Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V vs AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is one of the 2 slowest Lunar Lake family processors as of Nov 2024. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.5 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 40 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 5 228V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is a staggering 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 226V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Elsewhere, the 226V has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 40 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Our in-house testing of an Acer laptop powered by the Ultra 5 chip revealed the latter to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U in multi-threaded tasks which is OK but not mind-blowing for late 2024. It is worth noting that the laptop in question does not use the Intel-recommended 17 W long-term power target; instead, the processor gets 30 W to eat which affects its benchmark scores significantly.

Generally speaking, the 226V, 228V, 236V and 238V are slower than the 256V, 258V, 266V, 268V, 288V due to the difference in their last-level cache size as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. Exact figures depend on the TDP values of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 130V has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 1,850 MHz, as well as 7 ray tracing units at its disposal. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

While this 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads, the only laptop powered by this chip that we have tested as of early Nov 2024 has a much higher value than that at 30 W.

The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

AMD Ryzen 7 250

► remove from comparison AMD R7 250

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the now years-old Hawk Point family that was announced at CES 2025. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 250 is a rebadged R7 8840U. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 7 250 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Since the R7 250 is an 8840U / 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V in multi-thread workloads. Therefore, the CPU performance is good enough even for demanding tasks, as of 2025.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The R7 250 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 250

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the now years-old Hawk Point family that was announced at CES 2025. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 250 is a rebadged R7 8840U. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 250, the PRO model offers additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments, such as Secure Processor (an ARM security co-processor).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the PRO 250 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 PRO 250 is an 8840U / 7840U (PRO) in disguise, we expect its multi-thread performance to be close to that of the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V which, as of 2025, is good enough even for demanding tasks.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W or as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The R7 PRO 250 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 226VAMD Ryzen 7 250AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
CodenameLunar LakeHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Lunar LakeAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V « 2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 250 « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4500 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache14 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP17 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2833FP8FP8
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (40 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 130V ( - 1850 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 5 226V
36.4 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 250
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 111     avg: 111.8     median: 111.7 (63%)     max: 113 Points
93%
1 R7 250 +
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 530     avg: 580     median: 590.5 (11%)     max: 609 Points
143%
1 R7 250 +
846 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9827     avg: 9869     median: 9854 (9%)     max: 9940 Points
164%
1 R7 250 +
16154 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1699     avg: 1722     median: 1720 (72%)     max: 1749 Points
96%
1 R7 250 +
1649 Points (69%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 653     avg: 663     median: 661.5 (72%)     max: 674 Points
105%
1 R7 250 +
694 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3835     avg: 3855     median: 3849 (9%)     max: 3885 Points
164%
1 R7 250 +
6320 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1483     avg: 1502     median: 1505.5 (10%)     max: 1514 Points
169%
1 R7 250 +
2544 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 265     median: 264.5 (74%)     max: 270 Points
105%
1 R7 250 +
279 Points (78%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.1 Points (25%)
156%
1 R7 250 +
29.8 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (75%)
105%
1 R7 250 +
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9738 Points (59%)
77%
1 R7 250 +
7457 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42086 Points (30%)
102%
1 R7 250 +
42932 Points (31%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4824 Points (8%)
137%
1 R7 250 +
6595 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 33099     avg: 33170     median: 33110 (19%)     max: 33302 MIPS
192%
1 R7 250 +
63475 MIPS (36%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5272     avg: 5304     median: 5305 (63%)     max: 5335 MIPS
122%
1 R7 250 +
6485 MIPS (76%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
93.6 fps (31%)
153%
1 R7 250 +
143.1 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305.4 fps (70%)
88%
1 R7 250 +
268.8 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.2     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (22%)     max: 12.8 fps
144%
1 R7 250 +
18.1 fps (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
188%
1 R7 250 +
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.1 GB/s (19%)
182%
1 R7 250 +
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.1 GB/s (18%)
156%
1 R7 250 +
11.1 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 550     avg: 578     median: 568 (7%)     max: 624 Seconds
173%
1 R7 250 +
328 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 346     avg: 350.5     median: 350.5 (2%)     max: 355 Seconds
172%
1 R7 250 +
204 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4808     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4873 sec
108%
1 R7 250 +
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10506 Points (22%)
143%
1 R7 250 +
15033 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
126%
1 R7 250 +
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
112%
1 R7 250 +
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
458.3 s (2%)
70%
1 R7 250 +
652 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
48122 Points (37%)
155%
1 R7 250 +
74623 Points (57%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14236     avg: 14349     median: 14353.5 (35%)     max: 14451 Points
127%
1 R7 250 +
18295 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76606 Points (62%)
111%
1 R7 250 +
85107 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13013     avg: 13184     median: 13183.5 (33%)     max: 13354 Points
123%
1 R7 250 +
16219 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19392     avg: 19765     median: 19828 (35%)     max: 20013 Points
119%
1 R7 250 +
23655 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6647     avg: 7221     median: 7298.5 (31%)     max: 7639 Points
127%
1 R7 250 +
9257 Points (39%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2527     avg: 2564     median: 2573 (64%)     max: 2584 Points
101%
1 R7 250 +
2586 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9850     avg: 10006     median: 10010.5 (39%)     max: 10151 Points
99%
1 R7 250 +
9956 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1852     avg: 1874     median: 1877.5 (73%)     max: 1888 Points
102%
1 R7 250 +
1911 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8704     avg: 8890     median: 8931 (16%)     max: 8995 Points
109%
1 R7 250 +
9720 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7753 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
31261 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
7772 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
40469 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 507     avg: 523     median: 510 (1%)     max: 543 ms
96%
1 R7 250 +
534 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 97354     avg: 97895     median: 97895 (74%)     max: 98436 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249     avg: 258.3     median: 261 (72%)     max: 266 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 272     avg: 280.7     median: 284 (51%)     max: 286 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1555     avg: 1566     median: 1560 (58%)     max: 1582 Points
112%
1 R7 250 +
1746 Points (65%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 29.4     avg: 46     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
65%
1 R7 250 +
76 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.5     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (10%)     max: 53.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (3%)     max: 5.43 Watt
24%
1 R7 250 +
18.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.27     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.69 Watt
26%
1 R7 250 +
21.3 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.8     avg: 28.9     median: 28.8 (21%)     max: 30 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 226V → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 250 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 06:32:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18000 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19148 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19152 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751085159s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18000 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 18000 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19148 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 19148 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19152 +0s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 19152 +0s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.069s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)