Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4505 vs Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-10110U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10110U

The Intel Core i3-10110U is a dual-core SoC of the Comet Lake family. The i3 is designed for use in ultraportable laptops of the more affordable flavor as well as mini-PCs. It was announced in August 2019. Just like the other Comet Lake processors, this Core i3 features several advantages over the outgoing Whiskey Lake family including support for faster memory (up to LPDDR4-2933).

Core i3-10110U runs at 2.1 GHz to 4.1 GHz (only 3.7 GHz are reachable when under multi-thread load). Hyper-Threading support is enabled for 4 processing threads in total.

Performance

The average 10110U in our database shapes up to be a decent entry-level CPU, as of late 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and also the Core i3-8145U. While not a whole lot faster than Intel's more affordable Pentium Gold and Pentium Silver chips, the i3 will still let you run most apps with virtually no annoying slowdowns.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 runs at up to 1,000 MHz. What makes this specific iGPU peculiar is that it only has 23 Execution Units at its disposal, not the 24 EUs typical for a UHD Graphics 620. Otherwise, it's the usual affair with 4K monitor support (up to three displays at the same time) and a hardware video decoder that's friends with VP9, AVC, HEVC but not the newer AV1 video codec.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the SoC.

The i3-10110U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processees for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4505Intel Core i3-10110U
CodenameJasper LakeComet Lake-U
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U compare1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U « 2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2100 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP10 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.3 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10110U
26 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
min: 1910     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (25%)     max: 615 Points
min: 1031     avg: 1033     median: 1032.5 (43%)     max: 1034 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (25%)     max: 236 Points
min: 400     avg: 402     median: 401 (44%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
min: 743     avg: 808     median: 753 (2%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
min: 314     avg: 351.8     median: 321 (2%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (30%)     max: 108 Points
min: 129     avg: 159     median: 162 (45%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.28 Points
1.9 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
min: 6311     avg: 6349     median: 6349 (38%)     max: 6387 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
min: 11023     avg: 11205     median: 11204.5 (8%)     max: 11386 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10063 Points (6%)
14261 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5294 Points (6%)
8184 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
min: 523     avg: 533     median: 533 (6%)     max: 543 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
min: 13.92     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
min: 1695     avg: 2156     median: 2156 (3%)     max: 2617 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
min: 9858     avg: 10292     median: 10291.5 (6%)     max: 10725 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
min: 4038     avg: 4154     median: 4153.5 (49%)     max: 4269 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
min: 20.55     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (7%)     max: 20.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
72.3 fps (17%)
min: 106.5     avg: 110.1     median: 110.1 (25%)     max: 113.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
min: 2.72     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (5%)     max: 3.12 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
min: 0.21     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
min: 0.346     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (6%)     max: 0.394 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.3 GB/s (3%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
min: 1174     avg: 1280     median: 1279.5 (9%)     max: 1385 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.76 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
min: 9.404     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 9.446 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
min: 21.75     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 22.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
min: 529     avg: 539     median: 538.5 (2%)     max: 548 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
min: 3863     avg: 4262     median: 4157 (10%)     max: 4765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
24182 Points (20%)
min: 35890     avg: 39828     median: 40101 (33%)     max: 43494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
min: 34543     avg: 38846     median: 39392 (32%)     max: 42604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (21%)     max: 26045 Points
min: 42440     avg: 47299     median: 47408 (39%)     max: 52050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
min: 3489     avg: 3565     median: 3579 (9%)     max: 3627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
min: 5122     avg: 5365     median: 5285 (9%)     max: 5687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
894 Points (4%)
min: 1745     avg: 3394     median: 3394 (14%)     max: 5043 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
508 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
852 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (26%)     max: 660 Points
min: 957     avg: 987     median: 987 (39%)     max: 1017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
min: 2017     avg: 2026     median: 2025.5 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
1002 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
2034 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
4455 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (5%)     max: 5086 Points
8289 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4397 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7865 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
7335 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7635 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3765 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6421 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6567 Points (60%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8305 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8126 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7706 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
min: 1220     avg: 1244     median: 1244 (1%)     max: 1268 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
353.4 ms (4%)
95.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24502 Points (19%)
29833 Points (23%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (22%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (20%)     max: 115 Points
min: 145     avg: 164     median: 164 (29%)     max: 183 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
46.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
24.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
12.9 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110U → 181% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 02:39:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11463 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751071176s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11463 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 11463 +0.009s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.074s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)