Notebookcheck Logo

IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

IMG BXM-4-64 MC1

► remove from comparison Imagination IMG BXM-4-64 MC1

The Imagination Technologies IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 is an integrated mid-range graphics unit for ARM SoCs, which was introduced at the end of 2020 and found in the Allwinner A733 (12nm) smartphone and tablet chip, for example.

The IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 is optimized for efficient performance and is based on the PowerVR B-Series architecture. According to the manufacturer, it achieves up to 30 percent lower power consumption than previous IMG GPUs.

According to Imagination, the BXM-4-64 MC1 (single core) delivers 4 texels/clock and 64 FP32/clock. The wavefront width is 32 bits.

The graphics APIs OpenGL ES 3.X, Vulkan 1.3, OpenCL 3.0 and Android NN HAL are supported.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 685

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 685

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).

IMG BXM-4-64 MC1Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 600 Series
IMG BXM-8-256 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameB-Series
ArchitectureB-SeriesAdreno 600
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.x, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12
technology12 nm8 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement09.09.2014 15.12.2015 06.12.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imaginationtech.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in IMG BXM-4-64 MC1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Allwinner A7339 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 685GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Microsoft SQ18 x 3000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
800 Points (3%)
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
662 Points (2%)
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
468 Points (0%)
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 122     avg: 123     median: 123 (0%)     max: 124 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.81     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (0%)     max: 2.1 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (0%)     max: 5.8 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (0%)     max: 4.9 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 9.8     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (0%)     max: 11 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
15 fps (1%)
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
31.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 25.5     median: 25.5 (0%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 24250     avg: 24354     median: 24354 (2%)     max: 24458 Points
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
9.4 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
202 Points (0%)
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
18530 Points (6%)
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
5722 Points (9%)
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
4.4 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 332% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 434% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1:
17.2 19.7 ~ 18 fps
206%
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
100%
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1:
10.2  fps
353%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1:
12.1  fps
223%
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1:
25.8 29.9 ~ 28 fps
139%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1:
26.2 29.8 ~ 28 fps
111%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 206%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 202%

IMG BXM-4-64 MC1Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 685
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact1810.212.1373627
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile2828394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 685
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


1


1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

5


2


2
4
1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 24. 12:02:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756029773s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:19:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.021s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12993 +0.023s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 12993 +0.004s ... 0.049s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.049s

#12 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.037s ... 0.087s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0s ... 0.087s

#14 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.003s ... 0.09s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.112s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.112s

#18 Got 127 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.129s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.129s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.129s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.133s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.133s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.133s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)