571 +0.002s ... 0.115s

#10 got single benchmarks 10571 +0.033s ... 0.148s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.148s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.238s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.238s

#14 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.247s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.247s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.251s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.268s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.268s

#19 return log +0.047s ... 0.315s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)