Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-9000 vs Intel Core i5-7300U

AMD E2-9000

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9000

The AMD E2-9000 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in 2017. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the older E2-9010, the E2-9000 offers a lower base speed (1.8 versus 2 GHz).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9000 with 10 Watts (compared to the 9010 at 15W). This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Core i5-7300U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7300U

The Intel Core i5-7300U is a fast dual-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It integrates 2 CPU cores with Hyper-Threading support clocked at 2.6 - 3.5 GHz (2 core Turbo also 3.5 GHz). Besides two cores, the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 620 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

With 2.5 to 3.5 GHz, the Core i5-7300U clocks significantly higher than the old Core i5-7200U (2.5 - 3.1) and Core i5-6200U (2.3 - 2.8 GHz). Thanks to the fast Turbo frequency, the performance should be slightly below to the Core i7-7500U (2.7 - 3.5 GHz, but 4 MB L3 cache). Therfore, the performance is sufficient for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 620 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 520) running at 300 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 7.5 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelAMD E2-9000Intel Core i5-7300U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U « 2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP10 Watt15 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA1356
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache3 MB
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
84 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
47 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1 Points (1%)
min: 3.57     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (5%)     max: 4.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (15%)
min: 1.59     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (40%)     max: 1.64 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1787 Points (11%)
min: 5524     avg: 5529     median: 5529 (33%)     max: 5534 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2897 Points (2%)
min: 12072     avg: 12298     median: 12298 (9%)     max: 12524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
14213 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7185 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1242 s (15%)
min: 446.9     avg: 467.8     median: 467.8 (6%)     max: 488.6 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
36.2 s (7%)
min: 13.8     avg: 14.6     median: 14.6 (3%)     max: 15.38 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
744 Points (1%)
2696 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.3 fps (2%)
min: 24     avg: 24     median: 24 (8%)     max: 24.08 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
35.7 fps (8%)
min: 128     avg: 128.2     median: 128.2 (30%)     max: 128.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (2%)
2.1 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1556 Points (3%)
min: 4126     avg: 4492     median: 4491.5 (10%)     max: 4857 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26.9 s (6%)
min: 11.03     avg: 12     median: 12 (3%)     max: 13 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.8 s (3%)
min: 25     avg: 25     median: 25 (1%)     max: 25.03 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1304 s (6%)
min: 560     avg: 564     median: 564 (3%)     max: 568 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3146 Points (3%)
10915 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1199 Points (3%)
min: 3873     avg: 4393     median: 4364.5 (12%)     max: 4823 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11949 Points (10%)
min: 40272     avg: 43335     median: 44182 (36%)     max: 45552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
10209 Points (8%)
min: 36277     avg: 40889     median: 40888.5 (33%)     max: 45500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
11528 Points (10%)
min: 47197     avg: 47678     median: 47678 (40%)     max: 48159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
914 Points (2%)
min: 2870     avg: 3520     median: 3396 (9%)     max: 4053 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1255 Points (2%)
min: 4062     avg: 5086     median: 4947 (9%)     max: 5757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1657 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1591 Points (16%)
4219 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2461 Points (3%)
8266 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1543 Points (21%)
4096 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2371 Points (6%)
7915 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2323 Points (4%)
7603 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1430 Points (28%)
3487 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2439 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1526 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2993 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2893 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2847 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2914 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2894 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3175 ms (4%)
min: 1044     avg: 1119     median: 1075.5 (1%)     max: 1279 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
258.9 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10575 Points (10%)
min: 32474     avg: 34055     median: 33734 (30%)     max: 36276 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9000 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7300U → 293% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 21:26:43

#0 checking url part for id 9294 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8411 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9294 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 9294 +0.01s ... 0.046s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8411 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 8411 +0.028s ... 0.078s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.281s ... 0.359s

#12 return log +0.055s ... 0.413s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)